Chondroitin sulphate for hand osteoarthritis: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in primary care

ISRCTN ISRCTN44644781
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44644781
EudraCT/CTIS number 2016-004670-18
Secondary identifying numbers RG-0004-16-IPCHS; HTA 14/45/04
Submission date
17/11/2016
Registration date
18/11/2016
Last edited
01/11/2017
Recruitment status
Stopped
Overall study status
Stopped
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a condition that causes joints to become painful and stiff. Painful hand OA affects 13-26% of adults aged 50 and over in the UK. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recently reviewed the costs and benefits of chondroitin sulphate in OA and decided against recommending it for use in the NHS on current evidence but highlighting the need for further research. One study found that chondroitin sulphate was better than a placebo (dummy drug) and had few side effects but the improvements in patients’ pain and function after 6 months were generally small. However, this was a relatively small and short study, involving patients with more severe, advanced hand OA. Given the limited options for treatment of OA of the small joints of the hand, further research is now needed to determine whether chondroitin sulphate has long-term benefits on hand OA. To answer this question a longer term assessment of chondroitin sulphate is needed. The aim of this study is to find out whether chondroitin sulphate can improve hand pain and function over 12 months for people with hand OA.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 50 and over with hand OA

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups.
Participants in one group take chondroitin sulphate capsules daily for 2 years and also receive usual care. Participants in the other group take matching placebo (dummy) capsules daily for 2 years and also receive usual care. Any benefits of chondroitin sulphate may take weeks or months to emerge and so information is gathered from participants via postal questionnaires and telephone calls from a research nurse on seven occasions over a 2-year period. The calls are also an opportunity to check on how participants are getting on with their treatment and to support their involvement in the study. The focus is on the severity of hand pain over the first year, but changes in difficulties with daily activities due to the hand problem, possible side effects, other treatments, and general health are also assessed. Participants are invited to attend assessment clinics at the start of the study and at 1 and 2 years to test their hand strength. Hand x-rays are taken at the start of the study and after two years to find out whether chondroitin sulphate slows down the disease process.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Although no direct benefit can be guaranteed, all participants will receive advice and information on better managing their hand problem. The results of this study will improve the treatment of hand OA in the future. All questions, examinations and x-rays in this study are already used to assess hand pain and hand problems, and any discomfort after a hand examination should be short-lasting. Radiation doses from x-ray examinations are extremely small in relation to those received from everyday living and therefore are not associated with any significant health risk. All medications can potentially cause side effects. Chondroitin sulphate has been used as a prescription medicine for the treatment of osteoarthritis symptoms for a number of years in several European countries but is not currently licensed in the UK. The most common side effects of chondroitin sulphate are gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhoea or constipation), although these are rare (experienced by less than 1 in 1,000 people). Other possible side effects are oedema (water retention) or an allergic reaction, but these are extremely rare (experienced by less than 1 in 10,000 people).

Where is the study run from?
Keele Clinical Trials Unit (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2015 to April 2020

Who is funding the study?
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Mrs Kendra Cooke

Study website

Contact information

Mrs Kendra Cooke
Public

Keele Clinical Trials Unit (CTU)
David Weatherall Building
Keele University
Staffordshire
ST5 5BG
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designSingle-centre, investigator-, practitioner- and participant-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised superiority trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Downloadable from www.keele.ac.uk/factual
Scientific titleFinger osteoArthritis Chondroitin Treatment Used in addition to Advice and Leaflets
Study acronymFACTUAL
Study hypothesisThis trial is to find out whether 1200mg daily highly purified oral chondroitin sulphate, plus usual care, is effective, in terms of pain, function, structural disease progression, and cost-effective in patients with hand OA when compared to a placebo, plus usual care.

A 24-month Phase IV single-centre primary care, investigator-, practitioner- and participant-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised, superiority trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 1200mg daily highly purified oral chondroitin sulphate plus usual care for painful hand osteoarthritis in adults aged 50 years and over with a linked qualitative study

More details can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/144504
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
ConditionOsteoarthritis of the hand
InterventionParticipants are randomised to one of two treatment groups via a web-based database:
1. Highly purified chondroitin sulphate 1200mg (3 x 400mg capsules) daily, oral, taken once per day for 2 years; plus usual care
2. Matching placebo 1200mg (3 x 400mg capsules) daily, oral, taken once per day for 2 years; plus usual care

Any benefits of chondroitin sulphate may take weeks or months to emerge and so information is gathered from participants via postal questionnaires and telephone calls from a research nurse on seven occasions over a 2-year period. The calls are also an opportunity to check on how participants are getting on with their treatment and to support their involvement in the study. The focus is on the severity of hand pain over the first year, but changes in difficulties with daily activities due to the hand problem, possible side effects, other treatments, and general health are also assessed. Participants are invited to attend assessment clinics at the start of the study and at 1 and 2 years to test their hand strength. Hand x-rays are taken at the start of the study and after two years to find out whether chondroitin sulphate slows down the disease process.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase IV
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Highly purified chondroitin sulphate
Primary outcome measurePain severity in the previous 2 weeks, measured using a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary outcome measures1. Secondary clinical effectiveness outcomes:
1.1. Severity and frequency of patient-reported hand pain and other hand symptoms, measured using AUSCAN, ACR criteria at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months
1.2. Patient-reported hand function, measured using FIHOA and AUSCAN at 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
1.3. Patient global rating of change in hand problem and other composite outcomes, measured using global improvement measure, OMERACT-OARSI at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
1.4. Performance-based measures of hand function, measured using GAT and grip/pinch strength measures at 0, 12 and 24 months
1.5. Pain at other joint sites, measured using 0-10 NRS at 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
1.6. Patient-reported general health, measured using SF-12 v2 at 0, 12 and 24 months
1.7. Patient-reported mood, measured using HADS at 0, 12 and 24 months
1.8. (Serious) adverse events, measured at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
2. Cost-effectiveness, measured using EuroQoL 5D-5L, self-report cost data at 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
3. Structural disease progression of hand OA, measured using summed score for finger joints (DIP, PIP, thumb IP) Kallman (0-180), summed score for finger and thumb joints (DIP, PIP, thumb IP, CMC, TS across both hands) (0-208), summed score for base of thumb joints (CMC, TS) (0-28), mean score per feature, mean score per joint group per feature, bilateral hand radiographs, at 0 and 24 months
Overall study start date01/12/2015
Overall study end date30/04/2020
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)Lack of funding/sponsorship

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants380
Participant inclusion criteria1. Aged 50 years and over
2. Fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition of symptomatic hand OA
3. Hand pain ≥4/10 NRS in at least one hand
4. Hand pain is present on some, most or all days in the past month
5. Able to have bilateral hand radiographs
6. Stable medicines/treatment regime for pain
7. Ability to understand and capable of giving written informed consent
Participant exclusion criteria1. Red flags e.g. history of serious illness or disease (e.g. stroke), progressive neurological signs, acute swollen joint; fractures or significant injury or surgery to the wrist or hand in the last 3 months
2. Inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis)
3. Previous use of chondroitin sulphate – ever*/within last 3 months (*subject to internal pilot)
4. Recent (past 3 months) use of steroids (oral, intra-muscular or intra-articular)
5. Recent (past 3 months) use of glucosamine sulphate/hydrochloride
6. Recent (past 3 months) plain x-rays of the hand(s)
7. Contra-indications to the trial medication (significant hypersensitivity to the active ingredient or to any of the excipients; pregnancy or breastfeeding)
8. Isolated thumb base (carpometacarpal joint) OA
9. Severe comorbidities (severe liver disease, uncontrolled asthma, severe renal disease, congestive cardiac failure, malignancy, known clotting disorders, anticoagulants)
10. Vulnerable individuals (e.g. psychiatric illness, learning difficulties, dementia, terminal illness and severe enduring mental ill health)
11. Known diagnosis of HIV or hepatitis
Recruitment start date01/07/2017
Recruitment end date30/06/2018

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Keele Clinical Trials Unit
Keele University
Staffordshire
Keele
ST5 5BG
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Keele University
University/education

Directorate of Engagement & Partnerships
Innovation Centre 2
Keele University Science & Innovation Park
Staffordshire
ST5 5NH
England
United Kingdom

Website www.keele.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00340yn33

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination plan02/10/2017:
No publication plans
No IPD sharing statement

Prior to 02/10/2017:
Research results will be published in scientific journals and the relevant manuscripts made available in the public domain as required by the funder (NIHR HTA). Information will also be provided for appropriate public forums. Once the results of the trial have been published (Nov 2020), participants will be sent a summary of the main trial findings.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Christian Mallen.

Editorial Notes

01/11/2017: Internal review.
02/10/2017: Study stopped. Funding was withdrawn before commencement of patient recruitment. Failure to reach agreement on data sharing.