The effects of pomegranate mouth rinses on oral health

ISRCTN ISRCTN34881910
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN34881910
Secondary identifying numbers 272/2011
Submission date
23/09/2025
Registration date
24/09/2025
Last edited
24/09/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Natural herbal mouth rinses are made of natural, plant-based ingredients that highlight body/mind health and wellness and are promoted as “alternatives” to the conventional over-the-counter cosmetic and therapeutic oral rinses. Therefore, this study was undertaken to assess the action of pomegranate bark extract on de novo plaque formation, compared to digluconate chlorhexidine.

Who can participate?
Healthy adult patients of both genders

What does the study involve?
The study will consist of mouthwashes after brushing teeth in the morning and evening (12-hour intervals). The mouthwashes will be 10 ml with one of three substances (placebo, 0.12% chlorhexidine, and 10% Punica granatum (pomegranate bark extract), which are used for for 1 minute for 3 consecutive days.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The expected benefits of the study are to prove the effectiveness of pomegranate peel extract as an aid in controlling plaque. Once this product is commercialized, it will be easily accessible to all social classes, demonstrating the importance of researching alternative and economically viable methods through phytotherapy.

The mouthwash procedure may cause some unpleasant taste sensations. This minimal risk will be reduced by adding products that improve the taste of the products, such as flavorings. Dental prophylaxis will be performed after the end of the study, after three days, to eliminate all remaining plaque. This period is well described in the scientific literature and poses no irreversible risk and does not cause damage to teeth and gums. Plaque will be controlled, as the most effective means of plaque control, toothbrushing, will not be discontinued.

Where is the study run from?
University of Fortaleza, Brazil

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2011 to July 2016

Who is funding the study?
University of Fortaleza, Brazil

Who is the main contact?
Arlândia Cristina Lima Nobre de Morais, arlandia@unifor.br

Contact information

Prof Sérgio Luís da Silva Pereira
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator

Rua Romeu Aldigueri, 101 - Apto. 401 Torre Norte - Bairro Guararapes
Fortaleza
60810-190
Brazil

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-0309-5159
Phone +55 (85) 3477-3259
Email luiss@unifor.br

Study information

Study designRandomized double-blind crossover trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised cross over trial
Study setting(s)Care home, Pharmacy, University/medical school/dental school
Study typePrevention, Safety, Efficacy
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titlePomegranate in mouth rinses on de novo plaque formation: a double-blind clinical study
Study objectivesThe present study aimed to assess the action of this herbal agent on de novo plaque formation, compared to digluconate chlorhexidine.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 27/09/2011, Coética Unifor (Av. Washington Soares, 1321 - Edson Queiroz, Fortaleza, 60811905, Brazil; +55 (85) 3477-3000; coetica@unifor.br), ref: 11-335

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPrevention of supragingival biofilm accumulation on tooth surfaces in healthy subjects
InterventionPreparation of the mouth rinses
Initially, 1ml of essential oil was diluted in 9 ml of distilled water (1:9), preparing a 10% mixture (V/V) (Pg solution). A mouth rinse containing just distilled water (DW solution) and another containing 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (CLX solution) were formulated too. In all groups, a very small amount of menthol (flavoring), color and conserving agent were added.

Clinical design
This study was a randomized, double-blind comparison of 3 crossover groups of dental students performed in 3 experimental phases of 3 days each, with a 1-month washout interval between them until all subjects had rinsed with each formulation. To standardize the groups, the participants were submitted to a meticulous evaluation (pre-experimental phase) to score the Plaque Index (PLI) (11) of each tooth. All teeth of each subject were polished and flossed by the examiner to eliminate dental plaque remnants. The importance of oral hygiene was strongly reinforced.
Thirty days after the initial phase, the volunteers were randomly assigned to 3 groups by random allocation using a computer-generated random table by a person not a participant in the study, and the experimental phase began. On day 0 of both experimental periods, PLI was recorded. During each 3-day experimental period, the participants were instructed to abstain from all forms of mechanical oral hygiene. A bottle containing 100 ml of mouth rinse was given to all students, and they were instructed to rinse 10 ml for 60 seconds, twice daily (in the morning and in the evening), and then expectorate it.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)Dose response
PhasePhase II
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution, 10% pomegranate solution
Primary outcome measurePlaque index (PLI) on the tooth surface was measured using a fuchsine-revealing solution and a periodontal probe after 3 days of product use
Secondary outcome measuresClinically significant adverse effects, including abscesses, mucosal ulcerations, or hypersensitivity reactions, were measured using data collected through clinical inspection and patient reports by the end of the study
Overall study start date27/09/2011
Completion date31/07/2016

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Healthy volunteer
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit19 Years
Upper age limit23 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants15
Total final enrolment15
Key inclusion criteria1. Dental students
2. At least 24 natural teeth
3. No signs of periodontitis
4. No caries or extensive dental restorations
5. No exposure to systemic antibiotic treatment during the past 6 months
5. Do not routinely use chemical plaque control
Key exclusion criteria1. An orthodontic appliance
2. Medical disorders
3. Smokers
4. Pregnant women
Date of first enrolment01/12/2015
Date of final enrolment15/12/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Brazil

Study participating centre

University of Fortaleza
Av. Washington Soares, 1321 - Edson Queiroz
Fortalez
60811905
Brazil

Sponsor information

Funders

Funder type

University/education

Universidade de Fortaleza
Government organisation / Universities (academic only)
Alternative name(s)
University of Fortaleza, UNIFOR
Location
Brazil

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date25/10/2025
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study will be available upon request from Sérgio Luís da Silva Pereira, luiss@unifor.br

Editorial Notes

24/09/2025: Study's existence confirmed by the University of Fortaleza-Unifor Center of Health Sciences-CCS, Brazil.