Towards rational prescribing of antibiotics for acute rhinosinusitis: evaluation of the impact and costs of implementation strategies based on a multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline

ISRCTN ISRCTN57375471
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57375471
Secondary identifying numbers F6/12 - AV - F 681
Submission date
18/03/2005
Registration date
25/07/2005
Last edited
15/04/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Marc De Meyere
Scientific

De Pintelaan 185 1K3
Ghent
B-9000
Belgium

Email marc.demeyere@ugent.be

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific title
Study objectivesIn Belgium consumption of antibiotics is among the highest in Europe. As a result antimicrobial resistance rates are alarming. Recently a number of evidence-based guidelines on rational use of antibiotics have been produced and disseminated by the scientific organisations in collaboration with the Belgian Co-ordinating Committee for Antibiotic Policy. International research has shown that merely distributing guidelines to professionals in the field does not lead to behaviour change. In Belgium several strategies for implementation of good clinical practice, i.e. local peer review groups and academic detailing, have been initiated. However, the (local) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these strategies has not been evaluated. This project will investigate the impact of each of the strategies separately and the combination of both strategies in general practice, following the publication of a guideline on the management of acute rhinosinusitis. This guideline aims at rationalizing (i.e. reducing) the prescription rate for this condition in primary care.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedImplementation of a practice guideline for acute rhinosinusitis in general practice
InterventionCluster randomised factorial trial with 4 study arms.
Interventions: academic detailing visits to individual GPs and/or group sessions of GPs on the key messages of the guideline.
Control: no specific intervention
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAntibiotic prescription rate, cost-effectiveness.
Secondary outcome measuresChoice of antibiotic, use of personalized non-drug prescriptions, clinical course of rhinosinusitis as reported in patient diaries.
Overall study start date01/07/2004
Completion date30/06/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants135 patient registrations are aimed for in each study arm
Key inclusion criteriaLocal peer review groups of general practitioners in Flanders, Belgium (approximately 10-20 GPs per group) are invited to participate.
Key exclusion criteriaGroups that have participated in the field testing of the guideline, groups that have been visited by academic detailers more than once in the past, groups located at >1 hour drive from the study centres.
Date of first enrolment01/07/2004
Date of final enrolment30/06/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Belgium

Study participating centre

De Pintelaan 185 1K3
Ghent
B-9000
Belgium

Sponsor information

Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders (Belgium)
Not defined

Egmontstraat 5
Brussels
B-1000
Belgium

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03qtxy027

Funders

Funder type

Government

Federal Belgian Ministry of Health and Fund for Scientific Research Flanders, Dossier nr. G.0617.05

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results: 01/06/2007 Yes No