A new treatment protocol reducing the risk of implantation failure and early pregnancy loss after transfer of embryos resulting from in vitro fertilisation

ISRCTN ISRCTN45835041
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN45835041
Secondary identifying numbers 1976
Submission date
06/06/2018
Registration date
05/07/2018
Last edited
04/07/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
In some cases of infertility, fertilisation and the early post-fertilisation development occur normally, but the resulting embryos fail to implant in the uterus (womb). This problem can be caused by insufficient production of the hormone called progesterone by the ovary. This abnormality is often associated with hormonal treatment protocols used for in vitro fertilisation (IVF). To solve this problem, women treated by IVF are usually given extra progesterone after the embryo is transferred to the uterus. Recent data have shown that, in addition to progesterone administration, the production of progesterone by the patient’s own ovary can be stimulated by treating the patients with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a GnRH agonist on IVF outcomes and blood progesterone levels in a group of women with a previous failure of the technique, associated with low blood progesterone levels.

Who can participate?
Women between 25 and 40 years of age with a previous IVF failure associated with low blood progesterone levels after embryo transfer

What does the study involve?
The study compares outcomes of two consecutive attempts of IVF in the same patients. Unlike the first attempt, in the second attempt the patients are treated with a GnRH agonist during 2 weeks after embryo transfer to the uterus. Except for this difference, the patients receive the same treatment in both attempts. Clinical pregnancy rate (number of pregnancies divided by the number of embryo transfer procedures) is measured from medical records at 3 months after embryo transfer.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Patients may have better IVF outcomes in the second attempt, without any additional side effects.

Where is the study run from?
MARGen Clinic (Spain)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2016 to April 2018

Who is funding the study?
MARGen Clinic (Spain)

Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Raquel Mendoza-Tesarik
mendozatesarik@gmail.com
2. Dr Jan Tesarik
jtesarik@clinicamargen.com

Contact information

Dr Jan Tesarik
Scientific

MARGen Clinic
Camino de Ronda 2
Granada
18006
Spain

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-4645-5804
Phone +346 (0)637 6992
Email jtesarik@clinicamargen.com

Study information

Study designObservational case-control study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCase-control study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleEfficient treatment of luteal phase deficiency in HCG-triggered IVF cycles by prolonged administration of GnRH agonist after embryo transfer
Study objectivesThis study aimed to identify women with IVF failure associated with low serum progesterone levels on the days following embryo transfer and to evaluate the effects of GnRH agonist on serum progesterone and pregnancy in GnRH antagonist-controlled and HCG-triggered IVF cycles.
Ethics approval(s)Not applicable
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLuteal phase insufficiency in assisted reproduction
InterventionIn women who failed to get pregnant and had an abnormally low serum progesterone concentration after uterine transfer of embryos resulting from in vitro fertilisation, the protocol of the subsequent attempt was modified as follows. First, the treatment phase before embryo transfer, including ovarian stimulation, ovarian follicle puncture and oocyte recovery, in vitro fertilisation, and embryo in vitro culture and uterine transfer, were performed exactly as in the previous attempt. The only difference concerned the period after embryo transfer. In addition to direct progesterone administration, the patients were given daily subcutaneous injections of GnRH agonist (0.1 mg triptorelin) during 14 days following embryo transfer.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Triptorelin
Primary outcome measureClinical pregnancy rate (number of pregnancies divided by the number of embryo transfer procedures) is measured from medical records 3 months after embryo transfer
Secondary outcome measures1. Implantation rate (number of gestational sacs containing a living embryo implanted in the uterus divided by the number of embryos transferred) is measured from medical records 6 weeks after embryo transfer
2. Serum progesterone concentration is measured using immunoassay at the 7th and 14th day after embryo transfer
3. Total dose of progesterone administered is measured from medical records at the 14th day after embryo transfer
Overall study start date01/09/2016
Completion date30/04/2018

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants25
Key inclusion criteria1. Women
2. Aged between 28 and 39 years,
3. Failed to become pregnant
4. Had low luteal-phase progesterone levels in a previous in vitro fertilization attempt
Key exclusion criteria1. Age of >40 years
2. Andrological gynecological and systemic pathologies unrelated to the corpus luteum function:
2.1. Azoospermia
2.2. Necrozoospermia
2.3. Uterine polyps and fibroids
2.4. Polycystic ovary syndrome
2.5. Endometriosis
2.6. Cushing syndrome
2.7. Diabetes
2.8. Hypothyreosis and hyperthyreosis
2.9. Body mass index >29
Date of first enrolment01/09/2016
Date of final enrolment31/12/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Spain

Study participating centre

MARGen Clinic
Camino de Ronda 2
Granada
18006
Spain

Sponsor information

MARGen Clinic
Hospital/treatment centre

Camino de Ronda 2
Granada
18006
Spain

Phone +34 (0)6063 76992
Email jtesarik@clinicamargen.com
Website www.clinicamargen.com

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

MARGen Clinic

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/12/2018
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planStudy results will be submitted to a specialized scientific journal during 2018.
IPD sharing planThe data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.