Early removal of Fallopian tubes and delayed removal of ovaries in women at high risk of ovarian cancer
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN25173360 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25173360 |
| Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) | 237992 |
| Protocol serial number | IRAS project ID: 237992 |
| Sponsor | Queen Mary University of London |
| Funder | Barts and the London Charity |
- Submission date
- 04/06/2018
- Registration date
- 14/06/2018
- Last edited
- 14/10/2025
- Recruitment status
- Suspended
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Cancer
Plain English summary of protocol
https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/find-a-clinical-trial/a-study-to-prevent-ovarian-cancer-by-removing-the-fallopian-tubes-and-then-the-ovaries-protector (added 10/03/2021)
Background and study aims
Some women have an inheritable fault in their genetic code which increases their risk of developing ovarian cancer. Genes in which a fault may lie are BRCA1/ BRCA2/ RAD51C/ RAD51D/ BRIP1. Some women with a strong family history of ovarian cancer or breast and ovarian cancer may also be at increased risk. There is currently no screening programme for ovarian cancer available on the NHS. Therefore current practice is to offer women at increased risk, once they have completed their family, an operation to remove their fallopian tubes and ovaries. This procedure is called risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. This is the best known way to prevent ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. However, in women who are premenopausal it leads to early menopause. Early menopause has serious health implications. It results in menopausal type symptoms (e.g. hot flushes, changes in mood, reduced sex drive), increased risk of osteoporosis (brittle bones), heart disease, stroke, dementia and sexual problems. Research suggests many ovarian cancers start in the fallopian tube. This has led to the proposal of an alternative strategy to prevent ovarian cancer. This involves having the operation in two stages. The first operation involves removing the fallopian tubes alone. This is called 'early salpingectomy’. The second operation removes the ovaries after natural menopause (average age 51 in the UK). This is called 'delayed oophorectomy’. The advantage of this two-stage alternative is that it offers some protection against ovarian cancer in young women whilst avoiding negative health consequences of early menopause.
The PROTECTOR study aims to find out how many ovarian cancers happen after removing the tubes. This will help us assess how effective having just the tubes removed is for reducing the risk of ovarian cancer (i.e. what the precise level of ovarian cancer risk reduction is). This would help policy makers to decide whether this two-step procedure (RRESDO) should be recommended in routine clinical practice. The study will also carry out an economic evaluation to see whether this is affordable for the NHS.
The PROTECTOR study will also assess people’s views and the impact of this two-step procedure on sexual function, hormone levels, quality of life and overall satisfaction. We will compare RRESDO to the traditional approach of removing both the tubes and ovaries in the same operation (RRSO). We will also compare this to the well-being of individuals who choose not to have an operation.
Who can participate?
Women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer, who are aged 30 years and over and have not gone through the menopause.
What does the study involve?
Participants will be given the choice of which arm of the study they wish to be part of:
1. RRESDO (risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy): the new, two-stage operation (initial removal of tubes alone, followed by later removal of ovaries at a second operation after natural menopause or sooner if requested).
2. RRSO (risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy): removal of both tubes and ovaries at the same time. This is the current standard operation offered on the NHS to prevent ovarian cancer.
3. Controls: no operation involved.
Everyone will be required to complete questionnaires at the start of the study and annually. These ask about medical history, family history, quality of life, sexual function, cancer worry, psychological well-being and how satisfied individuals are with their decision.
All participants will also have a blood test at the start of the study and during follow up for a hormone called FSH. This will provide information on how the ovaries are functioning. Women who decide to have an operation to prevent ovarian cancer (either RRSO or RRESDO) will have a baseline ultrasound scan to look at the ovaries and a blood test for an ovarian cancer marker called CA125.
A small number of women from each study arm will be approached to take part in an optional interview. Interviews will explore views on acceptability, interest, factors influencing decision-making and willingness to undergo the new two-stage operation. Those who go on to have an operation (RRESDO/RRSO), will be contacted 1 year after their operation for a follow-up interview to discuss their satisfaction with the process and their general health and wellbeing.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits include:
1. The opportunity of having a two staged operation (RRESDO) to prevent ovarian cancer. This is not currently routinely available outside the study. It involves removal of the tubes in the first step followed by removal of ovaries at a later date.
2. Removal of the tubes alone will provide some protection against developing ovarian cancer and also preserve ovarian function which will delay or avoid early menopause. This can prevent the adverse health consequences of early menopause.
3. Participants will be given the choice of deciding which arm of the study they wish to be a part of: RRESDO (new procedure), RRSO (current standard practice), or controls (no surgery).
4. Participants will be contributing to research into preventing ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. Results of this study will help us better understand the impact of the new two stage procedure. This will help develop future clinical care guidelines and plan future care pathways for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Risks:
1. Although there is evidence to suggest removal of tubes alone provides some protection against developing ovarian cancer, the precise extent of this protection is unclear. There is the possibility of getting ovarian cancer despite removal of tubes.
2. It is unclear if a possible benefit of reduced breast cancer risk is lost by not removing ovaries before menopause.
3. The two-stage option (RRESDO) involves two operations instead of one (RRSO: removal of both tubes and ovaries). Each operation has potential complications. As there are two operations this may lead to more complications overall.
4. There is concern that not everyone having their tubes removed initially will go on to have their ovaries removed at a later date. This would mean that these women who don’t do so could still remain at an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Where is the study run from?
Queen Mary University of London (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2018 to July 2030
Who is funding the study?
Barts and the London Charity
Rosetrees Trust
Who is the main contact?
1. Prof Ranjit Manchanda
r.manchanda@qmul.ac.uk
2. PROTECTOR central coordinating team
bci-protector@qmul.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis (CCSPED)
Wolfson Institute of Population Health
Queen Mary University of London
Charterhouse Square
London
EC1M 6BQ
United Kingdom
| 0000-0003-3381-5057 | |
| Phone | +44 (0)7979 884575 |
| r.manchanda@qmul.ac.uk |
Public
Barts Cancer Institute, ECMC, Queen Mary University of London
Old Anatomy Building, Charterhouse Square
London
EC1M 6BQ
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)786 060 6579 |
|---|---|
| bci-protector@qmul.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Multicentre prospective three-armed cohort study |
| Secondary study design | Non randomised study |
| Participant information sheet | ISRCTN25173360_PIS_v4_16Apr2018.pdf |
| Scientific title | Preventing Ovarian Cancer through early Excision of Tubes and late Ovarian Removal |
| Study acronym | PROTECTOR |
| Study objectives | Current study objectives as of 14/10/2025: 1. To evaluate the impact on sexual function with ‘Early-Salpingectomy’ and ‘Delayed-Oophorectomy’, as a two-step ovarian cancer prevention strategy in premenopausal women at high-risk of ovarian cancer. 2. To evaluate the level of ovarian cancer risk reduction of risk-reducing early-salpingectomy (RRES) for ovarian cancer prevention in high-risk women. _____ Previous study objectives: 1. Early salpingectomy is non-inferior for sexual function compared to no surgery. 2. Early salpingectomy is superior for sexual function and non-inferior in terms of quality of life compared to the standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. |
| Ethics approval(s) |
Approved 10/09/2025, Bloomsbury REC (2 Redman Place, Stratford, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom; +44 207104 8256; bloomsbury.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 18/LO/0555 |
| Ethics approval additional information | London - Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee, 18/04/2018, ref: 18/LO/0555 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Prevention of ovarian cancer |
| Intervention | Current interventions as of 14/10/2025: Participants who meet the eligibility criteria and who have been identified through various NHS outpatient clinics, GP-surgeries or who have self-referred to the study team, self-select which of the three study arms they wish to participate in: risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO); risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO); controls (no surgery). Baseline investigations Participants enrolled into the two surgical arms (RRESDO/RRSO) have a CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound of the pelvis. Participants in all three arms have a baseline FSH as a measure of ovarian function and are required to complete interventional questionnaires that collect data on medical and reproductive history, socio-demographics, family history of cancers, endocrine symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction, psychological health and cancer risk perception and worry. RRSO arm Participants who have completed their family undergo risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and peritoneal washings. A strict histopathological SEE-FIM based protocol is followed and pathology samples are sent for central pathology review. RRESDO arm Participants undergo surgery in two stages. The first stage involves salpingectomy and peritoneal washings. The second stage involves oophorectomy and peritoneal washings once natural menopause has been reached (or sooner if requested). A strict histopathological SEE-FIM based protocol is followed and pathology samples are sent for central pathology review. Control arm Participants do not undergo surgery but undergo a blood test measuring FSH levels and are required to complete the interventional questionnaires. Qualitative in-depth interviews A small number of women from each of the three study arms are invited to one-to-one semi-structured in depth interviews to explore acceptability, interest, factors influencing decision making and willingness to undergo RRESDO. Women who elected to have surgery are followed up with another interview one year post salpingectomy/RRSO to explore satisfaction with the counselling process and the effects of surgery on health and wellbeing. Follow up All participants are followed up with annual questionnaires for 8 years. Serum FSH levels will be taken annually for 3 years after salpingectomy/control arm; and 3 months after RRSO/delayed oophorectomy. _____ Previous interventions: Participants who meet the eligibility criteria and who have been identified through various NHS outpatient clinics, GP-surgeries or who have self-referred to the study team, self-select which of the three study arms they wish to participate in: risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO); risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO); controls (no surgery). Baseline investigations Participants enrolled into the two surgical arms (RRESDO/RRSO) have a CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound of the pelvis. Participants in all three arms have a baseline FSH as a measure of ovarian function and are required to complete interventional questionnaires that collect data on medical and reproductive history, socio-demographics, family history of cancers, endocrine symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction, psychological health and cancer risk perception and worry. RRSO arm Participants who have completed their family undergo risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and peritoneal washings. A strict histopathological SEE-FIM based protocol is followed and pathology samples are sent for central pathology review.. RRESDO arm Participants who have completed their family undergo surgery in two stages. The first stage involves salpingectomy and peritoneal washings. The second stage involves oophorectomy and peritoneal washings once natural menopause has been reached (or sooner if requested). A strict histopathological SEE-FIM based protocol is followed and pathology samples are sent for central pathology review. Control arm Participants do not undergo surgery but undergo a blood test measuring FSH levels and are required to complete the interventional questionnaires. Qualitative in-depth interviews A small number of women from each of the three study arms are invited to one-to-one semi-structured in depth interviews to explore acceptability, interest, factors influencing decision making and willingness to undergo RRESDO. Women who elected to have surgery are followed up with another interview one year post salpingectomy/RRSO to explore satisfaction with the counselling process and the effects of surgery on health and wellbeing. Follow up All participants are followed up with annual questionnaires and FSH levels (annually after salpingectomy/control arm; 3 months after RRSO/delayed oophorectomy). |
| Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Current primary outcome measure as of 14/10/2025: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Current secondary outcome measures as of 14/10/2025: |
| Completion date | 31/07/2030 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 30 Years |
| Sex | Female |
| Target sample size at registration | 2500 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Current inclusion criteria as of 14/10/2025: 1. Women at increased risk of ovarian cancer: BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers; BRIP1/PALB2/RAD51C/RAD51D mutation carriers; strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer or ovarian cancer alone. 2. Premenopausal 3. Aged ≥30 years. 4. Completed family (for surgical arms) _____ Previous inclusion criteria as of 14/10/2025: 1. Women at increased risk of ovarian cancer: BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers; RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 mutation carriers; strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer or ovarian cancer alone. 2. Premenopausal 3. Aged ≥30 years. 4. Completed family (for surgical arms) |
| Key exclusion criteria | Current exclusion criteria as of 14/10/2025: 1. Previous bilateral-salpingectomy or bilateral-oophorectomy. 2. Postmenopausal (amenorrhoea ≥1year (uterus in situ) / FSH >40). 3. Previous tubal/ovarian/peritoneal malignancy 4. <3 months post cancer treatment 5. Pregnancy 6. Clinical suspicion of tubal/ovarian cancer at baseline 7. Inability to provide informed consent _____ Previous exclusion criteria as of 14/10/2025: 1. Previous bilateral-salpingectomy or bilateral-oophorectomy. 2. Postmenopausal (amenorrhoea ≥1year (uterus in situ) / FSH >40). 3. Previous tubal/ovarian/peritoneal malignancy 4. <12 months post cancer treatment 5. Pregnancy 6. Clinical suspicion of tubal/ovarian cancer at baseline 7. Inability to provide informed consent |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/07/2018 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/07/2030 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
- Northern Ireland
- Scotland
- Wales
Study participating centres
London
E1 1FR
United Kingdom
London
NW1 2BU
United Kingdom
BT9 7AB
United Kingdom
Hills Rd
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
Manchester
M23 9LT
United Kingdom
Grove Lane
Smethwick
B66 2QT
United Kingdom
London
SE1 9RT
United Kingdom
S Wharf Rd
Paddington
London
W2 1NY
United Kingdom
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom
Tunbridge Wells
TN2 4QJ
United Kingdom
Norwich
NR4 7UY
United Kingdom
Gateshead
NE9 6SX
United Kingdom
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom
Brighton
BN2 5BE
United Kingdom
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
CF14 4XW
United Kingdom
London
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Leicester
LE1 5WW
United Kingdom
Portsmouth
PO6 3LY
United Kingdom
Canterbury
CT1 3NG
United Kingdom
Dundee
DD2 1SY
United Kingdom
Southampton
SO16 6YD
United Kingdom
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
Charles Hastings Way
Worcester
WR5 1DD
United Kingdom
Exeter
EX1 2ED
United Kingdom
Holdforth Road
Hartlepool
TS24 9AH
United Kingdom
Crown Street
Liverpool
L8 7SS
United Kingdom
Hollyhurst Road
Darlington
DL3 6HX
United Kingdom
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Guildford
GU2 7XX
United Kingdom
Old Dalkeith Road
Edinburgh
Lothian
EH16 4SA
United Kingdom
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4LP
United Kingdom
Derby
DE22 3NE
United Kingdom
Haslingden Road
Blackburn
BB2 3HH
United Kingdom
Marton Road
Middlesbrough
TS4 3BW
United Kingdom
Gartnavel Royal Hospital
1055 Great Western Road Glasgow
Glasgow
G12 0XH
United Kingdom
Northampton
NN1 5BD
United Kingdom
Treliske
Truro
TR1 3LJ
United Kingdom
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Penrhosgarnedd
Bangor
LL57 2PW
United Kingdom
Bath
BA1 3NG
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Other |
| IPD sharing plan | The data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date. |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol article | protocol | 01/02/2021 | 11/09/2020 | Yes | No |
| HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No | ||
| Participant information sheet | version v4 | 16/04/2018 | 02/04/2019 | No | Yes |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
| Study website | Study website | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Additional files
- ISRCTN25173360_PIS_v4_16Apr2018.pdf
- Uploaded 02/04/2019
Editorial Notes
14/10/2025: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment is suspended until January 2026
2. The study objectives were changed.
3. The completion date was changed from 01/07/2028 to 31/07/2030.
4. The interventions were changed.
5. The primary outcome measures were changed.
6. The secondary outcome measures were changed.
7. The study website was added.
8. The inclusion criteria were changed.
9. The target number of participants, was changed from 1000 to 2500.
10. The exclusion criteria were changed.
11. The date of final enrolment was changed from 01/07/2025 to 31/07/2030.
12. The study participating centres were updated.
13. The plain English summary was updated to reflect these changes.
14. Contact details updated.
10/03/2021: Link to lay summary on CRUK added to the plain English summary.
11/09/2020: Publication reference added.
02/04/2019: The participant information sheet has been uploaded.