Acceptance and cost effectiveness of insecticide treated curtains in areas with low Aedes infestation levels

ISRCTN ISRCTN37433764
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN37433764
Secondary identifying numbers EC UZA 8/36/196
Submission date
08/03/2011
Registration date
04/05/2011
Last edited
21/01/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Patrick Van der Stuyft
Scientific

Nationale Straat 155
Antwerp
2000
Belgium

Study information

Study designSingle-centre cluster randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designCluster randomised trial
Study setting(s)Community
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleAcceptance and cost effectiveness of insecticide treated curtains in areas with low Aedes infestation levels: a single-centre, cluster, randomised controlled trial
Study objectivesAcceptance, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a dengue control intervention implementing insecticide treated curtains, as a single Aedes control strategy will be different than when implementation of curtains is combined with community based environmental management.
Ethics approval(s)Ethical committee of University Hospital Antwerp, 15/09/2008
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedEffect of intervention on Aedes aegypti infestation levels (vector of dengue fever)
Intervention1. Insecticide treated curtains: made from long-lasting, insecticide treated (pyrethroid deltamethrin is applied during manufacture) polyester netting that requires no re-impregnation, materials are special ultraviolet (UV) protected and retain their insecticidal properties and efficacy for about 2 years (information from producer).
2. The material has been approved by World Health Organisation Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES) for use as bednets.
3. Community based environmental management approach: dengue control activities were identified, designed, planned and executed by the community itself, with the support of newly set up local 'community working groups'
4. Control: routine aedes control programme (entomological surveillance, source reduction, selective adulticiding and health education)
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Aedes infestation levels are the primary outcomes
1.1. House Indices (HI) - number of houses positive for at least one container with Aedes aegypti immature stages/100 inspected houses
1.2. Breteau Indices (BI) number of containers positive for Aedes. aegypti immature stages/100 inspected houses
1.3. Pupal Indices (PI) number of Aedes. aegypti pupae/inhabitant
2. In cycles of 11 days, the National Vector Control programme conduct routine entomological surveys in all dwellings of the municipality. This will provide the entomological information for all clusters for the period of study.
Secondary outcome measures1. Uptake, use and acceptance of Insecticide treated curtains
2. Financial cost of the two interventions in comparison to the control
3. The percentage of blocks repeatedly positive for larvae
4. Level of community participation based on Rifkin criteria
Overall study start date30/09/2008
Completion date01/04/2012

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participants12 circumscriptions of 500 households
Key inclusion criteria1. No patients, but communities were included
2. Circumscriptions (neighboorhoods) of urban Guantanamo after obtaining community approval
Key exclusion criteriaCircumscriptions without community approval
Date of first enrolment30/09/2008
Date of final enrolment01/04/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Belgium
  • Cuba

Study participating centre

Nationale Straat 155
Antwerp
2000
Belgium

Sponsor information

Institute of Tropical Medicine (Belgium)
Government

Epidemiology and Disease Control Unit
Public Health Department
Nationale Straat 155
Antwerp
2000
Belgium

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03xq4x896

Funders

Funder type

Government

Directorate General for Development Cooperation (DGDC) (Belgium) (project ref: 95900) (framework agreement between the Institute of Tropical Medicine of Belgium and of Cuba)

No information available

Ministry of Health (MINSAP) (Cuba)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available upon request from Toledo Maria Eugenia (mariaeugenia@ipk.sld.cu), Institute of Tropical Medicine “Pedro Kourí”, Habana, Cuba. Data sharing may be conditional on approval of the purported use by the Cuban Ministry of Health.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 20/03/2015 17/01/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

21/01/2019: IPD sharing statement.
17/01/2019: Publication reference added.