A comparison of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide as inhalation agents for dental sedation

ISRCTN ISRCTN54172738
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN54172738
Protocol serial number N0013122021
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
Funder Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
25/03/2020
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Carol Boyle
Scientific

Sedation & Special Care Dentistry
F26 Guy's Tower
Guy's Hospital
St Thomas Street
London
SE1 9RT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7188 7188
Email abc@email.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleA comparison of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide as inhalation agents for dental sedation
Study objectivesTo assess whether sevoflurane/oxygen is a suitable alternative to nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation in the treatment of anxious adult dental patients presenting to a sedation clinic in a dental hospital.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedOral Health: Anaesthesia/Sedation
InterventionThe level of patient's anxiety will be assessed then each patient will attend for two visits. On the first visit, patients will be given either nitrous oxide/oxygen or sevoflurane/oxygen, the choice being randomized. Patients will be given the alternative drug on the second visit. The operator will score the acceptability of sedation received. After a period of recovery, the patient will be asked to fill in a questionnaire about their experience of sedation.
Intervention typeDrug
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Sevoflurane and nitrous oxide
Primary outcome measure(s)The patient's vital signs will be recorded throughout the procedure and analysed and compared for the two sedative agents. This will give an indication of whether sevoflurane is a more acceptable agent for sedation both in terms of the operator and the patient.
Key secondary outcome measure(s)Not provided at time of registration
Completion date31/07/2003

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration25
Key inclusion criteria1. Adult who have some form of dental anxiety
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II
3. Can give valid consent.

Patients must be escorted by a responsible adult on the days of the sedation procedures.
Key exclusion criteria1 Pregnancy or possible pregnancy
2 Nursing mothers
3. Patients with heart conditions
4. History of allergy to sevoflurane or any related agents
Date of first enrolment01/04/2002
Date of final enrolment31/07/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Guy's Hospital
London
SE1 9RT
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

25/03/2020: No publications found, all search options exhausted, study status unverified.