The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain and disabilities in the treatment of patients with chronic pain
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN32619262 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN32619262 |
| Protocol serial number | N/A |
| Sponsor | The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (Netherlands) |
| Funder | The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (Netherlands) (ref: 940-31-053) |
- Submission date
- 15/09/2010
- Registration date
- 27/09/2010
- Last edited
- 20/11/2012
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Signs and Symptoms
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
645 Department of Physiotherapy
Geert Grooteplein 10
Nijmegen
6500 HB
Netherlands
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Single centre prospective double blind randomised placebo controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | The short and long-term effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain and disabilities in the treatment of patients with chronic benign pain: a randomised double-blind placebo (sham TENS) controlled clinical trial |
| Study objectives | Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an easy to use analgesic intervention for the treatment of pain. However, although TENS treatment exists since the early 1970s, for chronic pain its effects are still inconclusive. Importantly, It is assumed that the analgesic effect of TENS declines in time by repeated application, threatening the use for chronic pain. Furthermore, it is assumed that improvements lasting for more than three months cannot be attributed to placebo effects. However, long-term randomised placebo controlled TENS studies with treatment periods of more than three months, have not been executed. We therefore explored the short and long-term time courses of the analgesic effects of repeated TENS application compared to sham TENS in patients with chronic pain, for a maximum period of one year. |
| Ethics approval(s) | The committee for Research on Human Subjects of Arnhem-Nijmegen (Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek Regio Arnhem-Nijmegen), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre approved on the 7th May 1999 (ref: CWOM-nr.: 9906-0116) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Chronic pain (non-cancer) |
| Intervention | Patients will be randomised to receive either: 1. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): pulse frequency is set to 80 Hz and pulse width to 0.50 ms, intensity: strong tingling, not pricking sensation. Electrode placement at the sites of hyperalgesia. 2. Placebo: Sham-TENS; same device and application, however no current to the electrodes. Both groups receive daily treatments for a maximum period of one year. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Proportion of patients satisfied with treatment result and willing to continue treatment. From patients who ceased treatment because they were no longer satisfied with treatment result, the date of cessation of treatment is used for survival analysis. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Overall improvement: a percentage change from baseline; nil percent meaning no improvement at all and hundred percent meaning complete recovery. |
| Completion date | 26/01/2004 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 165 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Patients with chronic non-cancer pain referred to the Pain Centre 2. Duration of pain greater than 6 months 3. Age above 18 years, male and female |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Previous TENS treatment 2. Pain in face or head 3. Several unrelated sites of pain 4. History of a cerebral vascular accident 5. No assistance at home - e.g. relatives or friends - to help replace or connect the electrodes 6. Involvement in ongoing litigation because of their pain 7. Psychological intervention proposed by the Pain Centre psychologists |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/01/2000 |
| Date of final enrolment | 26/01/2004 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Netherlands
Study participating centre
6500 HB
Netherlands
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/09/2006 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | results | 01/05/2008 | Yes | No | |
| Results article | results | 01/09/2012 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |