A prospective randomised controlled trial of open access endoscopy and near patient testing for Helicobacter pylori antibodies in primary care

ISRCTN ISRCTN34856269
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN34856269
Secondary identifying numbers PSI03-07
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
01/04/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof FDR Hobbs
Scientific

The Department of Primary Care and General Practice
Medical School
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 414 3765
Email f.d.r.hobbs@bham.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesDyspepsia is common, with an incidence of 2 'new episodes' per 1000 population per year. However, dyspepsia is also a lifelong intermittent and relapsing disorder, with as many as a third of the adult population suffering dyspeptic symptoms in a year. General practitioners have been encouraged to endoscope patients over the age of 50 years, particularly those with recent onset or continuous symptoms, on account of the potential to detect early gastric cancer. However, early gastric cancer is rare and a large number of patients would need to be investigated to detect one case. Malignancy is extremely rare under the age of 50 and current guidelines have concentrated on reducing endoscopy workload by filtering out patients testing negative for Helicobacter pylori, on the basis that they are unlikely to have peptic ulceration, and could be treated with empirical acid suppression, rather than H. pylori eradication therapy.

This study was conducted as two identical randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the intervention differing by the age of the patient:
1. For patients of 50 years and over we aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of initial endoscopy compared to usual management
2. For patients under the age of 50 years we aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the H. pylori 'test and endoscope' strategy for managing dyspepsia
Ethics approval(s)Obtained from all local research ethics committees
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPeptic ulcer disease
InterventionUnder 50 years: Near patient testing for H. pylori (Helisal rapid blood, Cortecs diagnostics, UK) and open-access endoscopy if positive
Over 50 years: initial open access endoscopy
Controls: prescribing or specialist referral at GP's discretion
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureCost-effectiveness based on symptomatic improvement and health resource utilisation for dyspepsia at 12 months.
Secondary outcome measures1. Quality of life (QoL)
2. Patient satisfaction
Overall study start date01/03/1995
Completion date01/10/1999

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants430
Key inclusion criteria1. Dyspeptic patients
2. Aged 18 years and over (either sex)
3. Helicobacter pylori positive
Key exclusion criteria1. Previous endoscopy
2. Positive barium meal examination in the past three years
3. Unable to give informed consent
4. Unfit for endoscopy
Date of first enrolment01/03/1995
Date of final enrolment01/10/1999

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

The Department of Primary Care and General Practice
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Record Provided by the NHS R&D 'Time-Limited' National Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

NHS Primary and Secondary Care Interface National Research and Development Programme (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 14/04/2001 Yes No