Diagnostic accuracy of common imaging methods to recognise internal derangement and ligamental tears of the carpus

ISRCTN ISRCTN57744239
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57744239
Protocol serial number ACCORDS_V1.2_2007
Sponsor Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. (Germany)
Funder Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. (Germany)
Submission date
17/03/2009
Registration date
08/04/2009
Last edited
08/04/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Andreas Eisenschenk
Scientific

Dept of Hand-, Micro-, and Replantation Surgery
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin Trauma Centre
Berlin
12683
Germany

Email andreas.eisenschenk@ukb.de

Study information

Primary study designObservational
Study designProspective diagnostic accuracy (efficacy) observational cohort study
Secondary study designCohort study
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleAccuracy of common radiological methods to diagnose scapholunar dissociation: a prospective diagnostic efficacy study
Study acronymACCORDS
Study objectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of common imaging methods (i.e., conventional and functional radiography, arthrography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and MR-arthrography) for determining traumatic tears of the scapholunar (SL) ligament compared to the diagnostic gold standard of wrist arthroscopy.
Ethics approval(s)Charité University Medical Centre Ethics Committee gave approval on the 3rd September 2007 (ref: EA1/152/07)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTraumatic scapholunar (SL) dissociation
InterventionExperimental tests:
Routine radiological imaging procedures (i.e., plain radiographs, cineradiography, arthrography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance arthrography).

Reference standard:
Wrist arthroscopy.

Diagnostic test accuracy will be investigated. All imaging procedures will take no longer than one hour, and wrist arthroscopy no longer than two hours (depending on intra-operative findings and the need for surgical repair). The study-specific follow-up ends at hospital discharge, since all information necessary to answer the study questions will have been collected at this time.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)Diagnostic accuracy (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, areas under the receiving operating characteristics [AUC/ROC]) of all established imaging methods compared to the diagnostic reference standard (i.e., wrist arthroscopy). All outcomes will be assessed by the time of hospital discharge.
Key secondary outcome measure(s)Cost-effectiveness. All outcomes will be assessed by the time of hospital discharge.
Completion date01/01/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration230
Key inclusion criteria1. Male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years
2. Considered to require wrist arthroscopy due to:
2.1. Exposure to an injury to the wrist (i.e., hyperextension, contusion, extra-articular radial fractures) suitable to cause SL-tears
2.2. Persistent pain and/or other symptoms for greater than 4 weeks
Key exclusion criteria1. Pregnancy
2. Renal insufficiency
3. Known allergy to contrast media
4. Relative or absolute contraindication to MRI scanning
5. Previous operations to the affected wrist
6. Rheumatoid arthritis
7. Open fractures or other conditions deemed to require immediate surgical intervention
Date of first enrolment01/01/2009
Date of final enrolment01/01/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

Dept of Hand-, Micro-, and Replantation Surgery
Berlin
12683
Germany

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes