Analgesia During Arterial Puncture Trial in the Emergency Department: a comparison of lignocaine, cryogesic spray and nothing.

Prospectively registered

Protocol

Statistical analysis plan

Results

Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Dr F Beech
Scientific

Emergency Dept
North Bristol NHS Trust
Frenchay Hospital
Frenchay
Bristol
BS16 1ND
United Kingdom

Phone	+44 (0)117 970 1212

Primary study design	Interventional
Study design	Randomised controlled trial
Secondary study design	Randomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study acronym	ADAPTED
Study objectives	Does cryogesic spray provide adequate local anaesthesia for patients undergoing arterial puncture compared with lignocaine and our current practice of nothing.
Ethics approval(s)	Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied	Signs and Symptoms: Pain
Intervention	Lignocaine, cryogesic spray or nothing.
Intervention type	Drug
Phase	Not Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)	Lignocaine, cryogesic spray
Primary outcome measure(s)	Pain scores for arterial puncture with and without anaesthesia
Key secondary outcome measure(s)	Not provided at time of registration
Completion date	01/12/2003

Participant type(s)	Patient
Age group	Not Specified
Sex	Not Specified
Key inclusion criteria	Patients presenting to Emergency Department requiring arterial puncture.
Key exclusion criteria	Not provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment	01/06/2003
Date of final enrolment	01/12/2003

Emergency Dept

Bristol
BS16 1ND
United Kingdom

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share	No
IPD sharing plan summary	Not provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Output type	Details	Date created	Date added	Peer reviewed?	Patient-facing?
Results article	results	01/08/2008		Yes	No