A randomised controlled trial of racemic epinephrine versus salbutamol for treatment of respiratory distress in bronchiolitis

ISRCTN ISRCTN46561076
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN46561076
Protocol serial number N/A
Sponsor Lung Association of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Funders Lung Association of Nova Scotia (Canada), IWK Health Center Research Office (Canada)
Submission date
19/04/2005
Registration date
20/04/2005
Last edited
15/02/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Joanne Langley
Scientific

5850 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3K 6R8
Canada

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesAerosolised racemic epinephrine given to hospitalised children under two years of age with bronchiolitis is more effective than aerosolised salbutomol in relieving respiratory distress.
Ethics approval(s)The protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Board at both participating institutions.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedBronchiolitis
InterventionRacemic epinephrine or salbutamol.
Intervention typeDrug
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Racemic epinephrine
Primary outcome measure(s)

Wheezing and retractions measured by the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument each day during hospitalisation.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Length of stay
2. RSV antigen detection test
3. Feeding pattern
4. Adverse events
5. Parental report of feeding and respiratory status one week after discharge

Completion date31/12/2002

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Upper age limit2 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration62
Key inclusion criteriaChildren less than two years of age with first episode wheezing.
Key exclusion criteriaChildren were not eligible for enrollment if they:
1. Had a previous diagnosis of asthma
2. Were critically ill
3. Had chronic pulmonary or cardiac disease

Other exclusion criteria included:
4. Allergy to sodium metabisulfite
5. Presence of tachycardia exceeding 200 beats per minute
6. Use of glucocorticoids
7. Sympathomimetic amines or monoamine oxidase inhibitor therapy
Date of first enrolment01/01/1999
Date of final enrolment31/12/2002

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Canada

Study participating centre

5850 University Avenue
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3K 6R8
Canada

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results 05/05/2005 Yes No