ISRCTN ISRCTN49349244
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN49349244
Protocol serial number MCH 02-19
Sponsor Record Provided by the NHS R&D 'Time-Limited' National Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Funder NHS Mother and Child Health National Research and Development Programme (UK)
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
21/12/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Christine MacArthur
Scientific

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology
Medical School
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 4146770
Email c.macarthur@bham.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleA randomised controlled trial of two types of epidural analgesia evaluating short and long term outcomes, including backache
Study acronymCOMET
Study objectivesUsing a randomised controlled design we propose to investigate
1. Whether an epidural technique which provides minimal motor block is associated with differences in the more traditional technique and
2. Whether there are any variations in these respects between two different types of minimal motor block epidural techniques

Please note that as of 21/12/09, this record was updated to include information on ethics approval, target number of participants and publications.
Ethics approval(s)Approval received from Birmingham and Leicester research ethics committees (added 21/12/09)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedChildbirth
Intervention1. Standard epidural
2. Mobile combined spinal-epidural
3. Mobile 'Boston' epidural.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date01/10/2001

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target sample size at registration1050
Key inclusion criteriaWomen who have decided to have an epidural. Patient consent to take part in the trial can only be fully given at the time of deciding to have an epidural, but to avoid 'cold' decision making in labour an explanatory leaflet will be provided for all primiparae at the last routine hospital antenatal visit (approximately 34 weeks). Only primigravida will be recruited in order to make a meaningful comparison of obstetric performance, given the profound effect of parity on the main outcome measure, and to avoid 'contamination' of experience and recall of backache after previous deliveries.
Key exclusion criteriaWomen who require regional block anaesthesia for an elective section or for imminent operative delivery will be excluded. Additionally, those who have contra-indications to spinal or epidural analgesia (e.g. coagulopathy, cardiomyopathy, valvular cardiac disease, abnormal vertebral anatomy, etc) or to any drug in the study will also be excluded.
Date of first enrolment01/07/1997
Date of final enrolment01/10/2001

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 07/07/2001 Yes No
Results article results 01/12/2002 Yes No
Results article results on urinary catheterisation with anaesthesia 01/01/2009 Yes No
Results article results on ambulation in labour and delivery mode with anaesthesia 01/03/2009 Yes No
Results article results 01/01/2010 Yes No