PACT (Patient Preferences in Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer Therapy): a randomised crossover clinical trial comparing bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin to capecitabine as treatment for moderate to high risk resected colorectal cancer

ISRCTN ISRCTN35708246
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN35708246
Secondary identifying numbers MO05/6844
Submission date
09/03/2005
Registration date
19/04/2005
Last edited
26/10/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

http://cancerhelp.cancerresearchuk.org/trials/a-trial-different-ways-having-chemotherapy-after-srugery-for-bowel-cancer-pact

Contact information

Prof Matthew Seymour
Scientific

Academic Unit of Oncology & Haematology
Dainton Building
Cookridge Hospital
Leeds
LS16 6QB
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised active controlled crossover group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titlePACT (Patient Preferences in Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer Therapy): a randomised crossover clinical trial comparing bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin to capecitabine as treatment for moderate to high risk resected colorectal cancer
Study acronymPACT
Study objectivesAdjuvant drug therapy reduces the risk of recurrence and death after resection of colorectal cancer, and is recommended routinely for all fit patients if at moderate-to-high risk of recurrence. Standard therapy is intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FU/LV). Large randomised controlled trials have already established that: a. 6 months' FU/LV is as effective as longer courses, and b. Once-weekly treatment is as effective as, but less toxic than, 5 consecutive days repeated monthly.

A recent trial (X-ACT) showed with high statistical confidence that oral capecitabine is as effective as intravenous FU/LV, so it presents an attractive alternative option. Capecitabine gave an acceptable toxicity profile in comparison with the FU/LV regimen used in that trial, although that was the 5-days monthly regimen which is known to be more toxic than weekly treatment.

Capecitabine is likely to become available for adjuvant use during 2005. Its equivalence of efficacy is not in doubt, but in order to advise patients we will require direct comparative data for the toxicity and acceptability to patients of capecitabine in comparison with the current commonly-used UK standard of weekly bolus FU/LV. The PACT trial will provide that comparison.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedColorectal cancer
InterventionA randomised crossover clinical trial comparing bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin to capecitabine
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, capecitabine
Primary outcome measurePatient preference for one of two regimens 12 weeks after randomisation, when the patient will have experienced both regimens
Secondary outcome measures1. Patient preference at 12 weeks, after experiencing both regimens, according to treatment sequence
2. Toxicity - maximum NCIC grade toxicity experienced within first cycle of regimen
3. Quality of Life (QoL) - assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 weeks post-randomisation. Assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30.
4. Dose intensity (DI) - delivered DI as a percentage of planned DI
5. Safety - comparison of rates of SAEs and SUSARS between the two regimens
Overall study start date01/04/2005
Completion date31/03/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants74
Key inclusion criteriaPatients aged 18 years or above with Dukes’ stage C or B colonic or rectal carcinoma, primary fully macroscopically resected (R0 or R1 resection), with no radiological or clinical evidence of metastatic disease (for Dukes’ B patients there must be a clinical indication for adjuvant chemotherapy, based on histological risk factors and patient factors) OR full resection of recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer, if the patient was not previously treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not meet inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment01/04/2005
Date of final enrolment31/03/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Academic Unit of Oncology & Haematology
Leeds
LS16 6QB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Leeds (UK)
Industry

Room 7.11, Level 7
Worsley Building
Clarendon Way
Leeds
LS2 9NL
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/024mrxd33

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Roche Products Ltd (UK) (Unconditional pharmaceutical study grant)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Plain English results No Yes
Results article results 10/07/2008 Yes No

Editorial Notes

26/10/2018: Cancer Research UK lay results summary link added to Results (plain English)