Expression of CUG2, βIGH3 (TGFBI), and TGF-β in bronchoscopic biopsy specimens of lung cancer patients

ISRCTN ISRCTN52550559
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN52550559
Süleyman Demirel University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (SDÜ-BAP) Grant No TDK-2019-6958
Sponsor Süleyman Demirel University
Funder Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Submission date
06/06/2026
Registration date
11/06/2026
Last edited
11/06/2026
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Lung cancer is one of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide. When patients are first diagnosed, doctors need to know whether the cancer has spread (metastasized) to other parts of the body, and whether the tumor in the chest is a primary lung cancer or a cancer that has spread from elsewhere. This information is critical for choosing the right treatment.

This study investigates whether three proteins — CUG2, βIGH3 (also called TGFBI), and TGF-β — measured in tissue samples taken during a bronchoscopy (a routine procedure where a thin flexible tube is passed into the airways to take small tissue samples) can help answer these questions.

Who can participate?
Adults aged 18 years or older who are undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected lung cancer or suspected spread of another cancer to the chest. Patients must have a confirmed tissue diagnosis and adequate biopsy sample quality for laboratory analysis.

What does the study involve?
Participants undergo routine diagnostic bronchoscopy as part of their standard clinical care. A small additional portion of the biopsy sample obtained during this procedure is used for laboratory analysis. Gene expression levels of three biomarkers (CUG2, βIGH3/TGFBI, and TGF-β) are measured using a technique called quantitative PCR (qPCR). No additional procedures, medications, or interventions are administered. Cancer spread (metastatic status) is determined by PET/CT scan as part of routine staging.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits or risks to participants from this study. The biopsy is performed as part of standard diagnostic care. The biomarker measurements are performed on existing tissue samples and do not require any additional procedures. Results are not used to guide individual patient treatment in this study.

Where is the study run from?
Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pulmonology, Turkey.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2019 to June 2022

Who is funding the study?
Süleyman Demirel University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Turkey.

Who is the main contact?
Dr. Önder Öztürk, Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pulmonology, Turkey, dronderozturk@gmail.com

Contact information

Mr Onder Ozturk
Principal investigator, Scientific, Public

Department of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University
Isparta, Merkez
32200
Türkiye

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-8570-2172
Phone +905322677973
Email dronderozturk@gmail.com

Study information

Primary study designObservational
Observational study designProspective observational diagnostic accuracy study
Scientific titleExpression of CUG2, βIGH3 (TGFBI), and TGF-β in bronchoscopic biopsy specimens of lung cancer patients: predictive value for metastasis and differential diagnosis from other thoracic malignancies — a pilot study
Study objectives 1. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CUG2, βIGH3 (TGFBI), and TGF-β gene expression in bronchoscopic biopsy specimens for predicting metastatic status at the time of lung cancer diagnosis (primary objective).
2. To assess the utility of CUG2, βIGH3 (TGFBI), and TGF-β expression for differential diagnosis of primary lung cancer
from other thoracic malignancies.
3. To examine correlations between biomarker expression levels and clinical variables including age, smoking history,
PET/CT stage, and overall survival.
4. To evaluate the prognostic significance of biomarker expression for overall survival using Kaplan-Meier and
Cox regression analyses.
5. To compare biomarker expression across histopathological subtypes (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and
small cell lung cancer).
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 13/12/2018, Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dekanlığı Morfoloji Binası İdari Ofisler 2. Kat Doğu Kampüsü Çünür, Isparta, Merkez, 32260, Türkiye; +90246 211 32 30; tipetik@sdu.edu.tr), ref: 239

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLung cancer; thoracic malignancy; lung neoplasms; bronchoscopic biopsy; metastasis; differential diagnosis
MethodologyThis is a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study. No intervention was administered to participants.

Index test: Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) measurement of CUG2, βIGH3 (TGFBI), and TGF-β gene expression using the
2^−ΔΔCt method with β-actin as reference gene, performed on RNA extracted from bronchoscopic biopsy specimens obtained during routine diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Reference standard: Metastatic status determined by PET/CT imaging and thoracic CT in accordance with the 8th edition
TNM classification; histopathological diagnosis confirmed from bronchoscopic biopsy specimens.

Non-randomised. Participants were assigned to study groups (primary lung cancer vs. other thoracic malignancies;
metastatic vs. non-metastatic) based on histopathological diagnosis and PET/CT findings at the time of diagnostic
bronchoscopy, not by randomisation.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Diagnostic accuracy of CUG2 expression for predicting metastatic status at diagnosis measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence interval derived by bootstrap resampling (2000 iterations), with optimal cut‑off determined by Youden Index and corresponding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy reported at a single time point at diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy between January 2018 and January 2022
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off validation for biomarkers measured using ROC curve analysis: AUC with 95% CI by bootstrap resampling (2000 iterations); optimal cut-off by Youden Index; sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV at optimal cut-off. Mann-Whitney U test for between-group comparison; rank-biserial correlation for effect size; and, ROC curve analysis: AUC with 95% CI by bootstrap resampling (2000 iterations); sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV at Youden-optimal cut-off at a single time point at diagnosis (January 2018 – January 2022)
  2. Correlation analysis measured using Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ) with two-sided p-value; point-biserial correlation for biomarker vs. metastatic status (binary variable), at a single time point at diagnosis (January 2018 – January 2022)
  3. Survival analysis (prognosis) measured using Kaplan-Meier survival curves; log-rank test (χ²) for between-group comparison; median OS with 95% CI; 1-year OS rate. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression: hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI.5.Kruskal-Wallis H test for overall between-subtype comparison; Dunn post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons, at a single time point at diagnosis (January 2018 – January 2022)
Completion date20/06/2022

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit99 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration49
Total final enrolment57
Key inclusion criteria1. Adult patients aged 18 years or older
2. Undergoing diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) for suspected primary lung cancer or suspected thoracic involvement by an extrapulmonary malignancy
3. Histopathologically confirmed diagnosis from bronchoscopic biopsy specimen
4. Adequate RNA yield from biopsy specimen (A260/A280 ratio 1.7–2.0)
5. Written informed consent obtained prior to enrollment
Key exclusion criteria1. Benign histology on bronchoscopic biopsy specimen
2. Insufficient RNA yield from biopsy specimen (A260/A280 ratio outside 1.7–2.0 range)
3. Non-evaluable biomarker measurements
4. Duplicate patient records
5. Age under 18 years
6. Refusal to provide written informed consent
Date of first enrolment01/01/2019
Date of final enrolment01/01/2022

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Türkiye

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Statistical Analysis Plan version 1.0 01/06/2026 11/06/2026 No No

Additional files

49667_SAP_v1.0_01June2026.pdf
Statistical Analysis Plan

Editorial Notes

08/06/2026: Study’s existence confirmed by the Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Turkey.