Comparision of epidural versus parental analgesia after colorectal surgery

ISRCTN ISRCTN48277388
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN48277388
Protocol serial number N0084120704
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
Funder The North and South Bank Research and Development Consortium (UK)
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
01/11/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Edward Smyth
Scientific

Academic Surgical Unit
Castle Hill Hospital
Castle Rd
Cottingham, East Yorkshire
HU16 5JQ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1482 875 875

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo evaluate the optimal method of pain control after such surgery.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: Colorectal
InterventionRandomised controlled trial comparing
1. Morphine in a drip
2. Morphine in a drip plus ketamine infusion
3. Epidural analgesia in the spine

Currently pain relief is provided by the patient having a button to press to deliver themselves some pain relieving drug. Every hour a nurse will check the patient and observe to make sure the patient is alright and happy with the pain relief. The nurse will ask a few questions on the quality of pain relief. The patient will be asked to do some deep breathing and to cough to aid this assessment.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)

The patient will receive one of three pain control regimes:
1. Morphine in a drip
2. Morphine in a drip plus ketamine infusion
3. Epidural analgesia in their back (spine).

The study is to compare the quality and quantity of pain relief, side effects and satisfaction with different drugs and methods of delivery.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date01/12/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration297
Key inclusion criteria297 Samples are required. Normal post-operative analgesic requirements with some patients requiring ketamine. Input from pain management team.
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not meet inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment22/03/2002
Date of final enrolment01/12/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Academic Surgical Unit
Cottingham, East Yorkshire
HU16 5JQ
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan