Investigating an environmental intervention for office workers with poor sleep
ISRCTN | ISRCTN53468732 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN53468732 |
- Submission date
- 11/03/2025
- Registration date
- 13/03/2025
- Last edited
- 13/03/2025
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Nervous System Diseases
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
This study is being conducted to explore whether changes in how office workers - individuals who spend most of their workday seated at a desk indoors - interact with their environment can improve their sleep quality. Sleep difficulties are common among adults and can lead to problems such as poor concentration and reduced productivity. This research aims to assess an intervention that could enhance sleep, ultimately benefiting daily well-being and performance.
Who can participate?
Adults aged 23 to 65 years old who are experiencing difficulties with their sleep and are currently employed in a job where they spend the majority of their day sitting at a desk, indoors (i.e., an office worker), working full-time (usually from 9 AM to 5 PM, Monday to Friday) within Oxford.
What does this study involve?
At the start of the study, participants will receive study equipment, instructions, and an intake questionnaire. The study lasts six weeks, beginning with a two-week baseline phase, followed by a four-week intervention phase.
Throughout the study, participants will:
• Wear an actigraph and a Button device for the full 6 weeks.
• Complete daily sleep and activity diaries( 'My Sleep' upon waking and 'My Day' before bedtime).
• Record significant events in a "My Events" Log.
• Wear a HSM sleep EEG device for one night at the end of Week 2 and Week 6 (total: 2 nights).
• Complete six to eight questionnaires at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6, plus two final questionnaires at the study's conclusion.
For the intervention, participants will receive two educational booklets and attend five researcher-led sessions—one in person and four online (via video conferencing, e.g., Microsoft Teams). All study activities will take place within participants' regular routines. At the end of the study, all equipment must be returned. Some participants may also be invited to a follow-up interview to discuss their experiences with the study and intervention.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits:
There will be no direct benefit to participants taking part in this study, other than potential improvements to their sleep.
Participants will receive a £100 Amazon voucher for participating in the full study. They will receive a £20 Amazon voucher for completing the first two weeks of the study (Weeks 1 and 2). For completing the last 4 weeks of the study (Weeks 3 to 6 + Study End), they will receive an £80 Amazon voucher. Payment will be given once they have successfully returned the sensors after the six-week study period. To simplify the payment process, they will be given the full payment of vouchers (£100) at the end of the study, unless they request otherwise. If a participant takes part in the follow-up interview, they will receive an additional £15 Amazon voucher for their time.
Risks:
1. Wearing the Sensors: The actiwatch needs to be worn both day and night, and the button sensor throughout the day. To take part in the study, this would need to be feasible within the participant's daily routine, job responsibilities, or any other tasks they undertake. They may experience some irritation from wearing the actiwatch; if this is the case, alternative arrangements will be made.
2. Emotional Repercussions from questionnaires: The questionnaires will ask about participants' mental health. Reflecting on certain emotions can sometimes be distressing. These questionnaires are for data collection only and are not meant as a treatment or diagnosis. If participants feel overwhelmed or distressed during the study, they can reach out to the study team immediately. More generally, if they are concerned about any aspect of their health during the study, it is recommended that they contact their GP. For additional support or information, participants can consider the following resources:
- https://oxfordshirerecoverycollege.org.uk/signposting/
- https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/residents/social-and-health-care/health-recovery-and-wellbeing/mental-wellbeing?utm_term=nil
3. Privacy Concerns About Sensor Data: Some participants might be concerned that the sensors could reveal specific activities they engage in. These sensors are designed to track sleep-wake patterns and cannot determine the exact nature of activities participants are involved in. It is important to note, however, that the HSM device records sound in the environment, however, this is heavily filtered such that conversations cannot be heard (the audio is highly muffled). Whether participants choose to wear this device or not is entirely optional.
Where is the study run from?
University of Oxford (UK).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2023 to January 2026
Who is funding the study?
1. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)
2. Better Sleep: NIHR Oxford Health BRC
3. Dr Mortimer and Theresa Sackler Foundation
Who is the main contact?
Prof Simon Kyle, simon.kyle@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
Contact information
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator
Sir Jules Thorn Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin Building, South Parks Road, University of Oxford
Oxford
OX1 3QU
United Kingdom
0000-0002-9581-5311 | |
Phone | +44 (0)1865 618675 |
simon.kyle@ndcn.ox.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Single-centre single-arm interventional feasibility and acceptability trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Non randomised study |
Study setting(s) | Home, Internet/virtual, Laboratory, Workplace |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet |
Scientific title | Investigating the feasibility and acceptability of an environmental Intervention foR offIce workers with poor Sleep |
Study acronym | IRIS |
Study objectives | Primary [Feasibility] Recruitment: 1. To assess the percentage of individuals eligible to participate in the trial. Intervention Fidelity: 2. To assess the average percentage of intervention content delivered in each intervention session. 3. To assess the average percentage of intervention sessions attended. Data Completeness: 4. To assess the percentage of participants that provide complete Insomnia Severity Index data at the primary endpoint. Primary [Acceptability] 5. To assess participants’ self-report assessment of the overall acceptability of the intervention and study procedures. Secondary 1. To assess the potential effectiveness of our intervention, we will evaluate changes in time spent exposed to environmental factors during the day (wake-up to 8 pm). 2. To assess the potential effectiveness of our intervention, we will evaluate changes in time spent exposed to environmental factors during the evening (8 pm to bedtime). 3. To assess the potential effectiveness of our intervention, we will evaluate changes in time spent exposed to environmental factors at night (bedtime to wake-up). 4. To assess the effect of our intervention on insomnia symptoms, we will evaluate changes in the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score. Exploratory 1. To assess the potential effectiveness of our intervention, we will evaluate changes in time spent exposed to environmental factors during the day, evening, and night using a different quantity to our secondary objectives. 2. To assess the potential effectiveness of our intervention, we will evaluate the rate of change in time spent exposed to environmental factors across the day (wake-up to 8 pm), evening (8 pm to bedtime), and night (bedtime to wake-up). 3. To assess the potential effectiveness of our intervention, we will evaluate the rate of change in self-reported exposure to environmental factors. 4. To assess the effect of the intervention on the regularity of exposure to environmental factors. 5. To assess the effect of the intervention on environmental exposure timing variability, we will evaluate changes in mean environmental timing for daytime, evening, and night. 6. To assess how environmental exposure differs between settings (Home, Office, Hybrid, Off-Work) and how these differences change over time. Specifically, we will evaluate time spent exposed to environmental factors during the day (wake-up to 8 pm). 7. To assess the agreement between self-reported and objective measures of environmental exposure, we will conduct a modified Bland-Altman analysis. Additionally, we will determine whether participants improve in their accuracy of their self-reported environmental exposure estimations. 8. To assess the effect of our intervention on insomnia symptoms, we will also compare changes in the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) mid intervention. 9. To evaluate the effect of our intervention on sleep and circadian rhythms using data from actigraphs (ActTrust 2), sleep EEG (HST REM), and the Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD). 10. To assess the impact of our intervention on fatigue symptoms, using the Flinders Fatigue Scale (FFS). 11. To assess the effect of our intervention on sleep hygiene behaviours using the Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI). 12. To assess the effect of our intervention on chronotype using the Reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ) and Ultra Short Munich ChronoType Questionnaire. 13. To assess the effect of our intervention on anxiety symptoms using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7). 14. To assess the effect of our intervention on depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). 15. To assess the effect of our intervention on work performance using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI:SHP). 16. To assess the effect of our intervention on activity using self-report data from our My Day diary. 17. To investigate whether changes in environmental exposure mediate improvements in insomnia symptoms, sleep and circadian rhythms, fatigue, chronotype (shift towards morningness/early-type), anxiety, depressive symptoms, and work productivity. 18. To assess the bidirectional relationship between environmental exposure and sleep hygiene over time. 19. To assess the perceived credibility of our intervention (acceptability). 20. To qualitatively assess the acceptability of the intervention and study procedures using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. 21. To assess the barriers and facilitators faced by participants when carrying out the intervention behaviours in terms of their Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B). 22. To identify whether self-report screening variables predict low baseline environmental exposure. 23. To explore whether satellite-based measurements of environmental data reflect personal environmental exposure. |
Ethics approval(s) |
1. Approved 15/11/2023, University of Oxford’s Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee (Research Services, University of Oxford, Boundary Brook House, Churchill Drive, Oxford, OX3 7GB, United Kingdom; +44 (0)1865(6)16577; ethics@medsci.ox.ac.uk), ref: MS IDREC R86336/RE001 2. Approved 13/02/2025, University of Oxford’s Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee (Research Services, University of Oxford, Boundary Brook House, Churchill Drive, Oxford, OX3 7GB, United Kingdom; +44 (0)1865(6)16577; ethics@medsci.ox.ac.uk), ref: MS IDREC R86336/RE002 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Modifying the behaviour of office workers to improve sleep |
Intervention | The intervention will be delivered to participants through a combination of in-person and video conferencing sessions (e.g., Microsoft Teams). The intervention consists of five sessions conducted over four weeks. Participants will receive two educational booklets after the first session. These materials are to be studied by participants. The first session will be conducted in person, with the option to use video conferencing software if necessary. This session will include an educational component lasting approximately 10–20 minutes, followed by a review of the participant's environmental data. Barriers and facilitators to healthy environmental behaviours will be identified, and the researcher will work with the participant to set personalised environmental behaviour goals to be achieved before the next session. The first session will last approximately one hour. The subsequent four sessions will be conducted via video conferencing (e.g., Microsoft Teams), although participants may opt to attend in person at the Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin Building, University of Oxford. These sessions will focus on reviewing the participant's environmental data, addressing barriers and facilitators, and setting new environmental behaviour goals. Each of these follow-up sessions will last approximately 30–45 minutes. Participants will not be randomised into arms, as this is a single-arm intervention. The primary focus is on encouraging participants to improve their environmental behaviours. |
Intervention type | Behavioural |
Primary outcome measure | Primary [Feasibility] Recruitment: 1. Eligibility percentage will be determined using output from the Qualtrics screening survey and screening call. Measured pre-baseline, assessed monthly. Intervention Fidelity: 2. Intervention Fidelity will be measured using audio recordings of the intervention sessions. Measured during each intervention session (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and assessed per intervention session. 3. Intervention attendance will be measured using an attendance register during the intervention sessions. Measured during each intervention session (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and assessed per intervention session. Data Completeness: 4. Data Completeness will be assessed using output from the REDCap hosted Insomnia Severity Index Questionnaire. Primary end point assessed at 4 weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. Primary [Acceptability] 5. The overall acceptability of the intervention and study procedures will be assessed using a custom Acceptability Questionnaire; the results will be reported as the mean and median Likert values. Additionally, the percentage of participants who selected each Likert option (completely unacceptable, unacceptable, no opinion, acceptable, completely acceptable) will be reported. Measured and assessed at the end of the study. |
Secondary outcome measures | Secondary outcome measures: 1/2/3. Environmental data will be recorded using the Button device. Objective environmental data will be measured continuously across the 6-week study period. Changes from baseline will be assessed at 1 week following the delivery of the fourth intervention session. 4. Insomnia symptom severity measured using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6 (fortnightly). We will assess changes from baseline at 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. Exploratory outcome measures: 1/2. Objective environmental data measured using the Button device continuously across the 6-week study period, changes assessed at 1 week following the delivery of the fourth intervention session. 3. Subjective time exposed to environmental factors measured using the 'My Day' questionnaire daily across the 6-week study period, rate of change assessed at 1-week post-delivery of the fourth intervention session. 4. Environmental data regularity scores measured using the Button device weekly across the intervention period, compared to baseline. 5. Environmental data mean timing scores measured using the Button device weekly across the intervention period, compared to baseline. 6. Environmental data measured using the Button device continuously across the intervention period, compared to the last week of baseline. 7. Environmental exposure data measured using the Button device and 'My Day' diary across the intervention period, agreement assessed. 8. Insomnia symptom severity measured using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6, changes assessed at 2-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 9. Sleep quality (e.g., sleep latency, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset), sleep quantity (e.g., total sleep time), and circadian activity rhythms (e.g., inter-daily stability, intra-daily variability, M10, L5, and relative amplitude) measured using ActTrust 2 continuously across the 6-weeks, changes assessed at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. The Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD) will be used to collect self-report measures of sleep (including total sleep time, sleep latency, number of awakenings, length of awakenings, quality of sleep, sleep efficiency, naps, and length of naps). The Home Sleep Test REM (HST REM; SOMNOmedics GmbH, Randersacker, Germany) will be used to capture sleep EEG to look at sleep continuity, sleep architecture, and spectral density (relative and absolute). 10. Fatigue measured using the Flinders Fatigue Scale (FFS) at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6; changes assessed from baseline at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 11. Sleep hygiene behaviours measured using the Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6; changes from baseline assessed at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 12. “Biological” chronotype measured using the Ultra Short Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (µMCTQ) and the “psychological” chronotype measured using the Reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ) at the end of Week 2 and Week 6. Sleep timing will be assessed across the study period. We will assess changes in chronotype and sleep timing from the end of Week 2 to 4 weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 13. Anxiety symptoms measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7) at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6; changes from baseline assessed at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 14. Depressive symptoms measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6; changes from baseline assessed at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 