The feasibility of Whole Body Vibration in institutionalised elderly persons and its influence on muscle performance, balance and mobility: a randomised controlled trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN62535013
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN62535013
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
30/06/2005
Registration date
06/07/2005
Last edited
15/04/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Tony Mets
Scientific

Geriatric & Gerontology Department
Academic Hospital of the Free University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)
Laarbeeklaan 101
Brussels
B-1090
Belgium

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific title
Study objectivesWhole Body Vibration is feasible in institutionalised elderly persons and improves the mobility and muscle performance compared to control.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedInstitutionalised elderly persons
InterventionIntervention: A 6-week exercise program on a vertical vibration platform (Power-Plate, Badhoevedorp, The Netherlands), three times per week (with a minimum of 1-day rest in between) and consisting in 6 static exercises targeting lower limb muscles. The exercise volume and intensity being progressively increased according to the overload-principle.

Control: Exactly the same exercise program on the vibration platform as the intervention group, but without vertical vibration (the sound of the motor of the vibration platform being reproduced by a tape recorder during each bout of exercise).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureFeasibility: taking into account continuation of the exercise program and/or occurence of complications related to the Whole Body Vibration exercises.

Improvement due to the intervention: taking into account balance and gait (using the timed up-and-go test and Tinetti-test), upper limb and lower body flexibility (using the back scratch and chair sit-and-reach test), maximal grip strength (using a Martin vigorimeter device, Elmed, Addison, USA), closed chain bilateral leg extension (using a linear isokinetic multi-joint dynamometer, Aristokin®, Lode, Groningen, The Netherlands).
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/12/2003
Completion date15/12/2003

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participants24
Key inclusion criteriaAll residents of a nursing home (Van Zanden, Brussels, Belgium; capacity of 102 beds) within dependence categories O, A and B according to the scale of Katz et al. (1963) for basic activities of daily living.
Key exclusion criteriaMainly based on contra-indications for Whole Body Vibration: presence of infectious disease, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, endogenous osteosynthethical material, knee or hip prosthesis, pacemaker, epilepsy, musculo-skeletal disorders and cognitive or physical dysfunction interfering with test and training procedures.
Date of first enrolment01/12/2003
Date of final enrolment15/12/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Belgium

Study participating centre

Geriatric & Gerontology Department
Brussels
B-1090
Belgium

Sponsor information

Free University of Brussels (VUB) - Gerontology (Belgium)
University/education

Laarbeeklaan 103
Brussels
B-1090
Belgium

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/006e5kg04

Funders

Funder type

University/education

Free University of Brussels (VUB) - Gerontology

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results: 22/12/2005 Yes No