Functional strength training to improve walking and upper limb function in stroke patients

ISRCTN ISRCTN71632550
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN71632550
Protocol serial number TSA 2008/08
Sponsor The Stroke Association (UK)
Funder The Stroke Association (UK) (ref: TSA 2008/08)
Submission date
12/01/2009
Registration date
30/01/2009
Last edited
15/08/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Jane Cross
Scientific

School AHP
University of East Anglia
Norwich
NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom

Email j.cross@uea.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised placebo-controlled observer-blind phase II trial with embedded qualitative investigation
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleFunctional strength training to improve walking and upper limb function in people at least one year after stroke: a phase II trial
Study objectivesThe hypothesis is that providing functional strength training (FST) to people who are at least one year after stroke will improve motor function and ability to perform everyday functional activity. The first step towards testing this hypothesis in a definitive phase III clinical trial is to address the following questions:
1. Is there sufficient efficacy to justify subsequent trials of FST for upper and lower limb motor recovery in people at least one year after stroke?
2. Is FST delivered in the community acceptable to stroke survivors one year and more after stroke?
3. What is the probable recruitment rate to a subsequent phase III trial?
4. What sample size is needed for subsequent phase III trial (effect size, attrition rate, response variation)?
5. What cost-effectiveness data should be collected in subsequent trials?
Ethics approval(s)Norfolk Ethics Committee – approval pending as of 12/01/2009
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedStroke
InterventionFunctional strength training is ‘hands-off’ progressive resistive exercise during functional activity whilst directing participants’ attention to the activity being performed and providing appropriate verbal feedback to enhance knowledge of performance. FST is designed to increase ability to produce voluntary muscle force throughout joint range, increase ability to modulate force in muscles/muscle groups appropriate for the activity being trained and improve functional ability. Activities are progressed by increasing the number of repetitions, increasing range of joint motion required and increasing the load to be moved. Intervention will be provided by a Research Physiotherapist for 1 hour/day, 4 days/week. Portable equipment (e.g. free weights and steppers) will be used as appropriate. Participants will be encouraged to use the paretic limb (upper or lower as allocated) in everyday functional activity. Standardised treatment schedules will be used (as in our earlier trials) to record the amount and type of intervention provided (compliance).

FSTLL will focus on functional activities e.g. sit-to-stand using body weight as resistance and progressively lowering the height of the supporting surface as participants improve. Equipment such as portable steppers will be used as appropriate but only with physiotherapy supervision for safety reasons.

FSTUL will focus on reaching for, retrieval of and manipulation (use) of everyday objects for activities such as pouring water from a jug, opening jars and lacing a shoe.

Both treatment schedules will include resistive exercise to strengthen specific muscles/muscle groups where weakness is hampering functional activity. The scientific papers describing these treatment schedules are currently in preparation.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Functional Ambulatory Category for lower limb function
2. Action Research Arm Test for upper limb function

All measured on days 43 and 88.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Modified Rivermead Mobility Index for lower limb function
2. Nine Hole Peg Test for upper limb function

All measured on days 43 and 88.

Completion date01/03/2012

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration58
Key inclusion criteria1. Adults aged 18 years and above, either sex, one to five years after stroke in anterior circulation (infarct or haemorrhage) not receiving formal therapy for their upper or lower limb
2. Have a walking ability on the Functional Ambulatory Category between 1 and 49 and have some voluntary activity in the paretic upper limb scoring 12+/57 on the Action Research Arm Test but unable to complete the Nine Hole Peg Test in 50 seconds or less
3. Can follow a one-stage command, i.e. sufficient communication/orientation for interventions in this trial
Key exclusion criteriaKnown pathology precluding them participating in functional strength training
Date of first enrolment01/03/2009
Date of final enrolment01/03/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

School AHP
Norwich
NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 12/08/2014 Yes No
Protocol article protocol 01/07/2013 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes