Extended reality-based feedback training for improving sprint technique in track athletes

ISRCTN ISRCTN69962905
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN69962905
Sponsor Kangwon National University
Funder Investigator initiated and funded
Submission date
19/06/2026
Registration date
19/06/2026
Last edited
19/06/2026
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Sprint performance depends on small differences in running technique, force application, and movement coordination. Coaches often use verbal instructions or video feedback to help athletes improve their technique, but this feedback is usually delayed and may not allow athletes to correct their movements immediately. Extended reality (XR) technology may allow athletes to receive real-time visual, vibration-based, and sound-based feedback during training. This study aims to assess whether an XR-based multisensory feedback training system can improve sprint technique and sprint performance in healthy national-level track athletes compared with video feedback or conventional sprint training.

Who can participate?
Healthy national-level track and field sprint athletes aged 18 to 25 years

What does the study involve?
Thirty sprinters are randomly assigned to one of three groups: an XR-based multisensory feedback group, a video feedback group, or a conventional training control group. All groups complete a 12-week sprint training programme with three 60-minute sessions per week, followed by a 4-week retention assessment period. The XR feedback group receives real-time feedback using an XR headset, a vibration belt, and sound cues during part of each training session. The video feedback group receives delayed video playback and verbal technical feedback. The control group continues conventional sprint training with general coaching encouragement. Sprint performance, movement technique, force production, muscle coordination, brain activity measures, and perceived workload are assessed at different timepoints during the study.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from structured sprint training and feedback that could help improve their sprint technique and performance. The possible risks are similar to those associated with normal sprint training, such as muscle soreness, fatigue, falls, or musculoskeletal injury. Additional minor risks may include discomfort from wearing the XR headset, sensors, headphones, or vibration belt. To reduce these risks, participants are screened before taking part, training sessions are supervised, feedback trials are performed at submaximal intensity where appropriate, and participants can stop taking part at any time.

Where is the study run from?
Chizhou University (China)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2025 to August 2025

Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded

Who is the main contact?
Dr Gang Qin, qingang@hanyang.ac.kr

Contact information

Dr Gang Qin
Scientific, Public, Principal investigator

School of Physical Education, Hanyang University
Seoul Campus
04763
Korea, South

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0009-0000-4147-2870
Phone +86 (0)1056135210
Email qingang@hanyang.ac.kr

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingBlinded (masking used)
ControlActive
AssignmentParallel
PurposeTreatment
Scientific titleAn extended reality-based multisensory feedback system for real-time sprint technique optimization in track athletes: a randomized controlled trial
Study acronymXR-Sprint
Study objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a 12-week extended reality (XR)-based multisensory feedback training intervention improves sprint performance, biomechanical efficiency, neuromuscular coordination, and neural efficiency in healthy national-level sprinters compared with video-based feedback and conventional training.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 18/04/2025, Ethics Committee of the School of Physical Education, Chizhou University (School of Physical Education, Chizhou University, No. 199 Muzhi Road, Guichi District, Chizhou, 247000, China; +86 (0)566 274 8895; zsb@czu.edu.cn), ref: CZ20250411

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSprint technique optimization, sprint performance enhancement, and neuromuscular coordination in healthy national-level sprinters
InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups: an XR-based multisensory feedback group, a video feedback group, or a conventional training control group. Randomisation was performed using a computer-generated random sequence and was stratified by sex to ensure balanced allocation of male and female athletes across the three groups.

All groups completed a 12-week sprint training programme with three 60-minute sessions per week, followed by a 4-week retention period. The XR-based feedback group received 20 minutes per session of real-time multisensory feedback using an XR head-mounted display, vibrotactile belt, and auditory rhythm cues, in addition to 40 minutes of conventional sprint training. The video feedback group received 20 minutes per session of delayed video playback and verbal technical feedback, in addition to 40 minutes of conventional sprint training. The control group completed 60 minutes per session of conventional sprint training with general coaching encouragement only. Training volume, sprint intensity, number of trials, and rest intervals were matched across groups.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. 30-m sprint time measured using a Brower TC-Gates photocell timing system placed at 0, 10, 20 and 30 m, at baseline, week 6, week 12, and week 16 retention assessment
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
Completion date10/08/2025

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit25 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration30
Total final enrolment30
Key inclusion criteria1. National-level track and field sprint athletes aged 18–25 years
2. At least 3 years of systematic sprint training experience
3. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing
4. No history of neurological disorders or vestibular dysfunction
5. No musculoskeletal injuries within the preceding 6 months
Key exclusion criteria1. Contraindications to wearing head-mounted devices
2. Unable to complete the full 16-week study protocol
3. History of neurological disorders or vestibular dysfunction
4. Musculoskeletal injuries within the preceding 6 months
5. Uncorrected vision or hearing problems
Date of first enrolment20/04/2025
Date of final enrolment30/04/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • China

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Editorial Notes

19/06/2026: Study's existence confirmed by the Academic Committee of the School of Physical Education, Chizhou University.