Hyperbaric intra-thecal ropivacaine - a comparison with hyperbaric bupivacaine with respect to extent and duration of motor block

ISRCTN ISRCTN36749569
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36749569
Secondary identifying numbers N0504163841
Submission date
29/09/2006
Registration date
29/09/2006
Last edited
23/04/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr John Duggan
Scientific

Wansbeck General Hospital
Woodhorn Lane
Ashington
NE63 9JJ
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleHyperbaric intra-thecal ropivacaine - a comparison with hyperbaric bupivacaine with respect to extent and duration of motor block
Study objectives1. Does intra-thecal hyperbaric ropivacaine result in motor block of shorter duration when compared with an equal dose of bupivacaine (of equal baricity and concentration)?
2. Furthermore, does intra-thecal hyperbaric ropivacaine produce a sensory block of similar extent and duration to an equal dose of intra-thecal bupivacaine of equal baricity and concentration?
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: Anaesthesia
Intervention40 patients undergoing spinal anaethesia would be recruited to our study and randomised to receive equal hyperbaric doses of either 0.5% bupivacaine in 8% glucose solution or 0.5% ropivacaine in 8% glucose solution. The solutions would be of similar anaesthesia under standardised conditions, we would measure a number of parameters of particular interest. After surgery, we would study the recovery profile of all recruited subjects for the duration of time taken to achieve complete neurological recovery. We would record strength of dorsi-flexion in 15 minute intervals and time to regression of sensory block.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Ropivacaine, bupivacaine
Primary outcome measureNot provided at time of registration
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/05/2005
Completion date01/05/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants40
Key inclusion criteria1. Elective surgery
2. Patient and surgery appropriate for spinal anaesthesia
3. ASA grade <3
4. Age >18 years
5. Non-pregnant
6. No known sensitivities to amide class of local anaesthetics
7. Not currently or recently (<3 months) recruited to other clinical trials
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment01/05/2005
Date of final enrolment01/05/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Wansbeck General Hospital
Ashington
NE63 9JJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Government

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan