Is the Short-stretch bandage or the 4-layer bandage more effective in treating leg ulcers?

ISRCTN ISRCTN37782978
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN37782978
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00202267
Secondary identifying numbers MCT-63175
Submission date
01/03/2006
Registration date
01/03/2006
Last edited
22/05/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Margaret B. Harrison
Scientific

Professor, School of Nursing
Director, Joanna Briggs Collaboration
Senior Scientist, Practice and Research in Nursing Group
Queen's University
90 Barrie Street
Kingston
K7L 3N6
Canada

Phone +1 613 533 6000 ext 74760
Email Margaret.B.Harrison@queensu.ca

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleCommunity randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of two compression bandaging technologies
Study acronymCBT (Canadian Bandaging Trial)
Study objectivesTo determine whether there is a 4 weeks or greater improvement in time-to-healing with short-stretch bandages compared to the four-layer bandaging system; the time to complete healing of the reference ulcer (one year randomisation, follow-up to 30 months).

As of 08/05/2009 this record was updated to include changes to the protocol. All changes can be found under the relevant field. At this time the anticipated end date of this trial was also updated; the initial end date at the time of registration was 30/09/2007.
Ethics approval(s)Research Ethics Board of Queen's University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals, Kingston, Ontario (Canada) approved on the 8th July 2003. Renewed annually.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedVenous ulcer (leg)
InterventionFour-layer bandage versus short-stretch bandage for four weeks with a follow-up until 12 months after healing in some cases until a maximum of 30 months

Trial details received: 12 Sept 2005.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTime-to-healing of the reference ulcer (comparison of four-layer and short-stretch over 4 week period)
Secondary outcome measuresCurrent information as of 08/05/2009:
Over a one-year follow-up:
1. Rate of reduction in ulcer area for a maximum of 30 months
2. Proportion of ulcers healed at 12 and 24 weeks in each arm
2. Durability of Healing: Recurrence rates during 12 months after healing
3. Quality of life (McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire; SF-12; EuroQol on five dimensions-Mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety depression) at 12 months after healing
4. Expenditures for treatment

Initial information at time of registration
Over a one-year follow-up:
1. Rate of reduction in ulcer area for a maximum of 30 months
2. Recurrence rates during 12 months after healing
3. Quality of life (McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire; SF-12; self-administered survey) at 12 months after healing
4. Expenditures for treatment
Overall study start date11/01/2003
Completion date31/12/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsAdded as of 08/05/2009: 424 (previously 414)
Key inclusion criteriaCurrent information as of 08/05/2009:
1. 18 years or older, either sex, ability to communicate in English
2. Could provide written informed consent
3. Had an ulcer of a minimum duration of 1 week
4. Had a clinical presentation of venous insufficiency
5. Had a leg ulcer that measured 0.7 cm in any one dimension
6. Ankle brachial pressure index greater than or equal to 0.8

Initial information at time of registration
1. 18 years or older, either sex, ability to communicate in English
2. Leg ulcer greater than 1 cm in any one dimension, minimum duration of 1 week, Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) greater than 0.7
Key exclusion criteriaCurrent information as of 08/05/2009:
1. Had diabetes (taking insulin or an oral hypoglycaemic)
2. Had failed to improve over a 3-month period after being treated with either bandaging systems prior to the trial
3. Had been a previous study patient
4. Were cognitively impaired

Initial information at time of registration
1. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
2. Participants who failed to improve over a 3-month period after being treated previously with either of the trial treatments
3. Previous trial patients
4. Cognitive impairment
Date of first enrolment11/01/2003
Date of final enrolment31/12/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Canada

Study participating centre

Professor, School of Nursing
Kingston
K7L 3N6
Canada

Sponsor information

Queen's University (Canada)
University/education

207 Stuart St
Kingston
K7L 3N6
Canada

Website http://www.queensu.ca/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02y72wh86

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Canada) - http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca (ref: MCT-63175)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 02/10/2012 Yes No