15. Work productivity and activity impairment (absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment, and impairment in non-work-related activities) measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) at the end of Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6; changes from baseline assessed at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 16. Intensity of main exercise measured using the 'My Day' questionnaire self-reported throughout the study period; changes from baseline assessed at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 17. Improvements in insomnia symptoms, sleep and circadian rhythms, fatigue, chronotype, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and work productivity measured using previously stated validated tools. Changes in environmental exposure (the mediator) and outcomes will be assessed from baseline at 2 weeks and 4 weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 18. Sleep hygiene behaviours measured using the Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) at baseline and at 2-weeks and 4-weeks post initial delivery of the intervention. 19. Perceived credibility measured using the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) after delivery of the intervention materials (start of Week 3). 20. Acceptability of the study intervention and procedures measured using a follow-up interview with a subset of participants that is audio recorded after the final delivery of the intervention. 21. Barriers and facilitators recorded within each intervention session, measured during each intervention session (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and assessed per intervention session. 22. Environmental exposure measured using self-report at screening and objective environmental data at baseline. 23. Environmental data measured using satellite-based measurement at the end of the study. |
Overall study start date | 01/10/2023 |
Completion date | 18/01/2026 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 23 Years |
Upper age limit | 65 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 33 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Aged 23-65 years old 2. Currently employed (working for pay/stipend) and intend to remain employed over the next 4 months 3. An “office worker” (work sitting at a desk, indoors, for your working day) 4. Working within Oxford, full-time (“9-5”, Monday-Friday), over the next 4 months 5. Living within Oxford, full-time (Monday-Sunday), over the next 4 months 6. Insomnia symptoms (ISI; ≥11) 7. Low self-reported levels of environmental exposure 8. An iPhone (iOS 15 or later) smartphone user with a consistent internet connection indoors and outdoors 9. Able to read and understand English 10. Able to follow study procedures as laid out in the participant information sheet |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Severe anxiety symptoms (GAD-7; ≥15) 2. Severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9; ≥15) 3. Suicidal ideation/self-harm (PHQ-9 item 9; ≥1) 4. Diagnosis or being treated for a mental health disorder 5. Shift or night worker in the past 3 months 6. Diagnosis of the following sleep disorders: Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder, Central Disorder of Hypersomnolence, Circadian rhythm Sleep-Wake Disorder, Parasomnia, Sleep-Related Movement Disorder, Other 7. Currently being treated for the following sleep disorders: Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder, Central Disorder of Hypersomnolence, Circadian rhythm Sleep-Wake Disorder, Parasomnia, Sleep-Related Movement Disorder, Other 8. Sleep problem fully explained by caring responsibilities, being woken up by children, noises in your environment, a physical/surgical condition 9. Prescribed or “over the counter” sleep medication 10. Habitual smoker/vape user 11. Photosensitising medication 12. Underweight and obese BMI 13. Planning major surgery in the next 2 months 14. Neurological disorder 15. Serious head injury in the past year 16. Physical disability/health condition/pain preventing moderate exercise [e.g., 30-minute walk] 17. Eye disease 18. Photosensitivity 19. Lactating or pregnant 20. Active implanted stimulator [e.g., pacemaker] 21. Undergone light therapy in the last month/plan to have light therapy within the next 2 months 22. Currently receiving psychological therapy for sleep/plan to start within the next 2 months 23. Currently taking part in a study involving a drug or behavioural intervention/will be taking part in such a study in the next 2 months 24. Another member of your household has taken part in this study/is currently taking part in this study 25. Regularly cover up eyes outdoors for religious/moral reasons (e.g., burqa/burka) 26. Regularly cover up skin outdoors for religious/moral reasons (e.g., burqa/burka) 27. Taken a flight that crossed 3 or more time zones in the last 2-weeks/plan to take one in the next 2 months |
Date of first enrolment | 17/03/2025 |
Date of final enrolment | 18/11/2025 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Oxford
OX1 3QU
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
Research Services, University of Oxford, Boundary Brook House, Churchill Drive
University of Oxford Research Governance, Ethics & Assurance (RGEA) team at or on +44 (0)1865 616480.
Oxford
OX3 7GB
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1865 616480 |
---|---|
rgea.sponsor@admin.ox.ac.uk | |
Website | https://www.ox.ac.uk |
https://ror.org/052gg0110 |
Funders
Funder type
Not defined
Private sector organisation / Research institutes and centers
- Alternative name(s)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, OxBRC
- Location
- United Kingdom
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 18/07/2026 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
Publication and dissemination plan | The dissemination of this trial will be multifaceted. Initially, the trial protocol will be pre-registered on the Open Science Framework, subject to an embargo lifting upon the study's conclusion. The trial findings will be compiled into a DPhil (PhD) thesis. Once the study's results have been analysed, we plan to submit a paper for publication, roughly six months post-data collection. The results of the study will be shared irrespective of their magnitude or direction. |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Prof Simon Kyle (simon.kyle@ndcn.ox.ac.uk). |
Editorial Notes
12/03/2025: Study's existence confirmed by the University of Oxford’s Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee.