Gamified naming therapy versus traditional speech-language pathology for post-stroke anomia in Arabic speakers

ISRCTN ISRCTN25938988
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25938988
Sponsor Dhahran Health Center
Funder Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare
Submission date
07/04/2026
Registration date
08/04/2026
Last edited
08/04/2026
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Yusuf Albustanji
Principal investigator, Scientific, Public

Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare
Dhahran
4321
Saudi Arabia

Phone +966 0502702885
Email yusufmohammed.albustanji@JHAH.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingBlinded (masking used)
ControlActive
AssignmentParallel
PurposeDiagnostic, Treatment
Scientific titleGamified naming therapy versus traditional speech-language pathology for post-stroke anomia in Arabic speakers: a randomised pilot trial
Study objectives Traditional speech-language pathology services face structural limitations: the global Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) shortage constrains access, particularly in the Middle East, and therapy is typically limited to one to two hours per week — far below the intensive dosage required for consolidation of lexical-retrieval improvements. Computerised naming treatment platforms can deliver high-dose practice with real-time feedback. Gamification — the application of game-design principles to non-game contexts — has demonstrated clinical utility in motor and cognitive rehabilitation. The iTalkBetter Phase II randomised trial demonstrated that AI-driven gamified digital therapy achieved significant improvements in chronic aphasia naming. Systematic reviews confirm high feasibility and safety of digital interventions for post-stroke language rehabilitation. No prior study has delivered gamified naming therapy within a fully Arabic-language platform, nor compared such a platform against a controlled comparator condition in a randomised design.

This study has two primary objectives:
(1) a detailed technical description of the Naming Gaming App platform;
(2) a randomised pilot trial comparing gamified app-based therapy to an equated-contact-time traditional SLP comparator in Arabic-speaking adults with post-stroke anomia. As a pilot trial, the primary purpose is signal detection and feasibility evidence to power a definitive multisite RCT, not to provide conclusive efficacy evidence.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 28/01/2026, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, 2894 Floor 1 Dhahran Blvd, Dhahran, 34465, Saudi Arabia; +966 013 877 9000; yusufmohammed.albustanji@JHAH.com), ref: IRB # 24-04-039

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPost stroke aphasia
InterventionArabic-speaking adults with confirmed post-stroke anomia (≥3 months post-onset) were randomly allocated (1:1, block randomisation, allocation concealment) to an Experimental Group (EG; n = 12) receiving 15 supervised gamified app sessions (45 min, 3×/week, five weeks), or a Control Group (CG; n = 12) receiving an equated-contact-time comparator condition of traditional SLP (2×/week, five weeks; total contact time equated at 675 minutes). Independent blinded assessors administered all outcome probes. Primary outcomes were trained item naming accuracy (/30) and untrained item generalisation (/30) at baseline and post-treatment. A post-hoc power analysis will be reported.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Trained item naming accuracy (/30) and untrained item generalisation accuracy (/30) measured using the Reliable Change Index (RCI) by a blinded independent assessor at baseline, five weeks of treatment and post treatment
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. A-CAT Aphasia Quotient (/100) and naming subtest (/20); naming latency; object vs. action naming (/15 each); error-type classification; four-week maintenance probes measured using the Reliable Change Index (RCI) by a blinded independent assessor at baseline, five weeks of treatment and post treatment
Completion date14/03/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit24 Years
Upper age limit78 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration24
Total final enrolment24
Key inclusion criteria1. Acquired aphasia following a single left-hemisphere stroke, confirmed by neuroimaging
2. Arabic as primary spoken language
3. Anomia confirmed by A-CAT naming subtest
4. ≥3 months post-stroke onset (revised from the initially planned ≥4 weeks threshold to minimise the contribution of acute spontaneous recovery)
5. Adequate vision and hearing to engage with app interface or clinic-based materials
6. Capacity to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Participants with progressive neurological conditions
2. Significant cognitive impairment
3. Prior app-based therapy within the preceding six months
Date of first enrolment07/01/2026
Date of final enrolment14/03/2026

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Saudi Arabia

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Editorial Notes

08/04/2026: Study’s existence confirmed by the Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare Institutional Review Board (JHAH IRB), Saudi Arabia.