A comparison of once- and twice-weekly eccentric training on muscular health of older adults

ISRCTN ISRCTN68730580
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN68730580
Secondary identifying numbers IRAS 339894
Submission date
19/01/2024
Registration date
24/01/2024
Last edited
02/05/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Currently, the Chief Medical Officers in the United Kingdom recommend that older adults partake in strength or balance training twice per week to improve muscular function. However, adherence to these recommendations is low with time and physical capacity being reported as two barriers to meeting these guidelines. Eccentric resistance training (lengthening of the muscle whilst contracting) results in greater muscular adaptations than traditional resistance and requires a lower metabolic demand, therefore fewer weekly sessions may be required and they should be easier to tolerate, even for those with pre-existing comorbidities. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of once-weekly eccentric resistance training to twice-weekly resistance training on muscular structure and function in healthy older adults.

Who can participate?
Community-dwelling older adults (aged 60 years and over) who can ambulate independently, do not suffer from any musculoskeletal or neuromuscular diseases, and are not taking any medication that may affect muscular function or balance

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of three groups. The non-active control group maintained normal living conditions whereas the two training groups performed multi-joint isokinetic eccentric exercise for 12 weeks at 50% of their maximum eccentric strength. The once-weekly training group trained once per week and the twice-weekly training group trained twice per week; training volume was not matched between groups. The training lasted for 7 minutes in week 1 and progressed to 12 minutes in week 4, which remained the same hereafter until the training programme was completed in week 12. Participants were assessed at baseline, mid-training (week 7) and post-training (week 13).

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Possible benefits are improvements in muscle strength, power, and size, whereas possible risks are muscle fatigue and temporary exercise-induced muscle damage.

Where is the study run from?
University of Northampton Health and Performance Laboratory (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
November 2018 to March 2021

Who is funding the study?
Wellcome Trust (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Mr Brett Baxter, brett.baxter@northampton.ac.uk

Contact information

Mr Brett Baxter
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator

Waterside Campus
University Drive
Northampton
NN1 5PH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-7479-3985
Phone +44 (0)1604 892293
Email brett.baxter@northampton.ac.uk

Study information

Study designParallel randomized controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Laboratory
Study typeEfficacy
Participant information sheet 44910_PIS.pdf
Scientific titleEffects of once- versus twice-weekly eccentric resistance training on muscle structure and function in older adults
Study acronymG1XG2XECC
Study objectives1. Both eccentric resistance training groups (once- and twice-weekly) would alter muscle structure and function
2. The twice-weekly training group would alter muscle structure and function to a greater extent than the once-weekly group
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 11/12/2018, University of Northampton Research Ethics Committee (Faculty of Art, Science, and Technology, Waterside Campus, University Drive, Northampton, NN1 5PH, United Kingdom; +44 (0)1604892523; Merryn.Ekberg@Northampton.ac.uk), ref: ETH1819-0053

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedImproving neuromuscular structure and function in healthy older adults
InterventionParallel randomisation was performed using a random number generator online. The non-active control group maintained normal living conditions whereas the two training groups performed multi-joint isokinetic eccentric exercise for 12 weeks at 50% of their maximum eccentric strength. The once-weekly training group trained once per week and the twice-weekly training group trained twice per week; training volume was not matched between groups. The training lasted for 7 minutes in week 1 and progressed to 12 minutes in week 4, which remained the same hereafter until the training programme was completed in week 12. Participants were assessed at baseline, mid-training (week 7) and post-training (week 13).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureLower-limb muscular strength measured via dynamometry at baseline, mid-training (week 7) and post-training (week 13)
Secondary outcome measures1. Lower-limb muscular power measured using the 10-repetition sit-to-stand test at baseline, mid-training (week 7) and post-training (week 13)
2. Vastus lateralis muscle thickness measured using B-mode ultrasonography at baseline, mid-training (week 7) and post-training (week 13)
Overall study start date23/11/2018
Completion date26/03/2021

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Healthy volunteer
Age groupSenior
Lower age limit60 Years
Upper age limit100 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants24
Total final enrolment42
Key inclusion criteria1. ≥60 years of age
2. Able to independently ambulate without walking aids
3. Free from any illnesses and/or medication that affected the neuromuscular system or balance
4. Not currently involved in a structured exercise programme
Key exclusion criteria1. <60 years of age
2. Enrolled in a resistance training programme
3. Diagnosed with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disease that affects balance and/or strength
4. On medication that affects neuromuscular or musculoskeletal health
Date of first enrolment29/04/2019
Date of final enrolment31/05/2019

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

University of Northampton
University Drive
Northampton
NN1 5PH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Northampton
University/education

Waterside Campus
University Drive
Northampton
NN1 5PH
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1604892577
Email Tony.Kay@Northampton.ac.uk
Website http://www.northampton.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04jp2hx10

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Wellcome Trust
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
Wellcome, WT
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/03/2024
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryStored in publicly available repository
Publication and dissemination planThe project has been presented at European College of Sport Science 2023, Paris, and the project is intended to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are stored in a publicly available repository
The name of the repository: PURE
A persistent weblink to the dataset: https://doi.org/10.24339/3373b688-e811-4847-9f38-ccf09a9c843a
The type of data stored: objective discrete data
The process for requesting access (if non-publicly available): N/A
Dates of availability: N/A
Whether consent from participants was required and obtained: yes
Comments on data anonymization: data are anonymised using participant ID numbers
Any ethical or legal restrictions: no

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Dataset 16/10/2023 19/01/2024 No No
Participant information sheet 19/01/2024 No Yes
Results article 26/04/2024 02/05/2024 Yes No

Additional files

44910_PIS.pdf

Editorial Notes

02/05/2024: Publication reference added.
19/01/2024: Study's existence confirmed by the University of Northampton Research Ethics Committee.