Randomised trial of detrusor botulinum toxin injection compared to placebo in idiopathic detrusor overactivity
ISRCTN | ISRCTN26091555 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN26091555 |
Secondary identifying numbers | UHL 9735 and 2004-002981-39 |
- Submission date
- 11/04/2005
- Registration date
- 26/05/2005
- Last edited
- 14/02/2013
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Douglas Tincello
Scientific
Scientific
Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building
PO Box 65
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester
LE2 7LX
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)116 252 3165 |
---|---|
dgt4@le.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Not specified |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | |
Study acronym | RELAX |
Study objectives | The principal research objectives for this trial are: 1. To determine the efficacy of detrusor muscle botulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) injection at relieving symptoms of detrusor overactivity 2. To examine the side effects and complications of detrusor muscle BOTOX® injection 3. To collect basic cost effectiveness data including EuroQol 5D data to allow simple cost effectiveness calculations to be done |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Detrusor overactivity |
Intervention | Prior to 16/03/10: Women will be randomised to receive either a single treatment with 200 IU of botulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) into the detrusor muscle (10 units in 1 ml in 20 separate sites, sparing the trigone), or a single treatment of injection of normal saline (placebo) (20 separate injections of 1 ml) into the detrusor muscle. Modified 16/03/10: Women will be randomised to receive either a single treatment with 200 IU of botulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) into the detrusor muscle (10 units in 1 ml in 20 separate sites, sparing the trigone), or a single treatment of injection of placebo (injection vehicle) into the detrusor muscle. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Diary recorded urinary voiding frequency per 24 hours measured at 6 months. A minimum of two complete diary days will be accepted as valid data. A window of 2 to +8 weeks around the 6 month follow up visit will be allowed. |
Secondary outcome measures | a. Diary measures 1. Urgency episode frequency/24 hours at 3 and 6 months 2. Incontinence episode frequency at 3 and 6 months 3. Urgency severity assessed by IUSS26 at 3 and 6 months b. Questionnaire measures 1. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire short form score (ICIQ-SF) 2. Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL) questionnaire score c. Physical measures 1. Incidence of complications (including voiding dysfunction, urinary tract infection, haematuria, dysuria, reported muscle weakness) 2. Need for additional treatment during follow up, defined as a new prescription for drugs, or a new referral for other therapies 3. Interval between treatment and patient reported return of troublesome symptoms d. Health economics 1. EuroQol 5D data compared between baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months follow up 2. Estimated costs of each treatment, using reported health care contacts at 6 weeks and 6 months |
Overall study start date | 01/02/2006 |
Completion date | 31/10/2010 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Female |
Target number of participants | 240 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. 8 weeks of continued treatment with oral anticholinergic medication, with a screening Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale score of 'a little better' or 'worse'. This point of the scale represents a reduction of incontinence episode frequency of around 50% (Slack, unpublished data). 2. 8 weeks of continued treatment, with a verbal response that the treatment has not provided acceptable improvement 3. Treatment stopped because of side effects within 8 weeks 4. Previous treatments stopped because of lack of efficacy, and currently receiving no treatment Additionally, patients will report at least 8 voids per 24 hours, with at least 2 urgency episodes per 24 hours. Urgency episodes will be defined as those rated as 'moderate' or higher on the Urgency severity scale, and urge incontinence episodes will be defined as recorded leakage in association with an urgency episode. |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients with known multiple sclerosis, stroke, spinal injury, or other neurological disease 2. Patients with pre-existing voiding dysfunction (flow rate less than 5th centile, or post void residual volume greater than 100 ml) 3. Patients fulfilling the exclusion criteria for the licensed indications of botulinum toxin (myasethenia gravis and Eaton Lambert syndrome, or allergy to constituents of BOTOX® injection) 4. Patients with co-existing urodynamic stress incontinence |
Date of first enrolment | 01/02/2006 |
Date of final enrolment | 31/10/2010 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building
Leicester
LE2 7LX
United Kingdom
LE2 7LX
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre
Hospital/treatment centre
Research and Development Office
Leicester General Hospital
Gwendolen Road
Leicester
LE5 4PW
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)116 249 0490 |
---|---|
Carolyn.maloney@uhl-tr.nhs.uk | |
https://ror.org/02fha3693 |
Funders
Funder type
Charity
Moulton Charitable Trust (UK)
No information available
Added 16./03/10: Wellbeing of Women (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/09/2012 | Yes | No | |
Results article | results | 01/01/2013 | Yes | No |