A randomised controlled trial of Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5 Fluorourcil (5-FU) versus Interferon-alpha alone in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

ISRCTN ISRCTN46518965
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN46518965
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00053820
Secondary identifying numbers RE04 (E164/5)
Submission date
08/11/2000
Registration date
08/11/2000
Last edited
18/10/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

http://www.ctu.mrc.ac.uk/research_areas/study_details.aspx?s=61

Contact information

Prof Martin Gore
Scientific

Royal Marsden Hospital
Fulham Road
London
SW3 6JJ
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleA randomised controlled trial of Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5 Fluorourcil (5-FU) versus Interferon-alpha alone in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma
Study hypothesis1. The value of triple combination therapy in terms of overall survival in patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared with IFN-alpha alone
2. The value of triple combination therapy in terms of progression-free survival time and toxicity compared with IFN-alpha alone
3. The Quality of Life of patients in both treatment arms during therapy and
follow-up
4. The health economic implications of using triple therapy compared to the control regimen
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration.
ConditionRenal Cancer
InterventionArm 1: IFN-alpha until progression
Arm 2: IFN-alpha, IL-2 and 5-FU (max 2 cycles)
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5 Fluorourcil (5-FU)
Primary outcome measureThe primary endpoint is survival. The primary endpoint, which will be used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment regimens, will be time to death. All deaths should be reported immediately and time to death will be calculated from the date of randomisation.
Secondary outcome measures1. Time to disease progression. Progression is defined according to the RECIST guidelines
2. Comparison of toxicity levels, principally grade III/IV
3. Quality of life will be assessed before, during and after treatment
4. The impact of the treatment regimens on health economics will also be evaluated
Overall study start date24/04/2001
Overall study end date31/07/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants1100
Participant inclusion criteria1. Histologically proven renal cell carcinoma. Material may be obtained from the primary tumour or the metastases
2. Advanced metastatic disease – that, in the opinion of the investigator, requires treatment. (We would recommend that patients have undergone resection of their primary tumour prior to entry into the trial but this is not mandatory)
3. At least one measurable lesion. Measurements must be taken within the 4 week period before the start of treatment (single bone lesions should not be included due to assessing response)
4. WHO performance status 0 or 1
5. Normal haematological parameters (WBC >3 x 109/l; platelets >100 x 109/l; haemoglobin >10g/dl). This assessment should be carried out within 7 days before randomisation
6. Creatinine levels must be within normal limits for institution. If creatinine raised, then EDTA or creatinine clearance should be greater than 60ml/min
7. Life expectancy greater than 12 weeks
8. Written informed consent
9. Male or female patient of any ethnic group more than 18 years in age
Participant exclusion criteria1. No radiotherapy to target lesions during trial therapy
2. Previous chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or treatment with biological agents
3. No current or previous brain metastasis
4. Unstable angina pectoris or recent (6 month) myocardial infarction
5. Evidence of active infections requiring antibiotic therapy
6. Patients with major organ allografts (IL-2 may increase T-cell mediated rejection and immunosuppressive agents are likely to reduce efficacy of IL-2 and IFN-alpha
7. Patients who require or are likely to require corticosteroids for intercurrent disease
8. Pregnant or lactating women
9. Other disease or previous malignancy likely to interfere with the protocol treatments or comparisons
10. Patients with concurrent malignancy, unless they have remained free of the disease attributed to the malignancy for more than 5 years
Recruitment start date24/04/2001
Recruitment end date31/07/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • England
  • Germany
  • Netherlands
  • Slovakia
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Royal Marsden Hospital
London
SW3 6JJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)
Research council

20 Park Crescent
London
W1B 1AL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7636 5422
Email clinical.trial@headoffice.mrc.ac.uk
Website http://www.mrc.ac.uk

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK)
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), UK Medical Research Council, MRC
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Plain English results No Yes
Other publications rationale and progress 01/08/2005 Yes No
Results article results 20/02/2010 Yes No

Editorial Notes

18/10/2018: Cancer Research UK lay results summary link added to Results (plain English)