Randomised Exposure Study of Pollution Indoors and Respiratory Effects (RESPIRE): the effect of reducing exposure to smoke from traditional woodstoves on child pneumonia in rural Guatemala
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN29007942 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN29007942 |
| Protocol serial number | NIEHS #R01ES010178 |
| Sponsor | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (USA) - National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) |
| Funders | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (USA) - National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (ref: R01ES010178), World Health Organization (WHO) (Switzerland), The AC Griffin Family Trust (USA) |
- Submission date
- 22/09/2009
- Registration date
- 14/10/2009
- Last edited
- 16/11/2011
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Respiratory
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
School of Public Health
University of California
Berkeley
94720-7360
United States of America
| Phone | +1 510 643 0793 |
|---|---|
| krksmith@berkeley.edu |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Single centre randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Woodsmoke exposure and childhood acute lower respiratory infections in Guatemala: a randomised intervention |
| Study acronym | RESPIRE |
| Study objectives | Acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) incidence in children and pollution exposure will be reduced in the intervention group (children who reside in a household with a chimney woodstove) versus the control group (children who reside in a household that uses an open woodfire for cooking and heating). Acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) are the chief killer of children. Most cases are pneumonia and the majority occur among poor children under five years in developing countries. Poverty might be said to be the primary cause, which manifests as malnutrition, including micro-nutrient deficiencies, and lack of access to medical care. Another attribute of poverty is household indoor air pollution (HAP) from use of unprocessed solid fuels such as biomass (wood, animal dung and crop wastes) and coal in simple stoves. A meta-analysis of published observational studies found that young children exposed to smoke from household solid fuel use had a rate of ALRI twice that of children not exposed or where clean fuels were used. Recent studies have shown similar ALRI risks associated with short-term air pollution measurements and other indicators of exposure. The substantial indoor concentrations of important health-damaging pollutants which result from the use of these fuels are thought to explain the relationship with ALRI. As with tobacco smoke, there are thousands of compounds in gaseous and aerosol forms found in biomass fuel smoke, including dozens with effects that include immune system suppression, severe irritation, inflammation, cilia toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Small particles are typically used as an indicator of the health risk for these mixtures, and in households using biomass fuels without effective chimneys are typically found in concentrations 10 to 100 times higher than health-based guidelines. Viral agents play an important role in ALRI, although it is thought that most deaths occur through bacterial infection, which may occur with or without initial viral infection. Of the viral agents, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common, although its importance varies by season. Evidence to date about the relationship between solid fuel smoke pollution and risk of RSV illness, is conflicting. One study from the Gambia reported reduced risk of severe RSV illness with higher exposure to cooking smoke, raising the possibility of a differential effect on viral and bacterial ALRI. The evidence from existing studies of ALRI risk associated with solid fuel use is limited by a range of methodological issues. All used observational designs which carry the inherent difficulty of residual confounding from the association between solid fuels and other poverty-related ALRI risk factors, particularly nutrition. Studies used a mix of hospital and community-based case-finding: those using the latter will have had particular difficulty distinguishing lower respiratory tract infections from acute upper respiratory tract infections (AURI). This is important as the more common AURI may have a quite different relationship with air pollution, and is not responsible for significant morbidity or mortality. Since few studies have assessed indicators of ALRI severity (e.g. hypoxaemia), and none has attempted to differentiate all ALRI by aetiologic agent (viral versus bacterial), it has not been possible to assess the impact of HAP on factors known to increase case fatality. Almost none of the studies carried out pollution assessment, relying instead on indirect exposure indicators such as fuel or stove type, or whether a child is carried on the mother's back during cooking - methods which are inevitably associated with substantial exposure misclassification. Finally, lack of blinding may have led to bias. |
| Ethics approval(s) | 1. Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, University of California Berkeley, approved in October 2002 and renewed anuually (ref: 2003-8-165) 2. Institutional Review Board, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Government, approved in August 2002 (ref: 3452) 3. Ethics Committee Review Board, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, approved on the 11th October 2002 and renewed annually 4. Research Ethics Committee, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, approved on the 10th October 2001 and renewed annually (ref: 01.68) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Acute respiratory tract infection (ARI) in children under 18 months |
| Intervention | The intervention group was offered a chimney stove (plancha) at the beginning of the study. The improved chimney stove was locally made, well-liked by people in the community, and the stove of choice for both independent buyers and community stove programmes. Pilot work confirmed that the plancha met all cooking and space-heating needs, achieved a 8 - 10 fold reduction in kitchen pollution levels and (depending on design, condition and how it was used) a modest saving in wood fuel in everyday use. The control group continued to use the traditional open fire, in effect with no change to usual practice. All control households were offered an improved stove to be installed on completion of household surveillance (when child reached 18 months). |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Physician-diagnosed pneumonia in children through 18 months of age. Pneumonia case finding and management were based on the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) Strategy, developed by World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). This approach was selected because: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Derived from the case finding methods described above: |
| Completion date | 18/12/2004 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Other |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 500 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Households used only an open fire for cooking and heating 2. Had a pregnant woman or child less than 4 months residing in the home 3. Identified as Mam (the regional ethnic group) 4. Minimal summer migration (less than 12 weeks per year) |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. The household is already using a chimney stove for cooking 2. There is no child less than 4 months of age or a pregnant woman residing in the home 3. Seasonal migration required the family to move to another region for more than 12 weeks of the year |
| Date of first enrolment | 19/10/2002 |
| Date of final enrolment | 18/12/2004 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Guatemala
- United States of America
Study participating centre
94720-7360
United States of America
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/01/2007 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | blood pressure results | 01/07/2007 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | pneumonia case findings results | 01/07/2007 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | mapping results | 01/10/2007 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | lung function results | 01/12/2007 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | self-rated health results | 05/06/2008 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | exposure information results | 01/01/2009 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | results | 15/07/2009 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | 13/10/2009 | Yes | No | ||
| Results article | methods and results | 01/07/2010 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | results | 12/11/2011 | Yes | No | |
| Abstract results | 01/11/2006 | No | No | ||
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
| Study website | Study website | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |