Comparison of effects of combined angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and low dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in patients with hypertension and type two diabetes: a double-blind crossover study

ISRCTN ISRCTN41655008
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN41655008
Protocol serial number 203/01
Sponsor Royal Victoria Hospital (UK)
Funders Metabolic Research fund - Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, N.Ireland (UK), Royal Fellowship - Royal Victoria Hospital (UK)
Submission date
19/12/2006
Registration date
06/02/2007
Last edited
03/05/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Patrick Bell
Scientific

Regional Centre for Endocrinology
Level One
Royal Victoria Hospital
Belfast
BT12 6BA
United Kingdom

Email patrick.bell@royalhospitals.n-i.nhs.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised double-blind crossover study
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesNew blood pressure targets have resulted in increased use of antihypertensive drugs including combinations. This study aimed to establish the safety in terms of insulin sensitivity of a low dose thiazide (bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg)/Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitor combination.
Ethics approval(s)Research Ethics Committee, Royal Victoria Hospital on behalf of Queens University Belfast on 22/082001(ref: 203/01)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedType two diabetes and essential hypertension
InterventionPatients were commenced on captopril 50 mg twice daily and this continued throughout the trial. Patients were randomly assigned to either bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg once daily or placebo for twelve weeks before being crossed over to receive the alternate randomly allocated bendroflumethiazide or placebo. Insulin action was assessed at the end of the placebo run-in and at the end of the two treatment periods using an isoglycaemic hyperinsulinameic clamp technique.
Intervention typeDrug
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Captopril and bendroflumethiazide
Primary outcome measure(s)

When compared to captopril alone, treatment with low dose bendroflumethiaizide (1.25 mg) in combination with captopril produced a 23% reduction in glucose infusion rates required to maintain isoglycaemia and there was a comparable reduction in isotopically induced decline in peripheral insulin sensitivity most probably in skeletal muscle. The combination of low-dose bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg and captopril resulted in a significant reduction in blood pressure (6/3 mmHg) compared to captopril alone.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Serum potassium was significantly lower after treatment with captopril and bendroflumethiaizide as compared to treatment with captopril alone.

Completion date01/04/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration15
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 40 to 65 years
2. Hypertension (either newly diagnosed or controlled on treatment)
3. Type two diabetes established on dietary treatment with or without oral hypoglycaemic agents
4. Fasting plasma glucose in the range 7 - 12 mmol/l
Key exclusion criteria1. Secondary hypertension
2. Hepatic or renal disease or were taking Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) or steroids which may affect insulin action
Date of first enrolment01/08/2001
Date of final enrolment01/04/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • Northern Ireland

Study participating centre

Regional Centre for Endocrinology
Belfast
BT12 6BA
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/05/2008 Yes No