A study to improve the outcomes of mothers and babies through safe and appropriate caesarean sections
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN47224807 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN47224807 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) | Nil known |
| Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) | Nil known |
| Protocol serial number | MR/V035282/1 |
| Sponsor | University of Liverpool |
| Funder | Medical Research Council |
- Submission date
- 07/11/2023
- Registration date
- 05/02/2024
- Last edited
- 25/06/2025
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Pregnancy and Childbirth
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Caesarean section is considered a life-saving procedure for pregnant women and their babies. Yet, in low- and middle-income countries, mothers who give birth by caesarean section are 100 times more likely to die than those having the procedure in high-income countries. In these settings, caesarean sections also contribute to life-long health problems that affect the women's quality of life and their ability to safely have more children. Their babies are also at high risk of dying during or soon after caesarean section.
The three main reasons for poor outcomes after caesarean section in low- and middle-income countries are:
1. Inappropriate caesarean sections (e.g. performed 'too many, too soon' or 'too little, too late')
2. Unsafe practices in performing the procedure
3. Substandard care in labour (e.g. not culminating in vaginal birth which leads to complicated caesarean sections in advanced labour).
Many issues contribute to the above problems such as lack of knowledge and skills to undertake safe caesarean section (and to achieve safe vaginal births - both normal and by using instruments). In addition, attitudes towards caesarean section and the use of vacuum or forceps, marginalisation of midwives, dysfunctional teamwork, a culture of blame and medico-legal concerns, influence of family members and communities in decision-making, poor communication skills between women and healthcare providers and amongst clinicians, and inability to determine why caesarean sections are performed worsen the problem.
There is no single solution to these complex problems. We need to both improve the safety of caesarean sections and ensure they are only done when needed. To do this, we will co-develop evidence-based interventions that are acceptable, equitable, sustainable and which can be adapted or scaled up cost-effectively across settings, by collaborating with women and their support networks, healthcare providers, policymakers and other relevant stakeholders.
Who can participate?
The C-safe intervention is given at the health system level and includes all healthcare workers who provide care around the time of birth. We will be inviting women and healthcare workers to take part in surveys and interviews to understand people's thoughts and feelings on the C-Safe intervention.
What does the study involve?
The C-Safe intervention is made up of three elements:
1. C-Why; promoting appropriate caesarean section (CS) through accurate reporting of CS reasons
2. C-Op; promoting safe caesarean section through safe surgery
3. C-Non; promoting safe vaginal births, including assisted births such as vacuum
The intervention will be delivered through different types of training and learning (including feeding back the outcomes of clinical cases) and will be supported by local healthcare and community champions. The intervention will be adapted to train providers in order to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections and improve the safety of the surgery. On-site support will be provided with remote support and refresher training continuing throughout the intervention.
The study will assess the impact of the C-Safe intervention through measuring and changes in the healthcare workers' practice such as caesarean section rate and assisted vaginal birth rate. It will also measure how well the intervention has been implemented and clinical outcomes such as the deaths of mothers and babies, and the need for higher levels of care such as neonatal care and intensive care.
The hospitals included will be chosen by a “cluster randomisation”; where providers working in the hospital will take part in the intervention training. All hospitals will receive the training at some point during the study, but at different time points so we can understand the impact of the training.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
There are no direct risks involved in taking part in this study and participants can choose whether or not they to take part in the training, the interviews or the surveys.
For healthcare providers; it is expected that the training will improve the ability to provide care for women giving birth and work to improve the care of women at the facilities involved. Therefore, participation could improve job satisfaction. Surveys and interviews will be arranged at a convenient time and location.
The researchers will try to organise interviews and surveys at a time and locale suitable and most confident for the women. Women will be reassured that they will not be punished or turned away from any services at the hospital if they decide not to take part.
Where is the study run from?
The study will run in India (Andhra Pradesh) and Tanzania (Mbeya)
When is it starting and how long is it expected?
The C-Safe programme commenced in September 2022; the pilot study is anticipated the start in January 2024 in India. The cluster trial is anticipated to start 12 months after this and run for 12 months.
Who is funding the study?
Medical Research Council (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Prof. Shakila Thangaratinam (CI), S.Thangaratinam@liverpool.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific, Principal investigator
Department of Women's and Children's Health
Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences
University of Liverpool
William Henry Duncan Building
6 West Derby Street
Liverpool
L7 8TX
United Kingdom
| 0000-0002-4254-460X | |
| S.Thangaratinam@liverpool.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | A hybrid effectiveness-implementation design stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with mixed-methods evaluation using six methodological components: 1. Stakeholder consensus meetings 2. Baseline assessment of organisational readiness to change 3. Staff and service user surveys 4. Non-participant observations (meetings and clinical practice) 5. Qualitative research (interviews and focus group discussions) 6. Policy document review |
| Secondary study design | Cluster randomised trial |
| Participant information sheet | 44551_PIS_V1.0_26Oct23.pdf |
| Scientific title | Optimising maternal and perinatal outcomes through safe and appropriate caesarean sections (C-Safe) in low- and middle-income countries: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial with mixed-methods evaluation |
| Study acronym | C-Safe |
| Study objectives | The C-Safe intervention will improve maternal and perinatal outcomes following caesarean section (CS), and optimise their use, through a whole systems approach targeting the entire intrapartum period. The C-Safe intervention will be co-developed with stakeholders and incorporate evidence-based intervention(s) promoting (i) timely CS when vaginal birth is not appropriate, (ii) safety of CS when performed, and (iii) respectful and safe vaginal birth, including assisted vaginal delivery (AVD), when CS is not indicated. The intervention will be underpinned by an implementation plan addressing the clinical, social, economic, cultural and policy issues around maternity care, and be acceptable, equitable, scalable and feasible. |
| Ethics approval(s) |
1. Not yet submitted 26/06/2025, University of Liverpool Research Ethics Committee (University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, United Kingdom; +44 (0) 151 794 8290; ethics@liverpool.ac.uk), ref: - 2. Approved 29/10/2023, Fernandez Foundation Institutional Ethics Committee (4-1-1230, Bogulkunta, Off Abid Road, Hyderabad – 500001, Telangana, Hyderabad, -, India; +91 (0)40 40222300; irb@fernandez.foundation), ref: 47_2023 3. Not yet submitted, Mbeya Medical Research and Ethics Committee (PO Box 2410, Hospital Hill Road, Mbeya, PO Box 2410, Tanzania) 4. Not yet submitted, National Institute for Medical Research (3 Barack Obama Drive, PO Box 9653, Dar es Salaam, 11101, Tanzania; info@nimr.or.tz) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Labour and birth including caesarean section and assisted vaginal birth |
| Intervention | After a 2-month baseline period, clusters (public hospitals) will be randomised to the order in which they will receive the C-Safe interventional package for the remainder of the 12-month period, allowing 2 months for full implementation and embedding of the interventional package. The health facilities not receiving the interventional package will continue to follow usual care as per the baseline period until they receive the interventional package. Randomisation will be conducted by an independent statistician, with the order concealed from study investigators until one month before the start of the transition date. Clusters will be randomised to one of four sequences which will dictate the order of the roll-out of the intervention to clusters, stratified by country. The health facilities will be sufficiently geographically distanced to avoid issues around intervention contamination (e.g. staff moving from an intervention site to a control site and taking the intervention techniques with them). Follow–up will be for one month after month 12 of the intervention phase. The C-Safe intervention will include the following packages and training around the delivery of these. Audit and feedback will form part of the intervention. The components may include but are not limited to: 1. C-Why package (decision-making tools for appropriate caesarean section, audit and feedback of caesarean section indications based on the co-developed C-Why classification system). 2. C-Op package (surgical safety interventions including the WHO surgical safety checklist, team huddle and C-Op checklist, vaginal cleansing, single dose prophylactic antibiotics, incision type, surgical drapes and colour-coded suction bottles to detect post-partum haemorrhage, uterotonics, changing gloves and instruments before wound closure, delayed cord clamping and resuscitation for the baby, clinical care handover report). 3. C-Non package (promoting vaginal birth through components of the WHO labour care guide; Supportive care, shared decision making, companionship, positioning, hydration/nutrition) and assisted vaginal birth (decision-making tools and assisted vaginal birth training and equipment). Both parts of C-Non included delayed cord clamping and resuscitation for the baby and the C-Non checklist. The intervention will be delivered through different types of training and learning (including feeding back the outcomes of clinical cases) and will be supported by local healthcare and community champions. The intervention will be adapted to train providers in order to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections and improve the safety of the surgery. On-site support will be provided with remote support and refresher training continuing throughout the intervention. The study will assess the impact of the C-Safe intervention through measuring and changes in the healthcare worker's practice such as caesarean section rate and assisted vaginal birth rate. It will also measure how well the intervention has been implemented and clinical outcomes such as the deaths of mothers and babies, and the need for higher levels of care such as neonatal care and intensive care. The hospitals included will be chosen by a “cluster randomisation”; where providers working in the hospital will take part in the intervention training. All hospitals will receive the training at some point during the study, but at different time points so the researchers can understand the impact of the training. |
| Intervention type | Behavioural |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Current primary outcome measures as of 24/06/2025: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Current secondary outcome measures as of 24/06/2025: |
| Completion date | 31/08/2027 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient, Health professional |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | Female |
| Target sample size at registration | 10000 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Current participant inclusion criteria as of 24/06/2025: The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be the same for the field testing phase and the cluster trial phase, with the only exception being that the site used in the trial phase will not be eligible for inclusion in the cluster trial. Cluster: Health facilities are eligible for inclusion if: 1. Urban or peri-urban public facility 2. Secondary or tertiary-level 3. Providing comprehensive emergency obstetric care over 12 months 4. A minimum of 2,000 births/year Participants: Healthcare professionals: All healthcare professionals working in a maternity setting and delivering the interventional package will be included as participants. This includes but is not limited to midwives, nurses, nurse-midwives, anaesthetists, neonatologists, obstetricians, junior doctors/ medical officers/residents/trainees and clinical officers. Healthcare administrators and managers in charge of the maternity wards or health facilities will be included as participants. This may include, but is not limited to, the head of obstetrics, matron-in-charge, or medical/clinical director. Women: All women and pregnant people attending facilities for birth and receiving the interventional package will be included if they are giving birth during the time their site is randomized to the C-Safe interventional package. Previous participant inclusion criteria: The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be the same for the field testing phase and the cluster trial phase with the only exception being the site used in the trial phase not being eligible for inclusion in the cluster trial. Cluster: Health facilities are eligible for inclusion if: 1. Urban or peri-urban public facility 2. Secondary or tertiary-level 3. Providing comprehensive emergency obstetric care over 12 months 4. Around 4,000 births/year Participants: Healthcare professionals: All healthcare professionals working in maternity setting and delivering the interventional package will be included as participants. This includes but is not limited to midwives, nurses, nurse-midwives, anaesthetists, neonatologists, obstetricians, junior doctors/ medical officers/residents/trainees and clinical officers. Healthcare administrators and managers in charge of the maternity wards or health facilities will be included as participants. This may include but are not limited to the head of obstetrics, matron-in-charge, or medical/clinical director. Women: All women and pregnant people attending facilities for birth and receiving the interventional package will be included if they are giving birth during the time their site is randomized to the C-Safe interventional package. |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Sites used in the field-testing phase will not be eligible to participate in the stepped-wedge randomized trial 2. Sites are not providing Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care 3. Sites that were or are part of another intervention trial, or if any components of the C-Safe interventional package were previously tested on them 4. Co-enrolment with sites with existing related studies will be discouraged |
| Date of first enrolment | 08/01/2024 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2026 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- India
- Tanzania
Study participating centres
Tenali
522201
India
Mbeya
PJJR+J56
Tanzania
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
| IPD sharing plan | Requests for data generated during this study will be considered by the C-Safe team. Data will typically be available 6 months after the primary publication unless it is not possible to share the data (for example: the trial results are to be used as part of a regulatory submission, the release of the data is subject to the approval of a third party who withholds their consent, or University of Birmingham is not the controller of the data). Only scientifically sound proposals from appropriately qualified Research Groups will be considered for data sharing. The request will be reviewed by the University of Birmingham Data Sharing Committee in discussion with the CI and, where appropriate (or in the absence of the CI) any of the following: the trial sponsor, the relevant Programme Management Group (PMG), and independent TSC. A formal Data Sharing Agreement (DSA) may be required between respective organisations once the release of the data is approved and before data can be released. Data will be fully de-identified (anonymised) unless the DSA covers the transfer of participant-identifiable information. Any data transfer will use a secure and encrypted method. |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | version 1.0 | 26/10/2023 | 22/11/2023 | No | Yes |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Additional files
- 44551_PIS_V1.0_26Oct23.pdf
- Participant information sheet
Editorial Notes
25/06/2025: Sponsor changed from University of Birmingham to University of Liverpool.
24/06/2025: The following changes were made:
1. Ethics approval from the University of Birmingham International Clinical Trial Committee, dated 30/10/2023 (ref: ERN_0312-Jul2023), was replaced by details of a submission to the University of Liverpool Research Ethics Committee.
2. The primary and secondary outcome measures were updated.
3. The participant inclusion criteria were updated.
4. The target number of participants was changed from "Each health facility will have around 4,000 births each year of which 1,500 are expected to be CS, so each health facility will contribute 3,333 (=4,000*10/12) births to the analysis so a total sample size of 26,666 and 1,250 (=1,500*10/12) CS and so a total sample size of 10,000 CS. "
5. The study participating centre, Tukuyu District Hospital, was added.
11/03/2025: Internal review.
22/11/2023: Study's existence confirmed by the Medical Research Council.