Effects of varenicline and cognitive bias modification on responses to smoking cues
ISRCTN | ISRCTN65690030 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN65690030 |
Secondary identifying numbers | UoB:1407 |
- Submission date
- 09/07/2012
- Registration date
- 30/01/2014
- Last edited
- 18/01/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Many smokers find quitting smoking extremely difficult and failure rates are high. It has been shown that cues associated with smoking (e.g., cigarette packets, smell of smoke) can lead to cigarette cravings. Also, smokers may find that their attention is drawn to smoking cues significantly more than other objects or cues in the environment. This capturing of attention by smoking-related cues is an example of what is known as a 'cognitive bias'. Cognitive biases for smoking cues may lead to increased craving for cigarettes and interfere with attempts to stop smoking. Given this link between cognitive bias and smoking, programmes aimed at reducing cognitive bias are considered promising targets for quitting smoking. Recent research indicates that it is possible to 'train' attention away from drug cues using a computer-based programme known as cognitive bias modification (CBM). Therefore in this study we propose to find out the impact of a CBM procedure on the brain's responses to smoking-related cues. Additionally, a licenced smoking cessation drug, varenicline, has also been proposed to change responses to smoking-related cues. Varenicline may therefore increase the effects of CBM on responses to smoking cues.
Who can participate?
The study will enrol regular daily smokers (at least 10 cigarettes or 15 roll-ups per day), who smoke within one hour of waking in the morning.
What does the study involve?
The participants will be randomly allocated to either a training group or a drug group. Participants in the drug group will be randomly allocated to receive either varenicline or a placebo (dummy) tablet. Participants in the training group will be randomly allocated to receive either CBM to induce cognitive bias away from smoking-related cues, CBM to induce cognitive bias towards smoking-related cues, or a treatment designed to induce no change in cognitive bias. They will undergo a brain scan to find out the responses to smoking-related cues and cognitive bias towards smoking-related cues. Cigarette craving and nicotine withdrawal will also be analysed.
What are the potential benefits and risks of participation?
Information we get from this study may help us to understand and treat cigarette smokers who have difficulty stopping in the future. The study medication (varenicline) is a licensed smoking cessation aid. It has been associated with some side effects. The more common side effects are fatigue, sleeplessness/abnormal dreams and vomiting, which may cause discomfort but are not considered dangerous or life-threatening.
Where will the study be run from?
The study will be run from Clinical Research and Imaging Centre (CRICBristol), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
When is the study starting and how long will it be expected to run for?
The study ran from August 2012 to February 2013.
Who is funding the study?
The study funded by Pfizer Inc. (UK).
Who is the main contact?
Dr Sally Adams
sally.adams@bristol.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
University of Bristol
School of Experimental Psychology
12A Priory Road
Bristol
BS8 1TU
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)117 954 6841 |
---|---|
marcus.munafo@bristol.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Other |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Patient information can be found at: http://www.bris.ac.uk/expsych/research/brain/targ/participants/cbmsally.html |
Scientific title | Effects of varenicline and cognitive bias modification on neural response to smoking-related cues |
Study objectives | 1. We hypothesise that experimental procedures designed to induce cognitive bias towards smoking-relates cues will lead to an increase in neural response to smoking-related cues, in brain regions previously implicated in cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. 2. We hypothesise that experimental procedures designed to induce cognitive bias away from smoking-relates cues will lead to a decrease in neural response to smoking-related cues, in brain regions previously implicated in cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. 3. We hypothesise that experimental procedures designed to induce cognitive bias away from smoking-relates cues will lead to a decrease in cognitive bias from pre-training to post-training. 4. We hypothesise that experimental procedures designed to induce cognitive bias towards smoking-relates cues will lead to an increase in cognitive bias from pre-training to post-training 5. We hypothesise that changes in the neural response to smoking-related cues relative to neutral cues, and changes in attentional bias, will be greatest in those trained to attend away from smoking-related cues and treated with varenicline. |
Ethics approval(s) | NRES Committee Brent, London, 07/02/2012, ref: 11/LO/1726 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Smoking cessation |
Intervention | Participants are randomised to the training group or the drug group Drug group: Participants would receive either varenicline or placebo in tablet form. Varenicline would be taken as 0.5 mg once daily for days 1-3, and 0.5 mg twice daily for days 4-6, and 0.5 mg once daily for day 7, consistent with standard dosing regimen for smoking cessation. All outcome measures would be assessed on day 7. Training group: Participants are randomised to three groups: 1. An experimental condition designed to induce cognitive bias away from smoking-related cues 2. An experimental condition designed to induce cognitive bias towards smoking-related cues 3. A control condition designed to induce no change in cognitive bias |
Intervention type | Drug |
Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
Phase | Not Applicable |
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Varenicline |
Primary outcome measure | 1. Neural responses to smoking-related cues 2. Cognitive bias |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Questionnaire of Smoking Urges 2. Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS) |
Overall study start date | 23/07/2012 |
Completion date | 28/02/2013 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 72 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Smokes > 10 manufactured cigarettes or > 15 roll up cigarettes per day 2. Smokes within one hour of waking 3. Aged between 18 and 40 years 4. Able to attend all of the study session 5. English as first language or equivalent level of fluency |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Female volunteers who are pregnant or breast feeding 2. Female volunteers not using adequate contraception 3. Volunteers who do not currently have a GP 4. Current or previous substance or alcohol misuse or dependence [other than nicotine] 5. Alcohol use in excess of 35 Units/week if female or 50 Units/week if male 6. Caffeine use ≥ 8 cups per day 7. Significant current or past psychiatric illness (Axis 1 or 2 psychiatric diagnoses) as diagnosed by a psychiatrist 8. Clinically significant abnormality including cardiology risk factors and history of arrhythmia (as assessed by self-report) 9. Ongoing use of medication (i.e. intake of any medication within 8 weeks of study, with exception of local treatment and occasional paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, e.g., aspirin or ibuprofen) 10. Smokers actively trying to give up smoking during the study period 11. Uncorrected visual impairment (including colour-blindness) 12. Uncorrected auditory impairment 13. Condition that makes MRI scanning unsafe (e.g. metallic implants; history of metal-working) 14. Unable to tolerate scanning environment (as established during a short anatomical MRI scan on day 0) 15. Hypersensitivity to Champix |
Date of first enrolment | 23/07/2012 |
Date of final enrolment | 28/02/2013 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
BS8 1TU
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Not defined
Research and Enterprise Development
3rd Floor, Senate House
Tyndall Avenue
Bristol
BS8 1TH
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)117 928 8676 |
---|---|
Red-Office@bristol.ac.uk | |
Website | http://www.bris.ac.uk/red/ |
https://ror.org/0524sp257 |
Funders
Funder type
Industry
Government organisation / For-profit companies (industry)
- Alternative name(s)
- Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Consumer Healthcare, Davis, Charles Pfizer & Company, Warner-Lambert, King Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Seagen
- Location
- United States of America
Government organisation / Universities (academic only)
- Alternative name(s)
- Universitas Bristolliensis, bristoluniversity, bristoluni
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol article | protocol | 07/10/2014 | Yes | No | |
Results article | results | 07/10/2014 | 18/01/2019 | Yes | No |
HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No |
Editorial Notes
18/01/2019: Publication reference added
14/11/2018: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.