Is misoprostol a safe alternative to manual vacuum aspiration in women with incomplete abortions in developing countries?

ISRCTN ISRCTN65305620
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN65305620
Protocol serial number N/A
Sponsor Tanzanian German Program to Support Health (TGPSH) (Tanzania)
Funder Tanzanian German Program to Support Health (TGPSH) (Tanzania)
Submission date
01/02/2008
Registration date
22/02/2008
Last edited
22/02/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Regine Unkels
Scientific

PO box 228
Lindi
-
Tanzania

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designEvaluator-blinded, single-centre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleIs misoprostol a safe alternative to manual vacuum aspiration in women with early pregnancy failure in a low resource setting?: a randomized controlled trial
Study objectivesMisoprostol is just as effective as Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) in treatment of first trimester pregnancy failure, but is more acceptable to clients in a rural setting in low resource countries.
Ethics approval(s)The National Institute of Medical Research Dar es Salaam, approved on 18 October 2007 (ref: NIMR/HR/R.8a/Vol. IX/628)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedFirst trimester pregnancy failure
InterventionMisoprostol 600 microgram 3 doses (one dose every 4 hours) sublingually versus MVA
Intervention typeDrug
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)misoprostol
Primary outcome measure(s)

Ultrasonographic endometrium thickness at day 8

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

The following will be assessed at day 8:
1. Changes in hemoglobin (Hb) level
2. Side effects including pain
3. Adverse events
4. Patients satisfaction and acceptability

If any problem is observed on day 8, the patient will be reviewed again on day 15 (No review at day 15 if no problem is observed).

Completion date11/02/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target sample size at registration180
Key inclusion criteria1. History of passage of tissue and/or blood and >30 mm endometrial thickness on TransVaginal Sonography (TVS)
2. On TVS an anembryonic gestation or fetal death with an embryonic crown-rump length between 5 and 62 mm without cardiac activity (in case of a Crown-Rump Length [CRL] of 5-9 mm TVS will be repeated after one week to ensure absence of cardiac activity) or an anembryonic gestational sac of 16-45 mm (TVS will be repeated after one week to ensure growth of the gestational sac is <3 mm and exclude a viable pregnancy)
Key exclusion criteria1. On TVS present fetal heart activity, a crown-rump length >62 mm, molar pregnancy or a endometrial thickness less than or equal to 30 mm
2. Fundal height of more than halfway the umbilicus and the symphysis indicating a gestational age >12 weeks
3. Known allergy to prostaglandins
4. Heavy blood loss or a pulse rate of >120/min
5. Axillary temperature of > 38°C or signs of septic abortion such as pus draining from uterus
6. Ectopic pregnancy
Date of first enrolment11/02/2008
Date of final enrolment11/02/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Tanzania

Study participating centre

PO box 228
Lindi
-
Tanzania

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes