Myocardial Injury following Coronary Artery bypass Surgery versus percutaneous coronary Angioplasty with stents: a randomised controlled trial using biochemical markers and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

ISRCTN ISRCTN25699844
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25699844
Secondary identifying numbers 06/Q1606/19
Submission date
23/04/2006
Registration date
06/06/2006
Last edited
24/01/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Adrian Banning
Scientific

Department of Cardiology
Level 2
Headley Way
Headington
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 228 934
Email adrian.banning@orh.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised clinical trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study acronymMICASA
Study objectivesIn patients with multivessel and/or left main Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) compared with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) results in less frequent heart muscle injury, as measured by cardiac troponin I and delayed enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Secondarily, that percutaneous coronary intervention offers equivalent revascularisation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery as measured by MRI perfusion.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the Oxfordshire Local Research Ethics Committee on the 17th March 2006 (ref: 06/Q1606/19).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMultivessel coronary artery disease
InterventionCoronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe frequency of new myocardial injury following PCI and CABG as assessed by biochemical markers (troponin I) and MRI.
Secondary outcome measures1. Total amount of new myocardial necrosis (in grams) assessed by MRI
2. Change in left ventricular function assessed by MRI
Overall study start date01/06/2006
Completion date31/12/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants60
Key inclusion criteria1. Patients with greater than or equal to two vessel CAD (greater than or equal to 50% stenosis) including the Left Anterior Descending (LAD), and/or a functionally significant left main stem stenosis of 50% or more
2. Equivalent revascularisation can be provided by PCI and CABG
3. Angina (stable or unstable), or documented silent ischaemia on functional stress testing
Key exclusion criteria1. Contraindication to aspirin or clopidogrel
2. Women of childbearing potential
3. Non-viable myocardium in the area subtended by diseased vessels
4. Patients requiring concomitant cardiac surgery
5. Acute myocardial infarction
Date of first enrolment01/06/2006
Date of final enrolment31/12/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Cardiology
Headington
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research and Development
Manor House
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley Way
Headington
OX3 9DU
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03h2bh287

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Cordis, a division of Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd (UK) - Dr William van Gaal is funded by the Clinical Cardiology Research Scholarship

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2011 Yes No
Results article results 08/02/2011 Yes No
Results article results 01/12/2011 Yes No
Results article results 01/06/2013 Yes No