Non-randomised trial of a lipid lowering drug and a steroid for the treatment of acute myeloblastic leukaemia

ISRCTN ISRCTN50635541
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN50635541
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
03/07/2008
Registration date
25/07/2008
Last edited
28/09/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Mark Drayson
Scientific

Clinical Immunology and Division of Immunity and Infection
The Medical School
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designInterventional multicentre non-randomised phase II study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designNon randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleThe use of Bezfibrate and medroxyProgesterone acetate in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and refractory anaemia with excess of blasts (RAEB) type 2: a phase II non-randomised trial
Study acronymBaP in AML
Study objectivesThat patients with acute myeloblastic leukaemia (AML) who would not otherwise receive anti-leukaemia therapy will respond to therapy with bezafibrate and medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from:
1. The South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee on the 9th April 2003 (ref: 5355)
2. University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire Research and Development Department on the 7th July 2004 (ref: NJ02/0304/EU)
3. The Research Ethics Committee of Glasgow Royal Infirmary on the 24th July 2003 (ref: 03HA010)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedElderly and relapsed high risk acute myeloid leukaemia
Intervention1. Bezafibrate (Bezalip-Mono) 400 mg daily
2. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (Provera) 200 mg twice daily

Patients will also be given a prophylactic vitamin supplement so that they are not deficient in vitamins A and D, multivitamin tablet containing minimum vitamin A 4000 units and vitamin D 400 units.

Treatment was for 18 weeks. All patients were followed up to death (range of follow up was 8 days to 102 weeks from trial entry); one patient is still alive.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase II
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Bezafibrate, medroxyprogesterone acetate
Primary outcome measureTumour response as measured by:
1. Full blood count
2. Transfusion dependency (frequency of red blood cells/platelet transfusions)
3. Percentage blasts in bone marrow and peripheral blood pre and post BaP therapy
4. Bone marrow morphology as determined by blood smears

Response will be assessed using Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria as modified from National Cancer Institute (NCI-) sponsored workshop guidelines.
1. Complete response (CR): less than 5% blasts in a marrow of sufficient cellularity with a peripheral neutrophil count greater than 1 x 10^9/l and platelet count of greater than 100 x 10^9/l determined by two evaluations not less than 4 weeks apart
2. Partial response (PR): as determined by two evaluations not less than 4 weeks apart:
2.1. In RAEB type 2 bone marrow should show greater than 50% decrease in myeloblasts, but not necessarily disappearance of marrow dyspoiesis. In peripheral blood, greater than 50% reduction in deficit from minimum normal levels (UHB haematology reference range) of the haemoglobin, neutrophil and platelet counts (if abnormal at baseline) with an absence of myeloblasts in the peripheral blood.
2.2. In AML bone marrow should show less than 15% myeloblasts with a decrease but not necessarily a disappearance of marrow dyspoiesis with an absence of Auer rods. Plus in peripheral blood there should be a greater than 50% reduction in deficit from minimum normal levels (UHB haematology reference range) of haemoglobin, neutrophil and platelet counts (if abnormal at baseline) with absence of myeloblasts in the peripheral blood.
3. Minor response (MR): decrease in frequency of infections or bleeding episodes and a 50% decrease in transfusion requirements, decrease of marrow dyspoiesis and improvement in peripheral counts but not enough to qualify for PR or CR nor progressive disease can be established
4. No change: neither the criteria for CR, PR, MR nor progressive disease can be established
5. Progressive disease: evidence of increased blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/06/2003
Completion date01/04/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants20
Key inclusion criteria1. Patient has acute myeloid leukaemia (this can be any type of de novo or secondary AML, except acute promyelocytic leukaemia), or
2. Patient has refractory anaemia with an excess of blasts (greater than 10%) RAEB type 2 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria
3. Adult patients, either sex
Key exclusion criteria1. Patient has acute promyelocytic leukaemia
2. Intensive chemotherapy is considered a suitable option
3. Low dose cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely to be required to control a rising blast cell count in the next month
4. Patient has a concurrent active malignancy
5. Patient has uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. hypertension, diabetes) or severe cardiovascular disease
6. Patient is pregnant or lactating, or are potentially fertile (both males and females) and have not agreed to take adequate contraceptive precautions during the trial
7. Patient aged under 18 years
Date of first enrolment01/06/2003
Date of final enrolment01/04/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Clinical Immunology and Division of Immunity and Infection,
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Trust Headquarters
PO Box 9551
Main Drive
Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2PR
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.uhb.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/014ja3n03

Funders

Funder type

Government

The University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UK) - paying incidental costs

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/04/2010 Yes No