Cost-effectiveness of physical training for self-employed persons with musculoskeletal disorders: the FysiOke study

ISRCTN ISRCTN67766245
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN67766245
Secondary identifying numbers NTR67
Submission date
12/09/2005
Registration date
12/09/2005
Last edited
30/06/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Ms Judith Heinrich
Scientific

TNO Quality of Life
P.O. Box 718
Hoofddorp
2130 AS
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)23 55499922
Email judith.heinrich@tno.nl

Study information

Study designRandomised active controlled parallel group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study acronymFysiOke
Study objectivesTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of physical training in the reduction of musculoskeletal disorders and disability. Both the insurance company and the Dutch government wants to know if this physical training is more cost-effective than usual care. Therefore, we started a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 300 self-employed persons with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).
Ethics approval(s)Medical Ethics Committee approved
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
Intervention1. Physical training
2. Usual care

Participants in the intervention group will receive physical training by a physiotherapist. This tailored training takes place two or three times a week during three months and consists of cardiovascular training, strengthening, relaxation and posture exercises. During an intake meeting each participant is screened for medical or physical contraindications and aspects of motivation. Participants in the control group will receive usual care mostly by general practitioner or physiotherapist (or no treatment at all).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Disability
2. Return to work

These outcomes are measured at baseline and 6 and 12 months follow-up. The required information becomes available by registration of the insurance company.
Secondary outcome measures1. Level of pain
2. Functional restrictions

These outcomes are also measured at baseline and 6 and 12 months follow-up. The required information is gathered by self-report of participants through questionnaires.
Overall study start date01/07/2004
Completion date31/12/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants300
Key inclusion criteriaAll insured persons submitting a new disability payment because of musculoskeletal disorders and who are eligible for physical training according to standard procedures of Interpolis.
Key exclusion criteriaInsured persons with musculoskeletal disorders indicating a specific treatment, e.g. an operation (for a slipped disk) or an injection (for an inflammation).
Date of first enrolment01/07/2004
Date of final enrolment31/12/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

TNO Quality of Life
Hoofddorp
2130 AS
Netherlands

Sponsor information

TNO Quality of Life (The Netherlands)
Research organisation

P.O. Box 718
Hoofddorp
2130 AS
Netherlands

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01bnjb948

Funders

Funder type

Government

Interpolis (a Dutch insurance company) (The Netherlands)

No information available

The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports (The Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 23/06/2009 Yes No