A randomised controlled trial of trans-anal versus trans-vaginal repair for symptomatic anterior rectocoele

ISRCTN ISRCTN58192664
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN58192664
Protocol serial number N0050166862
Sponsor Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health
Funder Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK) Own Account
Submission date
29/09/2006
Registration date
29/09/2006
Last edited
03/09/2013
Recruitment status
Stopped
Overall study status
Stopped
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Richard Baker
Scientific

Bradford Royal Infirmary
Duckworth Lane
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1274 452200
Email richard.p.baker@tinyonline.co.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesA rectocoele is a common problem caused by weakness in the tissues of the pelvis, which leads to problems with defecation. A number of surgical approaches to repair of a rectocoele are available. Currently in our institution a patient will have rectocoele repair either through the anus or through the vagina. No consensus of opinion exists as to which is the superior approach. The aim of this study is to randomise the patients to one or the other operation to establish which approach is superior.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUrological and Genital Diseases: Rectocoele
InterventionPatients will be selected from the clinics for suitability for surgical repair of their rectocoele following appropriate investigations. All patients will be assessed in a structure manner. A specific questionnaire will be filled in by the patient preoperatively. This questionnaire includes SF-36v2 global quality of life assessment tool, the Cleveland continence scoring toll and specific questions on defecation habits, and dyspareunia.

The presence of a symptomatic rectocele in the absence of other pathology renders the patient suitable for inclusion into the trial and after providing adequate information and fully informed consent they will be randomised to transanal or transvaginal repair. This would happen preoperatively to allow the patient to be counselled and consented about the exact procedure they will undergo.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Functional outcome and quality of life changes by the surgery.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date01/02/2006
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)Lack of funding/sponsorship

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target sample size at registration62
Key inclusion criteriaResearch participants will be recruited from the outpatient clinic once they have been identified by preoperative investigation to be suitable for surgical repair of their rectocoele. Inclusion criteria:
1. The presence of excessive straining, incomplete evacuation
2. The requirement for perineal/vaginal digital pressure during defecation
3. Vaginal bulging and constipation, due to a rectocoele as proven on defaecography, in the presence of a normal large bowel.
These are standard indications for rectocoele repair.

62 patients will be recruited in to the study from the department of Colorectal Surgery and Gynaecology, 31 patients will be in each arm.
Key exclusion criteriaPatients with a slow transit colon or sphincter defects as these patients have been shown not to benefit from rectocoele repair.
Date of first enrolment02/06/2005
Date of final enrolment01/02/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Bradford Royal Infirmary
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan