OSL Belly Board in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy for rectal cancer

ISRCTN ISRCTN32235141
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN32235141
Protocol serial number N0013164858
Sponsor Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health
Funder Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (UK), NHS R&D Support Funding
Submission date
29/09/2006
Registration date
29/09/2006
Last edited
05/05/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Stephen Morris
Scientific

St Thomas' Hospital
Radiotherapy
Lambeth Wing
Lambeth Palace Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

Phone +44 020 7188 1459
Email stephen.l.morris@gstt.nhs.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleOSL Belly Board in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy for rectal cancer
Study objectivesAs part of our service development programme to improve patient immobilisation systems for the delivery of radiotherapy with new techniques we want to investigate a belly board system for our patients treated in the prone position for Rectal Cancer. The principle questions are whether the belly board will improve the reproducibility of the patient's position and reduce the amount of small bowel within the radiation fields.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedCancer: Rectal
InterventionA randomised trial designed to test the null hypothesis 'whether the Belly Board will improve the reproducibility of the patient's position and reduce the amount of small bowel within the radiation fields'.
25 patients will be randomised to be treated on the Board and 25 patients recruited as controls. Patients in the Belly Board arm of the study will need two CT scans, one on the Board to plan their treatment and one in the normal position so that the amount of small bowel in the radiation field can be compared within the same patient in the two different positions.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. The reproducibility of the patients position in our standard prone set up compared with that using the Belly Board
2. The small bowel volume within the radiation fields in our standard prone set up compared with that using the Belly Board

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. To compare the patient comfort and ease of set up using our standard prone set up compared with that using the Belly Board
2. To compare the acute toxicity of radiotherapy delivered using our standard prone set up with that using the Belly Board

Completion date30/09/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration50
Key inclusion criteria50 patients who have histopathologically confirmed, resectable Rectal Adenocarcinoma who will be undergoing pelvic radiotherapy.

Inclusion criteria are:
1. Histopathology confirmed, resectable rectal adenocarcinoma
2. No prior pelvic radiotherapy
3. Staging CT Chest Abdomen and Pelvis excludes metastases
4. MRI staging T3/4 or N1 or T2 lower third rectal tumours
5. Age > 18
6. KPS > 70 and independently mobile to get onto the belly board
7. No contraindications to 5FU chemotherapy
8. Informed consent obtained
9. Subject able to fit into CT scanner on belly board
Key exclusion criteriaNot meeting any of the inclusion criteria.
Date of first enrolment01/03/2005
Date of final enrolment30/09/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

St Thomas' Hospital
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2014 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

05/05/2016: Publication reference added