Randomised trial of rapid outpatient rehydration versus hospital admission for hyperemesis gravidarum
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN47846769 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN47846769 |
| Protocol serial number | N/A |
| Sponsor | St George's Healthcare NHS Trust (UK) |
| Funders | St George's Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Discretionary Fund (UK), St George's Healthcare NHS Trust (UK) - The Directorate of Women's Health |
- Submission date
- 18/03/2008
- Registration date
- 30/06/2008
- Last edited
- 21/02/2014
- Recruitment status
- Stopped
- Overall study status
- Stopped
- Condition category
- Pregnancy and Childbirth
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
3rd Floor Lanesborough Wing
St George's University of London
Cranmer Terrace
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
| ceciliabottomley@doctors.org.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Multicentre randomised controlled trial. |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | |
| Study objectives | Vomiting is a common symptom of early pregnancy, affecting approximately 52% of women. Hyperemesis gravidarum, or severe protracted vomiting appearing for the first time before the 20th week of pregnancy that is not associated with other coincidental conditions and is of such severity as to require the patients' admission to hospital, affects only 0.3 - 1.5% of pregnancies. HG is associated with a decrease in ability to perform household activities, decreased interaction with existing children, decreased healthcare involvement and increased time off work. There is no consensus in the management and treatment of HG. The majority of the therapeutic anti-emetic treatment is empirical. Intravenous rehydration, correction of electrolyte imbalance, vitamin supplementation and anti-emetics remain the mainstay of treatment of severe disease. Women with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) who have been unable to manage with anti-emetics alone and who need rehydration have conventionally been admitted as inpatients. Rapid rehydration within a gynaecology outpatient setting has potential advantages in terms of healthcare cost and maintaining the woman within her home and family environment. Some hospitals currently operate a policy of outpatient ('day case') intravenous rehydration for HG. To date no randomised studies have been conducted comparing outpatient management for rehydration with conventional inpatient treatment. The aim of this study is therefore to assess the success of outpatient management versus inpatient management in patients with HG. Study hypothesis: Rapid outpatient rehydration is as effective as inpatient admission for the treatment for hyperemesis gravidarum. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Ethics approval received from the Royal Mardsen Research Ethics Committee on the 24th April 2007 (ref: 07/Q0806/2). |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Hyperemesis gravidarum |
| Intervention | Comparison of conventional inpatient continuous intravenous rehydration for women with HG with daily attendance at the Acute Gynaecology Unit for rehydration over four hours. The same anti-emetic and vitamin supplementation will be given to both groups. Women are randomised by computer generated allocation. All women will be given a single intravenous dose of cyclizine at first attendance followed by regular buccal prochlorperazine 3 mg (increased to 6 mg if ineffective). In addition, when tolerating oral input, all participants will be given oral thiamine 50 mg three times daily and folic acid 5 mg once daily. A single dose of intravenous ranitidine 50 mg will be administered to women reporting epigastric discomfort, followed by 150 mg orally twice daily. Both groups will receive intravenous fluids. The inpatient group will receive 4 litres normal saline over the first 24 hours followed by 3 litres per 24 hours. The outpatient group will receive 2 litres per day, each administered over 4 hours. Treatment in both groups will continue until: 1. There is no ketonuria, and 2. The woman is able to tolerate food and drink, and 3. There has been no vomiting for at least 12 hours For both groups, follow up 7 days after completion of treatment will be carried out by telephone to ascertain whether they are still using anti-emetics and whether they have had any re-admissions. Updated 21/02/2014: The trial did not start as the clinical fellow left the position and there was no funding to support a further research post at the time. |
| Intervention type | Drug |
| Phase | Not Specified |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Cyclizine, prochlorperazine, thiamine, folic acid, ranitidine |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
A difference between the two groups in reduction in Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis (PUQE) score at 48 hours. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
A difference between the two groups in: |
| Completion date | 01/04/2009 |
| Reason abandoned (if study stopped) | Lack of funding/sponsorship |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | Female |
| Target sample size at registration | 100 |
| Key inclusion criteria | All pregnant women up to 20 weeks gestation referred to the Acute Gynaecology Unit with persistent vomiting and at least 1+ ketonuria. |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Women greater than 20 weeks gestation 2. Women with another medical condition manifesting as nausea and vomiting such as urinary tract infection (UTI) 3. Type 1 or 2 diabetes 4. Potassium less than 3.2 mmol/l 5. Sodium less than 130 mmol/l 6. Abnormal liver function tests (associated with increased severity of HG) 7. Abnormal thyroid function tests (associated with increased severity of HG) |
| Date of first enrolment | 17/03/2008 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/04/2009 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |