Early oral feeding versus traditional route in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis: a randomised controlled trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN32134673
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN32134673
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
03/10/2005
Registration date
18/01/2006
Last edited
16/10/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Khosro Ayazi
Scientific

General Surgery Department
Imam Hossein University Hospital
Shaheed Madani St
Tehran
16179
Iran

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesA period of starvation 'nil by mouth' is a common practice after GI anastomosis. The stomach is decompressed with a nasogastric tube and intravenous fluid is administrated. Then oral feeding begins after gastric dysmotility is resolved.
The rational of 'nil by mouth' is to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting, in addition to providing the anastomosis some time before being stressed by food. In another words, patients are nil per os ('NPO') to prevent early complications (nausea and vomiting) and late complications of an anastomosis such as peritonitis, abscess and sepsis due to leakages of intestinal fluids into peritoneal cavity.
Contrary to the above opinion, there is evidence suggesting early feeding is beneficial.
It has been shown in animals that the 'NPO' period reduces the collagen content in anastomosed tissue and diminishes the quality of healing. Whereas feeding reverses mucosal atrophy induced by starvation and increases collagen deposition and strength of the site of anastomosis. Since a great number of GI surgeries are undertaken in malnourished patients, providing them with a chance to increase their depleted collagen storage after surgery is wise. Moreover, there are clinical investigations showing that early feeding is associated with improved wound healing and reduces septic morbidity after abdominal trauma and peritonitis. Some other studies suppose that early feeding minimizes the length of hospitalization. Additionally there are studies suggesting no significant difference in any feeding routes.
Most of the studies are surgical site specific. But this study takes all GI anastomosis into consideration, which might lead to a more general comment.
Considering the lack of data from Iran health providers on the matter, the study may also provide some help to choose more appropriate routes for our patients.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDifferent gastrointestinal pathologies lead to GI surgeries.
InterventionNasogastric tubes were removed immediately after surgery in both groups.
In group I (early feeding) patients, oral feeding began on the first postoperative day with liquid diet and gradually changed to normal diet as tolerated.
In group II (traditional route) feeding began with the same diet after resolution of ileus. That was defined by audible bowel sound plus no abdominal distension or vomiting.
In the case of vomiting more than twice, the nasogastric tube was reinserted in both groups.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureDecreasing the early and late complications as below:
1. Early complications (inability to tolerate oral feeding, presented with nausea and vomiting)
2. Delayed complications (due to leakage from anastomosis, such as peritonitis, abscess and sepsis, in addition to fistula and death)
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/03/2001
Completion date01/03/2003

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participants150
Key inclusion criteria1. Being a candidate for GI anastomosis
2. Being a volunteer for participation
Key exclusion criteria1. Peritonitis
2. Albumin level <3 mg/dl
3. Age <4 years old
4. Previous history of autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
5. Previous abdominal surgery
6. History of endocrine disease
7. Diabetes mellitus
8. Heart valve diseases or atherosclerosis
9. History of surgery due to abdominal trauma
Date of first enrolment01/03/2001
Date of final enrolment01/03/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Iran

Study participating centre

General Surgery Department
Tehran
16179
Iran

Sponsor information

Imam Hossein University Hospital (Iran)
Hospital/treatment centre

Shaheed Madani St
Tehran
16179
Iran

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04esb6v42

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

It is an internally funded project by the General Surgery Department of Imam Hossein University Hospital (Iran)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan