Efficacy of short term versus long term chest tube drainage after talc slurry pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusions

ISRCTN ISRCTN55111743
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN55111743
Protocol serial number N0199104505
Sponsor Department of Health (UK)
Funder Royal Berkshire and Battle Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
12/01/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr CWH Davies
Scientific

Department of Respiratory Medicine
Royal Berkshire & Battle Hospitals NHS Trust
Abbey Block
Oxford Road
Reading
RG30 1AG
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)118 963 6282

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised open label trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesWhether hospital stay for pleurodesis with talc can be shortened by comparing 24 versus 72 h drainage whilst maintaining efficacy.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedRespiratory: Pleurodesis
Intervention24 versus 72 h drainage
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Response to pleurodesis
2. Clinical response
3. Length of hospital stay
4. Complications

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date30/04/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Key inclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment01/07/2001
Date of final enrolment30/04/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Department of Respiratory Medicine
Reading
RG30 1AG
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/10/2006 Yes No