A pilot study of continuous imatinib mesylate (IM) versus pulsed imatinib with or without lenograstim (recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor [rHu-GCSF]) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients who have achieved a complete cytogenetic response

ISRCTN ISRCTN56578157
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN56578157
EudraCT/CTIS number 2004-000179-33
Secondary identifying numbers LRF 03/101
Submission date
05/07/2004
Registration date
05/07/2004
Last edited
25/10/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/find-a-clinical-trial/a-trial-looking-at-different-ways-of-giving-glivec-to-people-with-cml

Contact information

Prof Tessa Holyoake
Scientific

Professor of Experimental Haematology
Director of the Paul O'Gorman Leukaemia Research Centre
Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow
21 Shelley Road
Gartnavel General Hospital
Glasgow
G12 0XB
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)141 301 7881
Email tlh1g@clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA pilot randomised controlled study of continuous imatinib mesylate (IM) versus pulsed imatinib with or without lenograstim (recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor [rHu-GCSF]) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients who have achieved a complete cytogenetic response
Study acronymGIMI
Study hypothesisContinuous imatinib mesylate (IM) versus pulsed imatinib with or without lenograstim (recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor [rHu-GCSF]) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients who have achieved a complete cytogenetic response.

This trial is also listed in the the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio: http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=1451
Ethics approval(s)Multicentre research ethics committee (MREC) Scotland approved on the 16th September 2004 (MREC ref: 04/MRE00/52)
ConditionChronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)
InterventionPatients who are in complete cytogenetic remission for at least 6 months subsequent to IM therapy will be randomised to receive either pulsed IM, pulsed IM with G-CSF, or continuous IM.

Total duration of treatment: 12 months
Total duration of follow-up: 4 years
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAdded 06/01/2010:
1. Safety of combination GCSF and imatinib
2. Safety of pulsed imatinib arms

Endpoints measured at end of last recruited patient 12 month treatment (September 2007) and then 4 years after this timepoint (September 2011).
Secondary outcome measuresAdded 06/01/2010:
1. Molecular response to imatinib interruption
2. Proportion of patients progressing

Endpoints measured at end of last recruited patient 12 month treatment (September 2007) and then 4 years after this timepoint (September 2011).
Overall study start date10/10/2004
Overall study end date10/10/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants45
Total final enrolment45
Participant inclusion criteria1. Aged greater than or equal to 18 years, either sex
2. Patients, who having been established on IM therapy at the appropriate licensed dose, have maintained a complete cytogenetic response for at least 6 months (confirmed on bone marrow [BM] performed within 3 months of study entry)
3. Patients who remain quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR) positive and have a peripheral blood (PB) Q-RT-PCR breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (BCR-ABL)/ABL ratio of less than 2% (within 4 weeks of study entry)
4. All chronic Phase patients, with criteria as follows:
4.1. Less than 10% blasts in peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM)
4.2. Less than 30% blasts plus promyelocytes in PB or BM
4.3. Less than 20% blasts in PB
5. Acute phase (AP) patients only if their definition of AP was based on karyotypic evolution on BM cytogenetics as an isolated feature of progression
6. Written voluntary informed consent
Participant exclusion criteria1. Patients with serum bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or creatinine concentration greater than 2 times the institutional upper limit of the normal range
2. Patients who have evidence of extramedullary disease
3. Treatment with investigational drugs within 28 days of study entry
4. Patients with uncontrolled medical disease such as diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, neuropsychiatric disorders, infection, angina or Grade 3 - 4 cardiac problems as defined by the New York Heart Association Criteria
5. Patients who have undergone major surgery within 4 weeks of study day 1, or who have not recovered from prior major surgery
6. Patients who are: pregnant, breast feeding, of childbearing potential without a negative pregnancy test prior to study entry or who are unwilling to use barrier contraception throughout the trial and for 3 months after cessation of therapy (postmenopausal women must be amenorrhoeic for at least 12 months to be considered of non-childbearing potential)
7. Patients with a history of non-compliance to medical regimens or who are considered potentially unreliable
Recruitment start date10/10/2004
Recruitment end date10/10/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Professor of Experimental Haematology
Glasgow
G12 0XB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Leukaemia Research Fund (UK)
Charity

43 Great Ormond Street
London
WC1N 3JJ
United Kingdom

Email sgerscher@lrf.org.uk
Website http://www.lrf.org.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0055acf80

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Leukaemia Research Fund (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/06/2009 Yes No
Plain English results 25/10/2022 No Yes

Editorial Notes

25/10/2022: Cancer Research UK plain English results link and total final enrolment added.