Efficacy of humanistic counselling in schools for emotional wellbeing

ISRCTN ISRCTN27026136
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN27026136
Secondary identifying numbers UEC0809/19
Submission date
22/12/2009
Registration date
22/02/2010
Last edited
12/07/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Ms Katherine McArthur
Scientific

University of Strathclyde
76 Southbrae Drive
Glasgow
G13 1PP
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)141 950 3143
Email katherine.mcarthur@strath.ac.uk

Study information

Study designSingle centre randomised controlled pilot study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleEfficacy of humanistic counselling in schools for emotional wellbeing: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Study acronymSCOOLS II
Study objectivesFor young people (13 - 18 years old) experiencing psychological distress, weekly counselling will be more effective than waiting list conditions.
Ethics approval(s)University of Strathclyde Ethics Committee approved on the 9th December 2009
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedEmotional wellbeing
InterventionCounselling:
Young people will be offered weekly counselling for up to one school term. The nature of the counselling is therapeutic rather than advice- or career-orientated, and is based on the competences for humanistic psychological therapies developed at University College London through funding from Skills for Health. Counselling, defined in this way, puts particular emphasis on the development of a trusting relationship between the therapist and client, and tries to understand the client's 'world' from their point of view. Counsellors are BACP accredited practitioners or equivalent, working within a set of professional ethical guidelines for counselling and psychotherapy. They have experience of working in humanistic ways with young people. A selection of session recordings will be audited by the research team to monitor adherence to humanistic psychological therapy competences.

Waiting list:
Young people allocated to the control condition will not be offered any formal counselling intervention for the school term. However, they will be informed that they can access the school's full pastoral care provision at any point during the trial. At the endpoint assessment, participants in the waiting list condition will be offered the option of direct entry to counselling in the following school term.

Follow-up assessments on both arms will be in the middle of the school term (approximately 5 - 6 weeks after baseline assessment) and at the end of the school term (approximately 10 - 12 weeks after baseline assessment).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureCurrent information as of 23/03/2010:
Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation for Young People (YP-CORE), measured at baseline, midpoint and endpoint.

Initial information at time of registration:
Emotional Symptom Score on SDQ (SDQ-ES), measured at baseline, midpoint and endpoint.
Secondary outcome measuresAmendments as of 23/03/2010:
As of the above date, point 2 of the secondary outcomes measures has been changed to the following (all timepoints remain the same):
2. Emotional Symptom Score on SDQ (SDQ-ES)

Initial information at time of registration:
Measured at baseline, midpoint and endpoint:
1. Total Difficulties Score on SDQ (SDQ-TD)
2. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation for Young People (YP-CORE)
3. Self-Esteem (SEQ)
4. Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ)
5. Self-rated change (goal-based outcomes)
6. Adapted Change Interview (for clients)
7. Adapted Change Interview (for waitlist)
Overall study start date11/01/2010
Completion date30/06/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit13 Years
Upper age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants10
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 13 to 18 years, either sex
2. Experiencing borderline or abnormally high levels of emotional distress, as indicated by a score of 5 or above on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Emotional Symptoms Subscale at assessment
3. Motivated to attend counselling, as indicated at assessment
4. Capable of consenting to participate in research, as indicated by a member of the pastoral care team
5. Greater than 85 per cent attendance at school, as indicated by a member of the pastoral care team
Key exclusion criteria1. Risk of significant harm to self or other, as indicated by a member of the pastoral care team and the researcher at assessment
2. Involvement with other child and young people mental health agencies as indicated by a member of the pastoral care team and/or the young person at assessment
3. Planning/likely to move school during period of study, as indicated by a member of the pastoral care team and/or the young person at assessment
Date of first enrolment11/01/2010
Date of final enrolment30/06/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

University of Strathclyde
Glasgow
G13 1PP
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Strathclyde (UK)
University/education

76 Southbrae Drive
Glasgow
G13 1PP
Scotland
United Kingdom

Email sarah.currie@strath.ac.uk
Website http://www.strath.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00n3w3b69

Funders

Funder type

Government

Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Trust (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/10/2013 Yes No