Examining the impact of food processing level and nutritional composition on energy intake

ISRCTN ISRCTN67466216
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN67466216
Sponsor University of Liverpool
Funder Economic and Social Research Council
Submission date
23/09/2026
Registration date
29/09/2026
Last edited
30/09/2026
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
The study is designed to examine the effect that different types of diet have on the amount of energy we consume each day. In particular, the study examines whether diets that are higher in ‘ultra-processed food’ result in us eating more than similar diets which are (or are not) matched to the ultra-processed diet for nutritional factors like fat, salt and sugar. The study is happening because research suggests ‘ultra-processed’ food may increase the amount of energy consumed per day, but at present it is unclear whether this is due to the typical nutritional profile of ultra-processed foods.

Who can participate?
Healthy adults aged 18-64 years can take part. For more detailed inclusion and eligibility criteria see other sections.

What does the study involve?
It is important to note that this study will require attending the University of Liverpool several times a day for three 4-day periods of Mondays to Thursdays. The study will involve being provided with breakfast, lunch and dinner to be consumed in our laboratory from Monday to Thursday for 3 weeks. You will also be provided with snacks to take away and consume during these days. If you are interested in the study, we can provide you with a detailed participant information sheet.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no major anticipated risks. The presented foods will be commonly consumed in the UK and prepared adhering to Good Manufacturing Practice with appropriate risk analysis by individuals with a Level 2 Certificate in Food Safety and Hygiene. Because the study requires food consumption, we ask any potential participants with a food allergy not to participate. There are no intended benefits of taking part other than helping us develop a better understanding of diet and eating behaviour. If you complete all aspects of the study (three testing periods and relevant tasks) you will be reimbursed £300 for your participation in the form of a bank transfer (please note this can take up to 5 weeks).

Where is the study run from?
University of Liverpool (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2026 to September 2027

Who is funding the study?
The Economic and Social Research Council (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Victoria Norton (V.L.Norton@liverpool.ac.uk) or if unavailable, Prof Eric Robinson (eric.robinson@liv.ac.uk)

Contact information

Prof Eric Robinson
Principal investigator

Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool
Liverpool
L69 7ZA
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)151 794 1187
Email eric.robinson@liv.ac.uk
Dr Victoria Norton
Scientific

Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool
Liverpool
L69 7ZA
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)151 794 1187
Email V.L.Norton@liverpool.ac.uk
Dr Victoria Norton
Public

Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool
Liverpool
L69 7ZA
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1517941187
Email V.L.Norton@liverpool.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingBlinded (masking used)
ControlActive
AssignmentCrossover
PurposeBasic science
Scientific titleExamining the impact of food processing level and nutritional composition on energy intake: a randomised controlled trial
Study objectives The primary objective will compare the effects of an ultra-processed food (UPF) diet vs less processed food (LPF) diets that are either less energy dense than the UPF diet ('unmatched') or a similar energy density and nutritional profile ('matched') diets on daily energy intake (ad libitum) over 4 days.

The secondary objective is to explore changes in appetite sensations (hunger, fullness, and thirst) between UPF and LPF diets.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 07/07/2026, University of Liverpool, Central University Research Ethics Committee D (University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, United Kingdom; +44 (0)151 794 2000; ethics@liverpool.ac.uk), ref: 18294, 'Effects of diet on health'

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedEffect of different dietary formulations on dietary intake (daily energy intake)
InterventionParticipants will receive each diet for 4 days with a 1-week washout period in between to minimise carry-over effects. Cohorts of participants will be randomly allocated within a block-based design (five blocks with six diet orders: ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CAB, CBA) using a computer-generated sequence (RANDBETWEEN function, Microsoft Excel, version 16.106).

The three diet arms will be presented ad-libitum (breakfast, lunch, dinner, snacks) to participants.
1. UPF diet: comprising of UPF purchased food or meal (Nova: group four) commonly consumed in the UK diet – example: a supermarket lasagne ready meal.
2. Unmatched LPF diet: a less processed (Nova: group one to three) homemade version of the selected UPF with lower energy density (<0.50 kcal/g) compared to the UPF – example: a lasagne made using a recipe adapted from diet three (e.g., more vegetables, less pasta without any UPF ingredients).
3. Matched LPF diet: a less processed (Nova: group one to three) homemade version of the selected UPF with equivalent nutritional composition [meal-level per 100g] (key nutrients [including energy, fat, carbohydrates, fibre, protein and salt]: <10% and energy density: <5% ) – example: a lasagne made by manipulating ingredients in the unmatched LPF version to increase energy density and fat content to match the UPF version.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Energy intake measured using weight (pre-post consumption) of all meals and snacks from food boxes (grams) converted to energy intake (kcal): food consumed (grams) x energy density (kcal/g) (informed from pre-determined nutrition composition and relevant software) at daily (average) over 4-day testing period for each diet
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. Self-reported appetite sensations (e.g., hunger, fullness) measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) at pre-post each meal consumed in the laboratory over 4-day testing period for each diet
Completion date12/09/2027

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit64 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration18
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 18 to 64 years
2. Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m2
3. Read and speak English fluently
4. Willing to travel to the University of Liverpool
Key exclusion criteria1. Dislike and/or not willing to consume study meals (reviewed during in-person screening and rate dislike [<4] on 9-point hedonic scale for any meal components)
2. Food allergies, intolerances or dietary requirements which cannot be adhered to due to study foods
3. Chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, cancer, gastrointestinal disorders, kidney/liver disease, etc), poor oral health (including difficulties with eating/swallowing) or cognition impairments impacting memory (such as dementia)
4. History or current eating disorders and/or restrictive eating (including for religious reasons)
5. Following a weight-loss diet and/or not weight stable (5% change in past 3 months)
6. Current or recent smoker (including any tobacco, e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapy use in the past 3 months)
7. Pregnant or breastfeeding
8. Not regularly consuming three meals per day
9. Medication impacting study outcomes (including appetite, food intake, body weight, taste)
10. Unwilling to avoid drinking excessive amounts of alcohol (e.g., more than 14 units) per week during the three 4-day testing periods
11. Unwilling to refrain from too much strenuous exercise (e.g., >4 hours per week – that requires you to breathe hard and fast) during three 4-day testing periods and/or not follow an exercise routine similar to their habitual exercise habits during active study weeks
12. Participating in another research study involving food or alcohol consumption
13. Unable (or unwilling) to adhere to study requirements
14. Habitual intake considered implausible (24-hour recall)
Date of first enrolment12/10/2026
Date of final enrolment01/08/2027

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

University of Liverpool
Kissileff Laboratory, Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA
Liverpool
L69 7ZA
England

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study will be stored in a publicly available repository. We anticipate sharing data via Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/). Data shared will be participant level information on intervention allocation, outcome data and measured participant demographics. Data will be anonymised and participants agree to this when consenting into the study. The data will be stored in this repository indefinitely on final submission of the research study to a journal for publication.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file 23/09/2026 23/09/2026 No No
Statistical Analysis Plan 30/09/2026 No No

Additional files

50341_Protocol_23Sep2026.pdf
Protocol file
ISRCTN67466216 SAP.pdf
Statistical Analysis Plan

Editorial Notes

30/09/2026: The statistical analysis plan was uploaded as an additional file.
23/09/2026: Study's existence confirmed by the University of Liverpool, Central University Research Ethics Committee D.