Effects of external-focus feedback on motor skill acquisition after stroke
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN40620137 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40620137 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | 4425 |
- Submission date
- 21/10/2010
- Registration date
- 21/10/2010
- Last edited
- 24/09/2013
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Paulette van Vliet
Scientific
Scientific
University of Birmingham
School of Health Sciences
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom
| p.vanvliet@bham.ac.uk |
Study information
| Study design | Multicentre non-randomised interventional phase II treatment trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Non randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Scientific title | |
| Study acronym | Motor skill acquisition |
| Study objectives | In healthy subjects, feedback inducing an external focus of attention (about movement effects) produces more effective movements compared with feedback that induces an internal focus of attention (about body movements). It is unclear whether this extends to people with stroke. Objective: To examine whether feedback inducing an internal or external focus was more effective for retraining the hemiplegic arm. |
| Ethics approval(s) | MREC approved (ref: 05/Q2709/126) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Topic: Stroke Research Network; Subtopic: Rehabilitation; Disease: Therapy type |
| Intervention | Forty-two people with stroke performed three reaching tasks in a counterbalanced, within-subject design. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | Faster movements |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. Increased percentage time to peak deceleration 2. Increased percentage time to peak velocity |
| Overall study start date | 10/07/2007 |
| Completion date | 25/06/2008 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | Not Specified |
| Target number of participants | Planned sample size: 42; UK sample size: 42 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Diagnosis of stroke of ischaemic or haemorrhagic origin 2. Score of between 25 and 60 on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (arm section) 3. Informed written consent |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Upper limb movement deficits attributable to non-stroke pathology 2. Severe somato-sensory disturbance (less than 1 on the Erasmus MC Modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment) 3. More than 18 months post-stroke 4. Moderate to severe receptive aphasia (less than 5 on 'receptive skills' of Sheffield Test for Acquired Language Disorders) |
| Date of first enrolment | 10/07/2007 |
| Date of final enrolment | 25/06/2008 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
University of Birmingham
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom
B15 2TT
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University of Birmingham (UK)
University/education
University/education
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
England
United Kingdom
| Website | http://www.bham.ac.uk |
|---|---|
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/03angcq70 |
Funders
Funder type
Charity
The Stroke Association (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/06/2014 | Yes | No |
