Anticoagulation of Calf Thrombosis (ACT): A Pilot Feasibility Study
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN75175695 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN75175695 |
| Protocol serial number | 781875 |
| Sponsor | Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (UK) |
| Funder | College of Emergency Medicine (UK) |
- Submission date
- 27/11/2010
- Registration date
- 03/12/2010
- Last edited
- 14/07/2014
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Prof Kevin Mackway-Jones
Scientific
Scientific
Emergency Department
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)1612 766781 |
|---|---|
| kevin.c.mackway-jones@manchester.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Prospective open label randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | The Anticoagulation of Calf Thrombosis (ACT) Study: a randomised controlled trial comparing standardised anticoagulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of below knee deep vein thrombosis |
| Study acronym | ACT |
| Study objectives | The treatment of a blood clot in the leg below the level of the knee is a long debated topic. There is ongoing discussion about whether to treat this condition actively with drugs to thin the blood (anticoagulants) or to simply 'watch and wait'. Both approaches are utilised at different hospitals in the North West. Some hospitals 'watch and wait' only. They scan the leg 1 week after presentation, treating only if the clot gets bigger. Several research studies suggest this is as safe an approach as treating the clot. It also avoids exposing patients to the inherent risks of blood thinning drugs. Other hospitals worry about the chance of the clot moving up the leg and rarely into the lungs. They practice treating all patients with anticoagulants to reduce these risks as much as possible. This also means that patients do not have to come back in a weeks time for another scan. Although some risk may be reduced by this approach, there is a potential for anticoagulant drugs to cause harm. This research is trying to find out which approach is safest for patients. To find this out, we propose to randomly allocate patients with below knee blood clots to receive conservative treatment, (stocking supports and simple painkillers), or conservative treatment and anticoagulation. All patients will receive serial leg scans and be followed closely. Short-term assessment and long term follow up will occur. If the trial shows a benefit from treating below knee clots, this will have a major impact on those hospitals which only scan above the knee, as many currently do. If the trial shows no benefit to treating the clots, many patients will be able to avoid the dangers of anticoagulation and further risk. This feasibility trial will look to establish the percentage of recruitable patients from available cohort and feasibility of maintaining treatment allocation for three months. |
| Ethics approval(s) | The North West 7 Research Ethics Committee (REC) - GM Central approved on the 15th of November 2010 subject to a complete response to request for further information (ref: 10/H1008/97) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Calf thrombosis/below knee DVT |
| Intervention | Patients will be randomised to one of the following treatment groups 1. Group A: conservative treatment (TED stockings and simple analgaesia) and full-dose anticoagulation, initiated with Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (dalteparin, dosage based on weight) then converted to oral anticoagulation with warfarin for a duration of 3 months total. Warfarin dosing to be based on International Normalized Ratio (INR) blood clotting measurements aiming for a target range of 2-3. 2. Group B: conservative treatment only All patients will have vascular ultrasound scans at 7 days and 21 days to look for propagation or clot development, along with clinical review. All patients will be clinically followed for the three month duration of treatment. All patients will also be reviewed at two years regarding assessment for post-thrombotic leg syndrome. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Combined incidence of thrombus propagation above knee or development of pulmonary embolism during the 3 months randomisation period |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Incidence of major and minor bleeding episodes |
| Completion date | 01/08/2012 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 100 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. All ambulatory outpatients presenting to Manchester Royal Infirmary Emergency department diagnosed with below knee calf vein thrombosis by vascular ultrasound scan (USS) 2. Able to give informed consent 3. Aged 16-90 |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Hospitalised patients 2. Patients on long-term anticoagulation 3. Associated proximal DVT or confirmed PE 4. Contraindication to anticoagulation (active bleeding, recent haemorrhagic CVA or upper GI bleed) 5. Other indication for immediate warfarinisation as per BSH guidelines: Prior confirmed and treated above knee DVT/PE, antiphospholipid syndrome, symptomatic inherited thrombophilia 6. Pregnancy 7. Chronic non propagating thrombus seen on prior USS 8. Previous enrolment to the ACT study and achievement of the primary outcome |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/01/2011 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/08/2012 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Emergency Department
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/12/2014 | Yes | No | |
| Protocol article | protocol | 02/04/2012 | Yes | No | |
| HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No | ||
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |