A prospective randomised study comparing lateral internal sphincterotomy with anal dilatation in the treatment of anal fissures.

ISRCTN ISRCTN40397527
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40397527
Protocol serial number N0084144571
Sponsor Department of Health
Funder Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Trust (UK), NHS R&D Support Funding
Submission date
30/09/2005
Registration date
30/09/2005
Last edited
25/11/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Muzaffar Ahmad
Scientific

Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Cliff Gardens
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designProspective randomised study
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesAre Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS) and Anal Dilatation for the treatment of anal fissures both acceptable procedures giving equal results?
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: Anal fissure
InterventionPatients diagnosed as having anal fissure who have been advised to have surgery for the same, and who have agreed to such advice and fulfil the inclusion criteria will be invited to take part in the study until sample size is achieved.

Lateral internal sphincterotomy vs anal dilatation
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)1. The patient will be required to record all intake of Tramadol on the data collection sheet. The usage of as required medication would be used to calculate the difference in analgesic requirement between the two groups.
2. Anal incontinence will be assessed by the New St. Marks Score, extent of healing will be scored on a scale from 1 to 3, 1=no healing, 3=complete healing.
3. Pain scores on a numerical rating scale 0-10 will be collected from the patient as notes on day 1, day 5 and day 10.
Key secondary outcome measure(s)Not provided at time of registration
Completion date30/06/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration60
Key inclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment02/06/2003
Date of final enrolment30/06/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan