Understanding motivation problems in clinical disorders

ISRCTN ISRCTN51908674
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN51908674
IRAS number 336513
Secondary identifying numbers ERN_1761-Oct2023, CPMS 63297
Submission date
02/09/2024
Registration date
03/09/2024
Last edited
08/10/2024
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
The aim of the study is to gain a better understanding of goal-directed decision-making and how it goes wrong in Parkinson's disease and early psychosis - although very different disorders, both are associated with motivation problems and underpinned by dysregulation of dopamine signalling.
Motivation is a broad term that encompasses many different processes, pathways and neural substrates. It is clear that no one’s experience of ‘apathy’ is the same, and this may relate to subtle differences in the pathways in the brain affected. For instance, people might lose their interest in learning things, connecting with family members or doing hobbies. This could be, for instance, because these activities take on less value in the currency of the brain, because of difficulty converting a decision into an action, because of greater attendance to the effortful 'costs' of an action, or due to difficulties of planning or ability to maintain drive and attention towards a goal. These distinct processes could all lead to a similar observation of less goal-directed behaviour.
The idea of this project is to try and scrutinise processes like those described above using a novel, decision-making experiment, and, importantly, to see if it correlates with how people describe their motivation symptoms. A related aim is to see how physical effort and having more options to choose from affects decision-making, and (in patients with Parkinson's disease) how dopamine can influence choices. The researchers will also use modern computational modelling techniques to better understand aspects of the decision-making process (a tool increasingly being used to understand these complex processes). They also hope to conduct a qualitative study on a subset of participants to better understand the behavioural data.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18-80 years with Parkinson's disease or aged 18-40 years with early psychosis

What does the study involve?
Participants with Parkinson's disease will be invited to participate in two sessions, once having taken, the other having delayed, their usual dopaminergic medication. Each study session takes around 2 - 2.5 hours. Participants will complete a computer-based decision-making task (about 1 hour and 15 minutes), clinical assessments and questionnaires (about 40 minutes). For a segment of the decision-making task, participants' decisions will determine the amount of physical effort that participants will need to exert via a grip force device. A subset of participants will participate in a clinical interview at a later date to enable qualitative exploration of motivation problems for use in mixed methods research.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
It is hoped that this research will make progress in distinguishing the different processes in individuals experiencing motivation problems, which could in turn lead to better and more accurate identification of these symptoms in the clinic and even targeted treatments. There is no immediate benefit for participants aside from contributing to research. The main risks relate to the use of the grip force device, which may include discomfort or musculoskeletal complications (participants with known wrist injuries or carpal tunnel syndrome will be excluded from participation).

Where is the study run from?
University of Birmingham (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2024 to October 2025

Who is funding the study?
Wellcome Trust (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Jamie Talbot, jxt289@student.bham.ac.uk

Contact information

Prof Matthew Broome
Principal Investigator

Institute for Mental Health
School of Psychology
52 Pritchatts Road
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-6963-8884
Phone +44 (0)121 414 3344
Email m.r.broome@bham.ac.uk
Prof Matthew Apps
Scientific

Centre for Human Brain Health
School of Psychology
52 Pritchatts Road
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-5793-2202
Phone +44 (0)121 414 6261
Email m.a.j.apps@bham.ac.uk
Dr Jamie Talbot
Public, Scientific

Centre for Human Brain Health
School of Psychology
52 Pritchatts Road
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-4720-1972
Phone +44 (0)121 414 6261
Email jtalbot.esq@gmail.com

Study information

Study designBasic science study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCross sectional study
Study setting(s)University/medical school/dental school
Study typeOther
Participant information sheet 46026_PIS_qualitative_v1.1.pdf
Scientific titleDynamics of motivated decision-making in striatal disorders
Study objectivesThe main hypotheses are that self-reported apathy scores, or boosting dopamine in Parkinson's disease, will relate to one or more metrics of decision-making. The main outcome variables for analysis will be reaction times, choice accuracy, or model parameters fitted using sequential sampling models

The key hypotheses are:
1. Apathy (and/or its behavioural dimension) will be associated with greater caution in decisions involving physical effort
2. Apathy or its component dimensions will be associated with slower information processing (slower drift rates) or greater caution (higher thresholds) in decisions involving more options
3. Boosting dopamine will reduce caution (lower thresholds) in choices leading to physical effort due to reduced aversion to effort, or reduced drift rates, non-decision time or thresholds in tasks choices leading to rewards.
4. Boosting dopamine may lead to lower subjective ratings of choice difficulty/cognitive effort.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 22/07/2024, London - South East Research Ethics Committee (Health Research Authority, 2 Redman Place, Stratford, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom; +44 (0)20 7104 8222; londonsoutheast.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 24/LO/0512

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedParkinson's disease and early psychosis
InterventionParticipants will complete a computer-based decision-making task, as well as questionnaires probing mood, motivation and cognition. Participants with Parkinson's disease will perform two sessions, once having delayed their usual dopaminergic medication and once within 4 hours of taking their medication. Patients with psychosis will perform one session. A subset of participants will be invited to participate in a qualitative interview at a later date.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure1. Reaction time (relating to stimulus presentation to choice interval) measured on each trial; total trials = 320 per experimental session.
2. Choice (relating to which of available options was chosen, corresponding to a level of effort or reward) - measured on each trial; total trials = 320 per experimental session.
3. Self-rated apathy measured using The Dimensional Apathy Scale - total score and dimensional subscores (auto-activation, affective and executive dimensions). Administered once during the first experimental session.
4. (Qualitative study only): Lived experience of apathy symptoms gleaned from clinical interviews in a subset of participants after completing the behavioural task. Leading questions are based on the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS).
Secondary outcome measures1. Global cognition measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) during the first experimental session
2. Mood measured using Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) during the first experimental session
3. Anhedonia measured using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) during the first experimental session
4. Apathy measured using the Apathy Motivation Index (AMI) during the first experimental session
5. Volume of spontaneous thought, measured using Adapted Glasgow Content of Thoughts Inventory (GCTI) during the first experimental session
6. Fatigue measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) during the first experimental session
7. Working memory measured using the digit span test during the first experimental session
8. (Patients with Parkinson's disease): Parkinson's symptom severity measured using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) during the first experimental session. UPDRS part III (motor exam) will also be performed during the second session
9. (Patients with psychosis): Negative symptom burden measured using Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) during the first session
10. Subjective ratings of choice difficulty (sliding scale between 0-10) recorded during the behavioural task (84 ratings per session)
11. Physical force production (area under curve, maximum force, yank force) recorded during the behavioural task (recorded on every trial of effort subtask; total 160 trials per experimental session)
Overall study start date04/01/2024
Completion date25/10/2025

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient, Service user
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit80 Years
SexMale
Target number of participants200
Key inclusion criteriaInclusion criteria for those with early psychosis:
1. Aged 18-40 years (inclusive) at the time of eligibility assessment
2. Able to understand written and spoken English
3. Meets one or more criteria for Ultra High Risk for psychosis groups as assessed by the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States (CAARMS) or the Structured Interview for Psychosis –Risk Syndromes (SIPS), the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) and the Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale (FIGS)
4. Meets criteria for early/first episode psychosis (meet International Classification of Diseases [ICD-10] criteria for a diagnosis of schizophrenia and related psychoses (ICD-10 code F20, F22, F25, F28, F29) and within 3 years of first diagnosis of psychotic disorder at the time of eligibility assessment

Inclusion criteria for those with Parkinson's disease:
1. Age 18-80 years (inclusive)
2. Formal diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
3. Able to understand written and spoken English
4. Hoehn and Yahr Parkinson's grade 1 – 4
Key exclusion criteria1. Lack of capacity/inability to consent
2. Significant neurological or psychiatric comorbidity other than psychosis/at-risk mental state (e.g. significant mood disorder, nervous system disorders such as stroke, traumatic brain injury)
3. Current or lifetime diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder, autism or other neurodevelopmental disorder
4. Significant risk to self or other people, as determined by their clinical team
5. Detained under the Mental Health Act
6. History of alcohol or substance use disorder (abuse/dependence) within 6 months prior to eligibility assessment (nicotine and caffeine dependence are not exclusionary)
7. Significant upper limb motor impairment (i.e. that would impair squeezing a handheld force-meter or clicking a mouse/button)
8. Significant wrist injuries, carpal tunnel syndrome, or musculoskeletal problems that would cause discomfort in squeezing tasks
9. Bed-bound or unable to attend University for in-person study
Date of first enrolment20/08/2024
Date of final enrolment25/10/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

University of Birmingham
School of psychology
52 Pritchatts Road
Edgbaston
Birimingham
B15 2SA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Birmingham
University/education

Birmingham Research Park
97 Vincent Drive
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2SQ
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)7814 650003
Email researchgovernance@contacts.bham.ac.uk
Website http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/index.aspx
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03angcq70

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Wellcome Trust
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
Wellcome, WT
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date25/10/2025
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryStored in publicly available repository, Available on request
Publication and dissemination planThe researchers plan to publish the results in leading scientific journals and submit for peer review within a year of the study end date
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during the current study will be stored in a publicly available repository or will be available upon request from Jamie Talbot (jtalbot.esq@gmail.com).

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet version 1.1 04/01/2024 03/09/2024 No Yes
Participant information sheet People with Parkinson's disease
version 1.2
17/07/2024 03/09/2024 No Yes
Participant information sheet People with psychosis
version 1.1
04/01/2024 03/09/2024 No Yes
Protocol file version 1.1 04/01/2024 03/09/2024 No No

Additional files

46026_PIS_behavioural_PD_v1.2.pdf
People with Parkinson's disease
46026_PIS_behavioural_PwPsychosis_v1.1.pdf
People with psychosis
46026_PIS_qualitative_v1.1.pdf
46026_PROTOCOL_v1.1.pdf

Editorial Notes

08/10/2024: Internal review.
02/09/2024: Study's existence confirmed by the HRA.