Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy: one year follow up
ISRCTN | ISRCTN31135824 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN31135824 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N0436125589 |
- Submission date
- 30/09/2004
- Registration date
- 30/09/2004
- Last edited
- 06/10/2009
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mr D G Jayne
Scientific
Scientific
Academic Unit of Surgeons
Level 8
Clinical Sciences Building
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)113 2065122 |
---|---|
r&d@leedsth.nhs.uk |
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Scientific title | |
Study objectives | To compare the long-term results of ligasure with conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of symptomatic grade III and IV haemorrhoids. |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Haemorrhoidectomy |
Intervention | Randomised controlled trial; Before-after trial. Random Allocation to: 1. Ligasure 2. Conventional Treatment |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasound were not included in the original trial so there is no data for direct comparison. However this information is important to correlate patient symptomatology with quantitative assessment of sphincter anatomy and function. |
Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
Overall study start date | 01/03/2003 |
Completion date | 01/09/2003 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 40 |
Key inclusion criteria | All 40 previous participants of the Ligasure versus conventional diathermy study |
Key exclusion criteria | Does not match inclusion criteria |
Date of first enrolment | 01/03/2003 |
Date of final enrolment | 01/09/2003 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Academic Unit of Surgeons
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Department of Health
Government
Government
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
Website | http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en |
---|
Funders
Funder type
Hospital/treatment centre
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/07/2005 | Yes | No |