Knowledge translation for dementia: Comparing a blended learning approach with "classical" vocational training among general practitioners

ISRCTN ISRCTN36550981
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36550981
Secondary identifying numbers 01GK0512
Submission date
22/08/2006
Registration date
11/09/2006
Last edited
11/07/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Horst Christian Vollmar
Scientific

Witten/Herdecke University
Faculty of Medicine
Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50
Witten
58448
Germany

Study information

Study designOpen, cluster randomised controlled trial (randomisation on the level of general practitioners' quality circles)
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeOther
Scientific titleKnowledge translation for dementia: a cluster randomised trial to compare a blended learning approach with vocational training in quality circles of general practitioners
Study acronymWIDA (Wissensvermittlung Demenz in der Allgemeinmedizin)
Study objectivesOutcomes with respect to knowledge gain differ in Quality Circles (QC) with a blended learning approach versus QC with vocational training.

As of 28/07/09 this trial was updated to include a seperate public and scientific title.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics committee of Witten/Herdecke University (reference number: 42/2006), date of approval: 20/06/2006 (first amendment: 20/07/2006)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDementia
InterventionScientific researchers of Witten/Herdecke University offer a dementia education programme to moderators of QCs particular with GPs. Participating GPs in the intervention group were motivated to do some home study on the internet (t0). Online case-based learning and e-learning test modules for Continuing Medical Education (CME) in dementia were made available. At the next date of the QC the GPs received a structured discussion about the content of the dementia learning modules (t1). Between t0 and t1 the participants got a reminder.

The control group received usual vocational training followed by a structured discussion about dementia.

Both groups, the GPs in the intervention and in the control group, received written information on the "state-of-the-art" diagnosis and therapy of patients with dementia (short and comprehensive version of an evidence-based dementia guideline for GPs).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAt six weeks (+/- three weeks) (t1): knowledge gain measured by a multiple choice questionnaire with 20 questions about the diagnosis and therapy of dementia (difference from baseline at t0 to t1)
Secondary outcome measuresAt six weeks (+/- three weeks) (t1):
1. Evaluation of the education program by questionnaire
2. Questionnaire about utilisation and efficiency of educational media

At six months (+/- three weeks) (t2):
1. Knowledge about dementia (same questionnaire as at t0 and t1)
2. By 15% of participants: behaviour measured by four parameters (utilisation of psychometric tests, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) -codes for dementia, dementia drug prescribing, coordination of dementia care) extracted from the primary care computer systems
3. By 15% of participants: quality interviews focusing on strategies of lifelong learning as well as care of patients with dementia
Overall study start date01/07/2005
Completion date30/06/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants20 quality circles with 174 general practitioners (GPs)
Total final enrolment166
Key inclusion criteriaOn the level of quality circles (QC):
1. QC or ambulatory practice networks with an telephone agreement of the moderator and particular with General Practitioners (GPs)
2. GPs who participated in both sequential dates of the quality circles
3. GPs with internet access (home or practice)
Key exclusion criteriaParticipation in another QC which participates in the study
Date of first enrolment01/07/2005
Date of final enrolment30/06/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

Witten/Herdecke University
Witten
58448
Germany

Sponsor information

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) / German Aerospace Center (DLR) (Germany)
Government

BMBF Projektträger im DLR Gesundheitsforschung
Heinrich-Konen-Str. 1
Bonn
53227
Germany

Website http://www.pt-dlr.de
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04pz7b180

Funders

Funder type

Government

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)/German Aerospace Center (DLR) (ref. number: 01GK0512)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 22/06/2007 Yes No
Results article results 04/01/2010 11/07/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

11/07/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.