Postoperative recovery of carpal tunnel release comparing three surgical techniques: ultrasound-guided, endoscopic, and mini-open
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN73622579 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN73622579 |
| Sponsor | VZW AZ Maria Middelares hospital |
| Funder | Investigator initiated and funded |
- Submission date
- 13/01/2026
- Registration date
- 14/01/2026
- Last edited
- 14/01/2026
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Plain English summary of protocol not provided at time of registration.
Contact information
Dr Michiel Cromheecke
Principal investigator, Scientific, Public
Principal investigator, Scientific, Public
Buitenring-Sint-Denijs 30
9000
Gent
Belgium
| Phone | +32498855836 |
|---|---|
| michiel.cromheecke@gmail.com |
Study information
| Primary study design | Observational |
|---|---|
| Observational study design | Cohort study |
| Scientific title | Recovery profiles after carpal tunnel release: a prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided, endoscopic, and mini-open techniques |
| Study acronym | RECOVER-CTR |
| Study objectives | Existing comparative studies have mainly compared open and endoscopic releases, with high-quality data lacking for evaluation of the ultrasound-guided technique. Therefore, there is a need for prospective comparative research assessing functional outcomes and safety across all three techniques. We hypothesize that the ultrasound-guided technique might provide faster functional recovery, due to the minimally invasive aspect of the technique, while maintaining equal safety. |
| Ethics approval(s) |
Approved 14/07/2025, Ethical Committee AZ Maria Middelares - AZ Sint Vincentius Deinze (Buitenring-Sint-Denijs 30, Gent, 9000, Belgium; +3292464646; ethisch.comite@mijnziekenhuis.be), ref: MMS.2025.027 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Carpal tunnel syndrome |
| Intervention | Patients will be followed prospectively using standardized questionnaires and clinical examinations at the following postoperative time points: 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Clinical follow-up will be performed preoperatively, at 4 weeks, and at 3 months. Outcomes will be measured by Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), QuickDASH, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) . Statistical analysis will be performed on anonymized data using IBM® SPSS® Statistics. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant except where multiplicity adjustments are needed. Descriptive and comparative analyses will be performed. All primary analyses will follow an intention-to-treat (ITT) principle: patients analysed in the group corresponding to the technique performed. A per-protocol analysis will be performed as sensitivity analysis. Power calculation and sample size rationale for the primary outcome (BCTQ-SSS change at 4 weeks) was performed. We plan a pragmatic, prospective, 3-arm study with equal allocation to mini-open, endoscopic and ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release. Using the literature-derived Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the BCTQ Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) of 0.64 points, a total of 32 patients per group would be needed for pairwise comparisons (two-sample t-tests) to obtain 80% power at α = 0.05. Considering a 10% drop-out and aiming to increase the reliability of our findings we will aim for 50 patients per group. ANCOVA test will be used to include baseline differences. Since ANCOVA typically increases power the above power calculation should be sufficient. To address potential confounding due to non-randomized treatment assignment multivariate regression models will adjust for baseline characteristics such as age, sex, symptom duration, hand dominance, diabetes, severity scores, occupation (manual vs administrative). Propensity score matching or weighting may be performed as sensitivity analysis if group imbalance occurs. Results will include estimates, 95% CIs and exact p-values. We will follow STROBE guidelines for observational cohort reporting and provide a flowchart of included/excluded patients. |
| Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
|
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
|
| Completion date | 31/12/2026 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | |
|---|---|
| Age group | Mixed |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Upper age limit | 99 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 150 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Age between 18 years and 99 years 2. Receiving surgical treatment for solitary carpal tunnel syndrome 3. Preoperative availability of EMG and/or ultrasound |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Concomitant surgical procedures in the same hand 2. Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hand or wrist 4. Pregnancy 5. Dupuytren's disease with symptomatic MCP or PIP contracture 6. Bilateral carpal tunnel surgery within a 3-month interval 7. Symptomatic (poly)neuropathy confirmed by EMG 8. Active chemotherapy or malignancy 9. Cervical stenosis or herniation with electromyography (EMG) confirmation |
| Date of first enrolment | 15/07/2025 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/06/2026 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Belgium
Study participating centre
VZW AZ Maria Middelares hospital
Buitenring-Sint-Denijs 30
Gent
9000
Belgium
Gent
9000
Belgium
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Data sharing statement to be made available at a later date |
| IPD sharing plan |
Editorial Notes
14/01/2026: Study’s existence confirmed by the Ethical Committee AZ Maria Middelares - AZ Sint Vincentius Deinze, Belgium.