A prospective randomised study comparing lateral internal sphincterotomy with anal dilatation in the treatment of anal fissures.
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN40397527 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40397527 |
| Protocol serial number | N0084144571 |
| Sponsor | Department of Health |
| Funder | Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Trust (UK), NHS R&D Support Funding |
- Submission date
- 30/09/2005
- Registration date
- 30/09/2005
- Last edited
- 25/11/2013
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mr Muzaffar Ahmad
Scientific
Scientific
Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Cliff Gardens
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Prospective randomised study |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | |
| Study objectives | Are Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS) and Anal Dilatation for the treatment of anal fissures both acceptable procedures giving equal results? |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Surgery: Anal fissure |
| Intervention | Patients diagnosed as having anal fissure who have been advised to have surgery for the same, and who have agreed to such advice and fulfil the inclusion criteria will be invited to take part in the study until sample size is achieved. Lateral internal sphincterotomy vs anal dilatation |
| Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
| Primary outcome measure(s) | 1. The patient will be required to record all intake of Tramadol on the data collection sheet. The usage of as required medication would be used to calculate the difference in analgesic requirement between the two groups. 2. Anal incontinence will be assessed by the New St. Marks Score, extent of healing will be scored on a scale from 1 to 3, 1=no healing, 3=complete healing. 3. Pain scores on a numerical rating scale 0-10 will be collected from the patient as notes on day 1, day 5 and day 10. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Completion date | 30/06/2004 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | Not Specified |
| Target sample size at registration | 60 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Key exclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Date of first enrolment | 02/06/2003 |
| Date of final enrolment | 30/06/2004 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |