Comparison of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for extubated patients who fail a single spontaneous breathing trial vs conventional weaning

ISRCTN ISRCTN32810409
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN32810409
Protocol serial number N0046182290
Sponsor Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
Funder Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Submission date
28/09/2007
Registration date
28/09/2007
Last edited
15/03/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Fang Gao
Scientific

Department of Anaesthetics
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
Bordelsey Green East
Birmingham
B9 5SS
United Kingdom

Phone +44
Email fang.smith@heartofengland.nhs.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleComparison of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for extubated patients who fail a single spontaneous breathing trial vs conventional weaning
Study acronymNEXT
Study objectivesThe aim of this prospective randomised controlled study is to determine if patients who are attached to a breathing machine (ventilator) by a tube in the mouth who are unable to breathe unaided (invasive ventilation) can be safely removed from the ventilator and maintained with ventilation via a face mask (noninvasive ventilation) for approximately 24 hours before withdrawal of NIV support.
Ethics approval(s)Added September 2008: East Birmingham Local Research Ethical Committee (UK) Reference number 06/Q2703/19, May 2006.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedRespiratory: Positive pressure ventilation
InterventionNoninvasive positive pressure ventilation vs conventional weaning
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Duration of time with breathing support tube in the mouth in days

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Length of intensive care unit and hospital stay in days

Completion date31/12/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
Lower age limit18 Years
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration90
Key inclusion criteria1. Patients will need to meet the criteria for reducing breathing support - will not be weaned until physiologically ready.
2. Patients will have to be on a breathing machine attached to a tube in the mouth for at least 48 hours - patients who are on a breathing machine for <48 hours are not seen as difficult to wean from a ventilator
3. Age > 18 years - patient should be able to make own legal judgements to treatment
4. Written informed consent obtained - unethical to carry out study without consent
5. Failed an attempt to try breathing without help - study only being carried out on people who have difficulty with weaning
Key exclusion criteriaAdded September 2008:
1. Patients who are generally not suitable for noninvasive ventilationGrade III/IV intubation
2. Gastric/oesophageal surgery on this admission
3. Patients who it has been decided would not be for re-intubation once extubated
Date of first enrolment13/03/2006
Date of final enrolment31/12/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Department of Anaesthetics
Birmingham
B9 5SS
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

15/03/2016: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.